Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T)

  • David Sims
  • , Thomas Brettin,
  • , John C. Detter
  • , Cliff Han
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Alex Copeland
  • , Tijana Glavina Del Rio
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Feng Chen
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Hope Tice
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , David Bruce
  • , Lynne Goodwin
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Galina Ovchinnikova
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavrommatis
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Patrik D'haeseleer,
  • , Patrick Chain,
  • , Jim Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz
  • , Susanne Schneider
  • , Markus Göker
  • , Rüdiger Pukall
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • and Hans-Peter Klenk
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.761

Received: 20 July 2009

Published: 20 July 2009


Kytococcus sedentarius (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Stackebrandt et al. 1995 is the type strain of the species, and is of phylogenetic interest because of its location in the Dermacoccaceae, a poorly studied family within the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae. Kytococcus sedentarius is known for the production of oligoketide antibiotics as well as for its role as an opportunistic pathogen causing valve endocarditis, hemorrhagic pneumonia, and pitted keratolysis. It is strictly aerobic and can only grow when several amino acids are provided in the medium. The strain described in this report is a free-living, nonmotile, Gram-positive bacterium, originally isolated from a marine environment. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the family Dermacoccaceae and the 2,785,024 bp long single replicon genome with its 2639 protein-coding and 64 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.


mesophilefree-livingmarineaerobicopportunistic pathogenicDermacoccaceae


Strain 541T (DSM 20547 = ATCC 14392 = JCM 11482 = CCM 314 and other culture collections) is the type strain of the species Kytococcus sedentarius, which is the type species of the genus Kytococcus [1]. Strain 541T was first described as Micrococcus sedentarius (ZoBell and Upham 1944) [2] and later emended as Kytococcus sedentarius in a taxonomic dissection of the genus Micrococcus [1]. The organism is of interest for its biotechnological potential as source of natural antibiotics (oligoketides), for its role as an opportunistic pathogen, and for its position in the tree of life, where it represents the scarcely populated genus Kytococcus (2 species) within in the actinobacterial family Dermacoccaceae [1] (Figure 1). Kytococcus sedentarius 541T was first isolated around 1944 from a marine environment [2], but strains of the species were also frequently isolated from human skin [7]. More recently, closely related strains were also isolated from culture-dependant environmental screenings of a non-saline alkaline groundwater environment in Cabeco de Vide in southern Portugal [8], screening for pelagic bacteria in South Korea [9], tropical marine sediments from the intertidal zone off the coast of the Republic Palau [10], from the ciliate Collinia sp.), an endoparasite of euphausiids from the Gulf of California (unpublished literature, GenBank record EU090136), and in a culture-independent analysis of the microbial burden and diversity in commercial airline cabins [11]. Screening of environmental genomic samples and surveys reported at the NCBI BLAST server indicated no closely related phylotypes that can be linked to the species or genus. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T (Table 1), together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T with all type strains of the family Dermacoccaceae, inferred from 1,456 aligned 16S rRNA characters [3] under the maximum likelihood criterion [4,5]. The tree was rooted with four members of the neighboring family Intrasporangiaceae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Strains with a genome-sequencing project registered in GOLD [6] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold.

Table 1

Classification and general features of Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T based on MIGS recommendations [12]




   Evidence code

   Current classification

  Domain Bacteria

  Phylum Actinobacteria

  Class Actinobacteria

   TAS [13]

  Order Actinomycetales

   TAS [14]

  Suborder Micrococcineae

   TAS [13]

  Family Dermacoccaceae

   TAS [15]

  Genus Kytococcus

   TAS [1]

  Species Kytococcus sedentarius

   TAS [1]

  Type strain 541

   Gram stain


   TAS [1]

   Cell shape

  spherical, predominantly in tetrads

   TAS [1]



   TAS [1]



   TAS [1]

   Temperature range


   TAS [1]

   Optimum temperature


   TAS [1]


  nonhalophilic, but growth in media  up to 10% (w/v) NaCl

   TAS [1]


   Oxygen requirement

  mandatory aerobe

   TAS [1]

   Carbon source

  not reported

   Energy source

  unknown, not starch





   TAS [2]


   Biotic relationship





  in rare cases

   TAS [16,17]

   Biosafety level


   TAS [18]


  slide submerged in sea water

   TAS [2]


   Geographic location

  probably San Diego

   TAS [2]


   Sample collection time

  about or before 1944

   TAS [2]

MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2

   Latitude – Longitude

  not reported



  not reported



  not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed, for a live isolate by one of the authors, or another expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Classification and features

Kytococcus sedentarius cells are spherical/coccoid and occur predominantly in tetrads which can be arranged in cubical packets [1] (Figure 2). Cells are described as Gram-positive, nonmotile, non-encapsulated, and not endospore-forming [1]. Kytococcus sedentarius 541T is strictly aerobic and chemoorganotrophic, requires methionine and other amino acids for growth, and grows well in NaCl at concentrations up to 10% (w/v) [1].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T (Manfred Rohde, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Biology, Braunschweig)

Kytococcus sedentarius (strain NK0508) is capable of degrading diphenylarsenic acid [20], but not starch [1], and does not produce acids from most carbohydrates and alcohols [1]. Its optimal growth temperature is 28-36°C. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite by some Kytococcus sedentarius strains [1]. Kytococcus sedentarius is not only described as the source of the oligoketide antibiotics monensin A and B [21], but has also been associated with pitted keratolysis [16], opportunistic infections, and fatal hemorrhagic pneumonia [17].

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T in a 16S rRNA based tree. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome of strain 541T differed by one nucleotide from each other, and by up to two nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 20547 (X87755).


The murein of Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T contains L-Lys-Glu2, a variation of cell wall type A4α [1]. Mycolic acids and teichonic acids were not reported [1]. Strain 541T contains only completely unsaturated menaquinones with 8-11 isoprene subunits (MK8 to MK11), with MK8 dominating [1]. The major cellular fatty acids are methyl-branched chain iso-C17:1 and anteiso-C17:0, as well as the straight chain saturated C15:0 and C17:0 [1]. Phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol, and phosphatidylinositol were identified as dominating polar lipids [1]. Reported cytochromes include aa3, c626, c550, b557, b561, and b564 [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [6] and is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information





  Finishing quality



  Libraries used

  Two genomic Sanger libraries: 8kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos  libraries.


  Sequencing platforms



  Sequencing coverage

  17.3 x Sanger





  Gene calling method

  Genemark 4.6b, tRNAScan-SE-1.23, infernal 0.81

  Genbank ID


  Genbank Date of Release


  NCBI project ID




  Database: IMG-GEBA



  Source material identifier

  DSM 20547

  Project relevance

  Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T, DSM20547, was grown in DSMZ medium 92 (3% trypticase soy broth, 0.3% yeast extract) at 30°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a modified protocol for cell lysis in first freezing for 20 min. (-70°C), then heating 5 min. (98°C), and cooling 15 min to 37°C; adding 1.5 ml lysozyme (standard: 0.3 ml, only), 1.0 ml achromopeptidase, 0.12 ml lysostaphine, 0.12 ml mutanolysine, 1.5 ml proteinase K (standard: 0.5 ml, only), followed by overnight incubation at 35°C.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of 8 kb and fosmid DNA libraries. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI website. Draft assemblies were based on 60,742 total reads. The Phred/Phrap-/Consed software package was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment [22-24]. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [25] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom priming, or PCR amplification (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). A total of 1,255 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The completed genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius 541T contains 61,582 reads. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all libraries provided > 17x coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using GeneMark [26] as part of the genome annotation pipeline in the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) system [27], followed by a round of manual curation using JGI’s GenePRIMP pipeline. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [28] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using the tool RNAmmer [29]. Other non-coding RNAs were identified by searching the genome for the Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (v0.81) [30]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform [31].

Metabolic network analysis

The metabolic Pathway/Genome Database (PGDB) was computationally generated using Pathway Tools software version 12.5 [32] and MetaCyc version 12.5 [33], based on annotated EC numbers and a customized enzyme name mapping file. It has undergone no subsequent manual curation and may contain errors, similar to a Tier 3 BioCyc PGDB [34].

Genome properties

The genome is 2,785,024 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with a 71.6% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,703 genes predicted, 2,639 were protein-coding genes, 64 encoded RNAs. Eighty-four pseudogenes were also identified. In addition, 72.1% of the genes were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins.

Table 3

Genome Statistics



  % of Total

Genome size (bp)


DNA Coding region (bp)



DNA G+C content (bp)



Number of replicons


Extrachromosomal elements


Total genes



RNA genes



rRNA operons


Protein-coding genes



Pseudo genes



Genes with function prediction



Genes in paralog clusters



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes assigned Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats



Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4, and a cellular overview diagram is presented in Figure 4, followed by a summary of metabolic network statistics shown in Table 5.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 21 general COG functional categories












    RNA processing and modification








    Replication, recombination and repair




    Chromatin structure and dynamics




    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis




    Nuclear structure




    Defense mechanisms




    Signal transduction mechanisms




    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis




    Cell motility








    Extracellular structures




    Intracellular trafficking and secretion




    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




    Energy production and conversion




    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




    Amino acid transport and metabolism




    Nucleotide transport and metabolism




    Coenzyme transport and metabolism




    Lipid transport and metabolism




    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




    General function prediction only




    Function unknown




   Not in COGs

Figure 4

Schematic cellular overview of all pathways of the Kytococcus sedentarius strain 541T metabolism. Nodes represent metabolites, with shape indicating class of metabolite. Lines represent reactions.

Table 5

Metabolic Network Statistics



Total genes




Enzymatic reactions


Metabolic pathways






We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Katja Steenblock (DSMZ) for growing Kytococcus sedentarius 541T cultures. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG)INST 599/1-1.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


  1. Stackebrandt E, Koch C, Gvozdiak O and Schumann P. Taxonomic dissection of the genus Micrococcus: Kocuria gen. nov., Nesterenkonia gen. nov., Kytococcus gen. nov., Dermacoccus gen. nov., and Micrococcus Cohn 1872 gen. emend. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45:682-692 View ArticlePubMed
  2. . Upham HC. A list of marine bacteria including descriptions of sixty new species. Bull Scripps Inst Oceanogr Calif. 1944; 5:239-292
  3. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981; 17:368-376 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. [doi:10.1080/10635150802429642]. [pmid:18853362] Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D475-D479 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Kloss WE, Tornabebe TG and Schleifer KH. Isolation and characterization of Micrococci from human skin, including two species: Micrococcus lylae and Micrococcus kristinae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1974; 24:79-101 View Article
  8. Tiago I, Chung AP and Verissimo A. Bacterial diversity in a nonsaline alkaline environment: heterotrophic aerobic populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70:7378-7387 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Bhattarai HD, Lee YK, Cho KH, Lee HK and Shin HE. The study of antagonistic interactions among pelagic bacteria: a promising way to coin environmental friendly antifouling compounds. Hydrobiologica. 2006; 568:417-423 View Article
  10. Gontang EA, Fenical W and Jensen PR. Phylogenetic diversity of gram-positive bacteria cultured from marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73:3272-3282 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Osman S, La Duc MT, Dekas A, Newcombe D and Venkateswaran K. Microbial burden and diversity of commercial airline cabin air during short and long durations of travel. ISME J. 2008; 2:482-497 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Stackebrandt E, Rainey F and Ward-Rainey N. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:479-491 View Article
  14. Buchanan RE. Studies in the Nomenclature and Classification of the Bacteria: VIII. The Subgroups and Genera of the Actinomycetales. J Bacteriol. 1918; 3:403-406PubMed
  15. Stackebrandt E and Schumann P. Description of Bogoriellaceae fam. nov., Dermacoccaceae fam. nov., Rarobacteraceae fam. nov. and Sanguibacteraceae fam. nov. and emendation of some families of the suborder Micrococcineae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000; 50:1279-1285PubMed
  16. Longshaw CM, Wright JD, Farrell AM and Holland KT. Kytococcus sedentarius, the organism associated with pitted keratolysis, produces two keratin-degrading enzymes. J Appl Microbiol. 2002; 93:810-816 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Levenga H, Donnelly P, Blijlevens N, Verweij P, Shirango H and de Pauw B. Fatal hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by infection due to Kytococcus sedentarius--a pathogen or passenger? Ann Hematol. 2004; 83:447-449 View ArticlePubMed
  18. Anonymous. Biological Agents: Technical rules for biological agents. Web Site
  19. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Nakamiya K, Nakayama T, Ito H, Edmonds JS, Shibata Y and Morita M. Degradation of arylarsenic compounds by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007; 274:184-188 View ArticlePubMed
  21. Pospísil S, Benada O, Kofronova O, Petricek M, Janda L and Havlicek V. Kytococcus sedentarius (formerly Micrococcus sedentarius) and Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis (formerly Micrococcus nishinomiyaensis) produce monensins, typical Streptomyces cinnamonensis metabolites. Can J Microbiol. 1998; 44:1007-1011PubMed
  22. Ewing B and Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998; 8:186-194PubMed
  23. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC and Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998; 8:175-185PubMed
  24. Gordon D, Abajian C and Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998; 8:195-202PubMed
  25. Han CS, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. In: Arabnia AR, Valafar H, Editors. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Bioinformatics & Computational Biology; 2006 June 26-29. CSREA Press. p 141-146.
  26. Besemer J, Lomsadze A and Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29:2607-2618 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Markowitz V, Mavromatis K, Ivanova N, Chen I-M, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Kyrpides N. Expert Review of Functional Annotations for Microbial Genomes. (Submited 2009).
  28. Lowe TM and Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25:955-964 View ArticlePubMed
  29. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T and Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35:3100-3108 View ArticlePubMed
  30. Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR and Bateman A. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33:D121-D124 View ArticlePubMed
  31. Markowitz VM, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Grechkin Y, Chu K, Chen IM, Dubchak I, Anderson I, Lykidis A and Mavromatis K. The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D528-D533 View ArticlePubMed
  32. Karp PD, Paley S, Romero P. The pathway tools software.
  33. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Paley S, Rhee SY, Shearer AG and Tissier C. The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D623-D631 View ArticlePubMed
  34. Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, Goldovsky L, Kaipa P, Ahren D, Tsoka S, Darzentas N, Kunin V and Lopez-Bigas N. Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33:6083-6089 View ArticlePubMed