Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Beutenbergia cavernae type strain (HKI 0122T)

  • Miriam Land,
  • , Rüdiger Pukall
  • , Birte Abt
  • , Markus Göker
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Tijana Glavina Del Rio
  • , Hope Tice
  • , Alex Copeland
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Feng Chen
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , David Bruce,
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Galina Ovchinnikova
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Yun-Juan Chang,
  • , Cynthia C. Jefferies,
  • , Elizabeth Saunders
  • , Thomas Brettin,
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , Patrick Chain,
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • and Alla Lapidus
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1162

Received: 20 July 2009

Published: 20 July 2009

Abstract

Beutenbergia cavernae (Groth et al. 1999) is the type species of the genus and is of phylogenetic interest because of its isolated location in the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae. B. cavernae HKI 0122T is a Gram-positive, non-motile, non-spore-forming bacterium isolated from a cave in Guangxi (China). B. cavernae grows best under aerobic conditions and shows a rod-coccus growth cycle. Its cell wall peptidoglycan contains the diagnostic L-lysine ← L-glutamate interpeptide bridge. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first completed genome sequence from the poorly populated micrococcineal family Beutenbergiaceae, and this 4,669,183 bp long single replicon genome with its 4225 protein-coding and 53 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords:

mesophilenon-pathogenicaerobic and microaerophilicrod-coccus growth cycleMK-8(H4)actinomyceteMicrococcineae

Introduction

Beutenbergia cavernae strain HKI 0122T (DSM 12333 = ATCC BAA-8 = JCM 11478) is the type strain of the species, which represents the type species of the genus Beutenbergia, the type genus of the family Beutenbergiaceae [1]. B. cavernae was described by Groth et al. 1999 as Gram-positive, non-motile and non-spore-forming [1].

The organism is of significant interest for its position in the tree of life within the small (2 type strains) family Beutenbergiaceae Zhi, et al, 2009 emend. Schumann et al. 2009 in the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae [2], which in addition to the genus Beutenbergia contains only the genus Salana [3,4] (Figure 1), also otherwise stated in a recent overview on the class Actinobacteria [2]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. cavernae strain HKI 0122T (Table 1), together with the description of the complete genome sequencing and annotation.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of B. cavernae HKI 0122T and all type strains of the genus Beutenbergia, inferred from 1411 aligned characters [5,6] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [7]. The tree was rooted with species from the genera Isoptericola and Oerskovia, both also members of the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Strains with a genome-sequencing project registered in GOLD [8] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold.

Table 1

Classification and general features of B. cavernae HKI 0122T based on the MIGS recommendations [9]

MIGS ID

     Property

     Term

   Evidence code

     Current classification

     Domain Bacteria

     Phylum Actinobacteria

     Class Actinobacteria

   TAS [10]

     Order Actinomycetales

   TAS [10]

     Suborder Micrococcineae

   TAS [2]

     Family Beutenbergiaceae

   TAS [2]

     Genus Beutenbergia

   TAS [1]

     Species Beutenbergia cavernae

   TAS [1]

     Type strain HKI 0122

     Gram stain

     positive

   TAS [1]

     Cell shape

     varies; rod-coccus growth cycle

   TAS [1]

     Motility

     nonmotile

   TAS [1]

     Sporulation

     non-sporulating

   TAS [1]

     Temperature range

     mesophile

   TAS [1]

     Optimum temperature

     28°C

   TAS [1]

     Salinity

     tolerance of 2-4% (w/v) NaCl

   TAS [1]

MIGS-22

     Oxygen requirement

     aerobic and microaerobic, no growth under anaerobic conditions

   TAS [1]

     Carbon source

     glucose, maltose, mannose, cellobiose

   TAS [1]

     Energy source

     unknown

MIGS-6

     Habitat

     cave (soil)

   TAS [1]

MIGS-15

     Biotic relationship

MIGS-14

     Pathogenicity

     none

   NAS

     Biosafety level

     1

   TAS [11]

     Isolation

     cave, soil between rocks

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4

     Geographic location

     Guangxi, China

   TAS [1]

MIGS-5

     Sample collection time

     about 1999

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2

     Longitude     Latitude

     110.263306     25.307878

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4.3

     Depth

     not reported

MIGS-4.4

     Altitude

     not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [12]. If the evidence code is IDA the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

In addition to strain HKI 0122T, only one additional strain (HKI 0132) was isolated from the soil sample collected in the Reed Flute Cave near Guilin, Guangxi, China. HKI 0132 was also classified in the species B. cavernae [1]. No closely related isolates and uncultivated clones with more than 97% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity are recorded in the microbiological literature, nor can any phylotype from environmental samples or genomic surveys be directly linked to B. cavernae.

B. cavernae cells vary in shape and colonies grown on rich medium vary in color from cream to bright yellow. In young cultures, cells are irregular rods arranged in palisades, clusters or in pairs at an angle to give V-formations (Figure 2) [1]. Cells in stationary cultures are predominantly coccoid, occurring singly, in pairs, irregular clusters and short chains. During growth in complex media a rod-coccus growth cycle was observed [1]. B. cavernae grow well under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions, but not under anaerobic conditions [1]. The optimal growth temperature is 28°C [1].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of B. cavernae HKI 0122T

B. cavernae is able to degrade casein, esculin, gelatin and potato starch. Acids are produced from L-arabinose, D-cellobiose, dextrin, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-glucose, glycerol, inulin, maltose, D-mannose, D-raffinose, L-rhamnose, D-ribose, salicin, sucrose, starch, trehalose and D-xylose. There is no acid production from D-glucitol, lactose and D-mannitol. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite, H2S is produced [1].

Classification and features

Figure 1. shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of B. cavernae strain HKI 0122T in a 16S rRNA based tree. Analysis of the two identical 16S rRNA gene sequences in the genome of strain HKI differed by four nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 12333 (Y18378). The slight differences between the genome data and the reported 16S rRNA gene sequence is most likely due to sequencing errors in the previously reported sequence data .

Chemotaxonomy

The peptidoglycan of B. cavernae HKI 0122T contains D- and L-alanine, D- and L-glutamic acid and L-lysine, with the latter widely distributed among actinobacteria [1]. The strain possesses a type A4⟨ peptidoglycan with a diagnostic LLys←L-Glu interpeptide bridge, type A11.54 according to Web Site. Glucose, mannose and galactose are the cell wall sugars [1]. The fatty acid profile of strain B. cavernae HKI 0122T is dominated by 13-methyl tetradecanoic (iso-C15:0; 43.7%) and 12-methyl tetradecanoic (anteiso-C15:0; 34.6%) saturated, branched chain acids. Other predominantly saturated fatty acids play a minor role in the cellular fatty acid composition of the strain: iso-C14:0 (0.9%), C14:0 (1.9%); C15:0 (0.9%) isoC16:0 (2.3%), C16:0 (6.8%), isoC17:0 (3.1%), anteiso-C17:0 (4.9%), und C18:1 (0.9%) [1]. Mycolic acids are not present [1]. MK-8(H4) is the major menaquinone, complemented by minor amounts of MK-8(H2), MK-8 and MK-9(H4) [1]. The combination of the LLys←L-Glu interpeptide bridge and MK-8(H4) as the dominating menaquinone is shared with the organisms from the neighboring genera Bogoriella and Georgenia. The polar lipids of strain HKI 0122T consist of phosphatidylinositol and diphosphatidylglycerol together with three yet unidentified phospholipids [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [8] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank (CP001618). Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Finished

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Three genomic libraries: two Sanger libraries - 8 kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos - andone 454 pyrosequence standard library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

ABI3730, 454 GS FLX

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

8.56x Sanger; 10.86x pyrosequence

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal

INSDC / Genbank ID

CP001618

Genbank Date of Release

May 7, 2009

GOLD ID

Gc01025

NCBI project ID

20827

Database: IMG-GEBA

2501416922

MIGS-13

Source material identifier

DSM 12333

Project relevance

Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

B. cavernae HKI 0122T, DSM 12333, was grown in DSMZ medium 736 (Rich Medium) [13] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a modification of the standard protocol for cell lysis in first freezing for 20 min. (-70°C), then heating 5 min. (98°C), and cooling 15 min to 37°C; adding 1.5 ml lysozyme (standard: 0.3 ml, only), 1.0 ml achromopeptidase, 0.12 ml lysostaphine, 0.12 ml mutanolysine, 1.5 ml proteinase K (standard: 0.5 ml, only). Over night incubation at 35°C.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 5,256 overlapping fragments of 1000 bp and entered into the assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [14]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walking or PCR amplification. A total of 1627 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 19.42x coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [15] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGIGenePRIMP pipeline [16]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform [17].

Genome properties

The genome is 4,669,183 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with a 73.1% GC content. (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 4278 genes predicted, 4225 were protein coding genes, and 53 RNAs. Twenty eight pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the genes (74.3%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics

          Attribute

          Value

          % of Total

          Genome size (bp)

          4,669,183

          100.00%

          DNA Coding region (bp)

          4,347,731

          93.12%

          DNA G+C content (bp)

          3,413,947

          73.12%

          Number of replicons

          1

          Extrachromosomal elements

          0

          Total genes

          4278

          100.00%

          RNA genes

          53

          1.24%

          rRNA operons

          2

          Protein-coding genes

          4225

          98.76%

          Pseudo genes

          28

          0.65%

          Genes with function prediction

          3183

          74.40%

          Genes in paralog clusters

          689

          16.11%

          Genes assigned to COGs

          3109

          72.67%

          Genes assigned Pfam domains

          3246

          75.88%

          Genes with signal peptides

          1034

          24.17%

          Genes with transmembrane helices

          1135

          26.53%

          CRISPR repeats

          1

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 21 general COG functional categories

Code

  Value

   %age

    Description

J

  169

   4

    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

  4

   0.1

    RNA processing and modification

K

  384

   9.1

    Transcription

L

  122

   2.9

    Replication, recombination and repair

B

  1

   0

    Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

  25

   0.6

    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

  0

   0

    Nuclear structure

V

  95

   2.3

    Defense mechanisms

T

  138

   3.3

    Signal transduction mechanisms

M

  166

   3.9

    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

  1

   0

    Cell motility

W

  0

   0

    Cytoskeleton

U

  27

   0.6

    Extracellular structures

O

  89

   2.1

    Intracellular trafficking and secretion

G

  546

   12.9

    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

E

  264

   6.3

    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

F

  92

   2.2

    Amino acid transport and metabolism

H

  129

   3.1

    Nucleotide transport and metabolism

I

  101

   2.4

    Coenzyme transport and metabolism

P

  183

   4.3

    Lipid transport and metabolism

Q

  62

   1.5

    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

R

  433

   10.3

    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

S

  249

   5.9

    General function prediction only

-

  1116

   26.4

    Function unknown

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Katja Steenblock for growing B. cavernae cultures and Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction and quality analysis (both at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy's Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-1.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Groth I, Schumann P, Schütze B, Augsten K, Kramer I and Stackebrandt E. Beutenbergia cavernae, gen. nov., sp. nov., a L-lysine-containing actinomycete isolated from a cave. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49:1733-1740 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Zhi XY, Li WJ and Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and embedded descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:589-608 View ArticlePubMed
  3. von Wintzingerode F, Göbel UB, Siddiqui RA, Rösick U, Schumann P, Frühling A, Rohde M, Pukall R and Stackebrandt E. Salana multivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from an anaerobic bioreactor and capable of selenate reduction. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001; 51:1653-1661PubMed
  4. Schumann P, Kampfer P, Busse HJ and Evtushenko LI. Proposed minimal standards for describing new genera and species of the suborder Micrococcineae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:1823-1849 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  7. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D475-D479 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes: the “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA and Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:479-491 View Article
  11. Biological Agents. Technical rules for biological agents TRBA 466.Web Site
  12. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Yamada K and Komagata K. Taxonomic studies on coryneform bacteria IV. Morphological, cultural, biochemical, and physiological characteristics. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1972; 18:399-416 View Article
  14. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F and Lucas S. Complete genome of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (strain 541T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:12-20 View Article
  15. Web Site
  16. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA and Kyrpides NC. Expert Review of Functional Annotations for Microbial Genomes. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. in preparation. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed