Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Thermocrinis albus type strain (HI 11/12T)

  • Reinhard Wirth
  • , Johannes Sikorski
  • , Evelyne Brambilla
  • , Monica Misra,
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Alex Copeland
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Feng Chen
  • , Hope Tice
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , Roxane Tapia,
  • , David Bruce,
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Iain Anderson
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Natalia Mikhailova
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Yvonne Bilek
  • , Thomas Hader
  • , Miriam Land,
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Yun-Juan Chang,
  • , Cynthia D. Jeffries,
  • , Brian J. Tindall
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Markus Göker
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • and Hans-Peter Klenk
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.761490

Received: 30 March 2010

Published: 30 April 2010

Abstract

Thermocrinis albus Eder and Huber 2002 is one of three species in the genus Thermocrinis in the family Aquificaceae. Members of this family have become of significant interest because of their involvement in global biogeochemical cycles in high-temperature ecosystems. This interest had already spurred several genome sequencing projects for members of the family. We here report the first completed genome sequence a member of the genus Thermocrinis and the first type strain genome from a member of the family Aquificaceae. The 1,500,577 bp long genome with its 1,603 protein-coding and 47 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords:

microaerophilic(hyper-)thermophilechemolithoautotrophicbiogeochemistrynon-sporeformingGram-negativeflagellatednon-pathogenAquificaceaeGEBA

Introduction

Strain HI 11/12T (= DSM 14484 = JCM 11386) is the type strain of the species Thermocrinis albus [1]. Officially, the genus Thermocrinis currently contains three species [2], however, it should be noted that at the time of writing, the 16S rDNA sequence of the type strain of Thermocrinis ruber held in the DSMZ open collection as DSM 12173 does not correspond with that published under AJ005640. The generic name derives from the Greek word ‘therme’, meaning ‘heat’, and the Latin word ‘crinis’, hair, meaning ‘hot hair’, referring to the long hair-like filamentous cell structures found in the high-temperature environments, such as hot-spring outlets [3]. These long filaments are formed under conditions where there is a continuous flow of medium. The species name is derived from the Greek word ‘alphos’, white, referring to the cell color [1]. Strain HI 11/12T has been isolated from whitish streamers in Hveragerthi, Iceland [3]. Other strains of the species have been isolated from further high-temperature habitats in Iceland, but also in Kamchatka, Russia [1]. Members of the genus Thermocrinis appear to play a major ecological role in global biochemical cycles in such high-temperature habitats [4-7]. As currently defined the genus does not appear to form a monophyletic group, suggesting that further taxonomic work is necessary.

The large interest in the involvement of members of the family Aquificaceae in global biogeochemical cycles in high-temperature ecosystems made them attractive targets for early genome sequencing, e.g.Aquifex aeolicus’ [8], the third hyperthermophile whose genome was already decoded in 1998 [9]. Like ‘A. aeolicus’ (a name that was never validly published) strain VF5 [10], Hydrogenobaculum sp. Y04AAS1 (CP001130, JGI unpublished) and Hydrogenivirga sp. 128-5-R1-1 (draft, Moore Foundation) do not represent type strains. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. albus HI 11/12T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Only four cultivated strains are reported for the species T. albus in addition to HI 11/12T: Strains H7L1B and G3L1B from the same team that isolated HI 11/12T [1], and SRI-48 (AF255599) from hot spring microbial mats [11]. All three strains originate from Iceland and share 98.9-99.7% 16S rRNA sequence identity with HI 11/12T. The only non-Icelandic isolate, UZ23L3A (99.2%), originates from Kamchatka (Russia) [1]. Almost all uncultured clones also originate from Iceland: clones KF6 and HV-7 (GU233821 and GU233840, >99%) from water-saturated sediment in the Krafla and Hveragerdi geothermal systems, respectively. Clones GY1-1 and GY1-2 (GU233809, GU233812, >99%) from water-saturated sediment Geysir hot springs; clone SUBT-1 (AF361217, 99.2%) from subterranean hot springs [12], and clone PIce1 (AF301907, 99.3%) as the dominant clone from a blue filament community of a thermal spring. Only clone PNG_TB_4A2.5H2_B11 (EF100635, 95.9%) originated from a non-Icelandic source: a heated, arsenic-rich sediment of a shallow submarine hydrothermal system on Ambitle Island, Papua New Guinea. According to the original publication the 16S rRNA of the type strain of the closest related species within the genus, T. ruber [3], shares 95.2% sequence identity, whereas the type strains from the closest related genus, Hydrogenobacter, share 94.7-95.0% sequence identity, as determined with EzTaxon [13]. However, as noted above the 16S rDNA sequence of the T. ruber strain held in the DSMZ (DSM 12173) does not correspond with the sequence deposited (AJ005640). Environmental samples and metagenomic surveys featured in the NCBI database contain not a single sequence with >88% sequence identity (as of February 2010), indicating that the species T. albus might play a rather limited and regional role in the environment.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of T. albus HI 11/12T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequence of the single 16S rRNA gene copy in the genome differs by seven nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 14484 (AJ278895), which contains two ambiguous base calls.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. albus HI 11/12T relative to the other type strains within the family Aquificaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,439 aligned characters [14,15] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [16] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 250 bootstrap replicates [17] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [18] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. Note that the sequence AJ005640 does not correspond with that from the type strain of T. ruber deposited as DSM 12173.

When grown in the laboratory in a continuous flow of medium, for example in a glass chamber [1], strain HI 11/12T exhibits filamentous growth with a length of 10-60 µm [1]. When grown in static culture, the strain grows singly or in pairs [1]. The cells are short rods with 0.5-0.6 µm in width by 1-3 µm in length and motile by means of a monopolar monotrichous flagellum [1] (Figure 2 and Table 1). However, no flagella are visible in Figure 2. A regularly arrayed surface layer protein was not observed [1].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of T. albus HI 11/12T

Table 1

Classification and general features of T. albus HI 11/12T according to the MIGS recommendations [19]

MIGS ID

     Property

     Term

     Evidence code

     Current classification

     Domain Bacteria

     TAS [20]

     Phylum Aquificae

     TAS [21]

     Class Aquificae

     TAS [21]

     Order Aquificales

     TAS [22]

     Family Aquificaceae

     TAS [23]

     Genus Thermocrinis

     TAS [3]

     Species Thermocrinis albus

     TAS [1]

     Type strain HI 11/12

     TAS [1]

     Gram stain

     Gram negative

     TAS [1]

     Cell shape

     both filament and rod

     TAS [1]

     Motility

     monopolar monotrichous flagellation

     TAS [1]

     Sporulation

     non-sporulating

     TAS [1]

     Temperature range

     55–89°C

     TAS [1]

     Optimum temperature

     not determined

     TAS [1]

     Salinity

     ≤ 0.7%

     TAS [1]

MIGS-22

     Oxygen requirement

     aerobic

     TAS [1]

     Carbon source

     CO2, no organic carbon source reported

     TAS [1,24]

     Energy source

     chemolithoautotrophic

     TAS [1]

MIGS-6

     Habitat

     hot spring

     TAS [1]

MIGS-15

     Biotic relationship

     free living

     TAS [1]

MIGS-14

     Pathogenicity

     not reported

     TAS [3,25]

     Biosafety level

     1

     TAS [25]

     Isolation

     hot streamlet

     TAS [1]

MIGS-4

     Geographic location

     Hverageroi, Iceland

     TAS [1]

MIGS-5

     Sample collection time

     1998 or before

     TAS [3]

MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2

     Latitude      Longitude

     64,      -21.2

     NAS

MIGS-4.3

     Depth

     unknown

MIGS-4.4

     Altitude

     30 m

     NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Strain 11/12T is microaerophilic with oxygen as electron acceptor [1]. Strain 11/12T appears to be strictly chemolithoautotrophic [1]. This differentiates T. albus from its two sister species T. ruber and T. minervae, which both can also grow chemoorganoheterotrophically [3,24]. Strain 11/12T grows optimally under microaerophilic conditions when hydrogen and sulfur are present simultaneously as electron donors [1], however, no growth is observed on nitrate. Physiological characteristics such as the wide temperature preference are reported in Table 1.

Chemotaxonomy

The cell wall of strain 11/12T contains meso-diaminopimelic acid [1]. There are no reports on the presence of a lipopolysaccharide in the typical Gram-negative cell wall, although there are reports of an LPS in Aquifex pyrophilus [27,28]. Cellular polyamines are important to stabilize cellular nucleic acid structure as a major function, and may function in thermophilic eubacteria as important chemotaxonomic markers [29]. In the genus Thermocrinis, the major polyamines are spermidine and a quaternary branched penta-amine, N4-bis(aminopropyl)-norspermidine [29].

The major fatty acids in strain HI 11/12T are cyclo-C21:0 (42%, 2 isomers), C18:0 (14%), C20:1 cΔ11 (10.7%), C20:1 cΔ13 (8.2%), C20:1 tΔ11 (5.4%), and C20:1 tΔ13 (3.5%) [30]. All other fatty acids are below 2.9%) [30]. The polar lipids are based on ester linked fatty acids (diacyl glycerols) and monoether (probably in the form of monoester-monoether glycerols), in which the ether linked side chain includes C18:0 (78.5%), C20:0 (2.0%), C20:1 (17.6%) and C21:0 (1.9%) side chains [30].

T. albus belongs to a group of organisms where characteristic sulfur containing napthoquinones, menathioquinones (2-methylthio-1,4-naphthoquinone) are present [31-35]. The polar lipids reported in members of the genera Aquifex, Hydrogenobaculum, Hydrogenothermus and Thermocrinis are also characteristic, with an unusual aminopentanetetrol phospholipid derivative being present in all strains examined [36,37]. Where detailed analyses have been carried out phosphatidylinositol has also been reported [37]. Stöhr et al. labeled these lipids PNL and PL1 respectively [31].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [38]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [18] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

     Property

      Term

MIGS-31

     Finishing quality

      Finished

MIGS-28

     Libraries used

      Two 454 pyrosequence libraries, standard      and pairs end (17 kb insert size)

MIGS-29

     Sequencing platforms

      454 Titanium, Illumina GAii

MIGS-31.2

     Sequencing coverage

      52.9× 454 Titanim; 298× Illumina

MIGS-30

     Assemblers

      Newbler, Velvet, phrap

MIGS-32

     Gene calling method

      Prodigal, GenePRIMP

     INSDC ID

      CP001931

     Genbank Date of Release

      February 19, 2010

     GOLD ID

      Gc01206

     NCBI project ID

      37275

     Database: IMG-GEBA

      2502082116

MIGS-13

     Source material identifier

      DSM 14484

     Project relevance

      Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. albus HI 11/12T, DSM 14484, was grown in DSMZ medium 887 (OS Medium) [39] at 80°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive Kit (Epicentre MGP04100) with a modified protocol for cell lysis, using an additional 5 µl mutanolysin to standard lysis solution, and one hour incubation on ice after the MPC-step.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain HI 11/12T was sequenced using a combination of Illumina [40] and 454. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 447 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 287 bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 17 Kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at Web Site. Illumina sequencing data were assembled with VELVET [41], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. Draft assemblies were based on 79 Mb 454 draft data. Newbler parameters were -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial assembly contained six contigs in one scaffold. We converted the initial 454 assembly into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (Web Site) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap. Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (unpublished; Web Site), Dupfinisher or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing [42]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J-F. Chan, unpublished). A total of 68 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The completed genome sequence had an error rate of less than 1 in 100,000 bp

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [43] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome an-notation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [44]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [45].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 1,500,577 bp long chromosome with a 46.9% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 1,650 genes predicted, 1,593 were protein coding genes, and 47 RNAs; 10 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (75.2%) were assigned with a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute

   Value

% of Total

Genome size (bp)

   1,500,577

100.00%

DNA coding region (bp)

   1,459,457

97.26%

DNA G+C content (bp)

   704,229

46.93%

Number of replicons

   1

Extrachromosomal elements

   0

Total genes

   1,650

100.00%

RNA genes

   47

2.85%

rRNA operons

   1

Protein-coding genes

   1,603

97.15%

Pseudo genes

   10

0.61%

Genes with function prediction

   1,241

75.21%

Genes in paralog clusters

   124

7.52%

Genes assigned to COGs

   1,316

79.76%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

   1,333

80.79%

Genes with signal peptides

   243

14.73%

Genes with transmembrane helices

   322

19.52%

CRISPR repeats

   4

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code

   value

   %age

      Description

J

   131

   8.2

      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

   0

   0.0

      RNA processing and modification

K

   45

   2.8

      Transcription

L

   80

   5.0

      Replication, recombination and repair

B

   2

   0.1

      Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

   0

   0.0

      Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

   0

   0.0

      Nuclear structure

V

   11

   0.7

      Defense mechanisms

T

   47

   2.9

      Signal transduction mechanisms

M

   111

   6.9

      Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

   57

   3.6

      Cell motility

Z

   0

   0.0

      Cytoskeleton

W

   0

   0.0

      Extracellular structures

U

   58

   3.6

      Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

   78

   4.9

      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

   140

   8.7

      Energy production and conversion

G

   48

   3.0

      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

   118

   7.4

      Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

   49

   3.1

      Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

   96

   6.0

      Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

   39

   2.4

      Lipid transport and metabolism

P

   74

   4.6

      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

   16

   1.0

      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

   148

   9.2

      General function prediction only

S

   79

   4.9

      Function unknown

-

   334

   20.8

      Not in COGs

Insights from the genome sequence

With only very few papers published on the organism [1,2], and only one gene sequence (16S rRNA) available in GenBank from strain HI 11/12T, a comparison of already known sequences to the here presented novel genomic data is rather meager for T. albus. As shown in Figure 1, there are presently no other type strain genomes from the Aquificaceae available either to allow a meaningful comparative genomics analysis. This might change when other type/neotype strains of species within the genus Thermocrinis which are also part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [38] will become available in the near future.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy's Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-1 and SI 1352/1-2.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Eder W and Huber R. New isolates and physiological properties of the Aquificales and description of Thermocrinis albus sp. nov. Extremophiles. 2002; 6:309-318 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Huber R, Eder W, Heldwein S, Wanner G, Huber H, Rachel R and Stetter KO. Thermocrinis ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., a pink-filament-forming hyperthermophilic bacterium isolated from Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64:3576-3583PubMed
  3. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:590-592 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Hall JR, Mitchell KR, Jackson-Weaver O, Kooser AS, Cron BR, Crossey LJ and Takacs-Vesbach CD. Molecular characterization of the diversity and distribution of a thermal spring microbial community by using rRNA and metabolic genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008; 74:4910-4922 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Connon SA, Koski AK, Neal AL, Wood SA and Magnuson TS. Ecophysiology and geochemistry of microbial arsenic oxidation within a high arsenic, circumneutral hot spring system of the Alvord Desert. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008; 64:117-128 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Hamamura N, Macur RE, Korf S, Ackerman G, Taylor WP, Kozubal M, Reysenbach AL and Inskeep WP. Linking microbial oxidation of arsenic with detection and phylogenetic analysis of arsenite oxidase genes in diverse geothermal environments. Environ Microbiol. 2009; 11:421-431 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Hügler M, Huber H, Molyneaux SJ, Vetriani C and Sievert SM. Autotrophic CO2 fixation via the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle in different lineages within the phylum Aquificae: evidence for two ways of citrate cleavage. Environ Microbiol. 2007; 9:81-92 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Deckert G, Warren PV, Gaasterland T, Young WG, Lennox AL, Graham DE, Overbeek R, Snead MA, Keller M and Aujay M. The complete genome of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. Nature. 1998; 392:353-358 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Klenk HP. The genomics of a hot-water maker. Nat Genet. 1998; 19:4-6 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Huber R, Stetter KO. Genus I. Aquifex Huber and Stetter 1992e, 656VP (Effective publication: Huber and Stetter in Huber, Wilharm, Huber, Trincone, Burggraf, König, Rachel, Rockinger, Fricke and Stetter 1992b, 349). In: Boone DR, Castenholz WR, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 1 (The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria), Springer, New York, 2001, pp. 360-362.
  11. Skirnisdottir S, Hreggvidsson GO, Hjorleifsdottir S, Marteinsson VT, Petursdottir SK, Holst O and Kristjansson JK. Influence of sulfide and temperature on species composition and community structure of hot spring microbial mats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66:2835-2841 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Marteinsson VT, Hauksdottir S, Hobel CF, Kristmannsdottir H, Hreggvidsson GO and Kristjansson JK. Phylogenetic diversity analysis of subterranean hot springs in Iceland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67:4242-4248 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK and Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:2259-2261 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  15. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  16. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009; 5541:184-200 View Article
  18. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:D346-D354 View ArticlePubMed
  19. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the do-mains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  21. Reysenbach AL. Class I, Aquificae phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 1, Springer, NY, 2001, p. 359.
  22. Reysenbach AL. Order I, Aquificae class nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 1, Springer, NY, 2001, p. 359.
  23. Reysenbach AL. Family I, Aquificaceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 1, Springer, NY, 2001, p. 360.
  24. Caldwell SL, Liu Y, Ferrera I, Beveridge T and Reysenbach A-L. Thermocrinis minervae sp. nov., a hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing, thermophilic member of the Aquificales from a Costa Rican terrestrial hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. (In press).PubMed
  25. Classification of Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups Technical rules for biological agents TRBA 466.Web Site
  26. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Plötz BM, Lindner B, Stetter KO and Holst OJ. Characterization of a novel lipid A containing D-galacturonic acid that replaces phosphate residues. The structure of the lipid A of the lipopolysaccharide from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex pyrophilus. Biol Chem. 2000; 275:11222-11228 View Article
  28. Mamat U, Schmidt HE, Lindner B, Fukase K, Hanuszkiewicz A, Wu J, Meredith TC, Woodard RW, Hilgenfeld R and Mesters JR. WaaA of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus is a monofunctional 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid transferase involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284:22248-22262 View ArticlePubMed
  29. Hosoya R, Hamana K, Niitsu M and Itoh T. Polyamine analysis for chemotaxonomy of thermophilic eubacteria: Polyamine distribution profiles within the orders Aquificales, Thermotogales, Thermodesulfobacteriales, Thermales, Thermoanaerobacteriales, Clostridiales and Bacillales. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2004; 50:271-287 View ArticlePubMed
  30. Jahnke LL, Eder W, Huber R, Hope JM, Hinrichs KU, Hayes JM, Des Marais DJ, Cady SL and Summons RE. Signature lipids and stable carbon isotope analyses of Octopus Spring hyperthermophilic communities compared with those of aquificales representatives. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67:5179-5189 View ArticlePubMed
  31. Stöhr R, Waberski A, Völker H, Tindall BJ and Thomm M. Hydrogenothermus marinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium, recognition of Calderobacterium hydrogenophilum as a member of the genus Hydrogenobacter and proposal of the reclassification of Hydrogenobacter acidophilus as Hydrogenobaculum acidophilum gen. nov., comb. nov., in the phylum ‘Hydrogenobacter/Aquifex’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001; 51:1853-1862PubMed
  32. Ishii M, Kawasumi T, Igarashi Y, Kodama T and Minoda Y. 2-Methylthio-1,4-naphthoquinone, a new quinone from an extremely thermophilic hydrogen bacterium. Agric Biol Chem. 1983; 47:167-169
  33. Ishii M, Kawasumi T, Igarashi Y, Kodama T and Minoda Y. 2-Methylthio-1,4-naphthoquinone, a unique sulfur containing quinone from a thermophilic hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium, Hydrogenobacter thermophilus. J Bacteriol. 1987; 169:2380-2384PubMed
  34. Nishihara H, Igarashi Y and Kodama T. A new isolate of Hydrogenobacter, an obligately chemolithoautotrophic, thermophilic, halophilic and aerobic hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium from seaside saline hot spring. Arch Microbiol. 1990; 153:294-298 View Article
  35. Shima S and Suzuki KI. Hydrogenobacter acidophilus sp. nov., a thermoacidophilic, aerobic, hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium requiring elemental sulfur for growth. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993; 43:703-708 View Article
  36. Sturt HF, Summons RE, Smith K and Elvert M. Hinrichs K-U. Intact polar membrane lipids in prokaryotes and sediments deciphered by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometry — new biomarkers for biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004; 18:617-628 View ArticlePubMed
  37. Yoshino J, Sugiyama Y, Sakuda S, Kodama T, Nagasawa H, Ishii M and Igarashi Y. Chemical structure of a novel aminophospholipid from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus strain TK-6. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183:6302-6304 View ArticlePubMed
  38. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060 View ArticlePubMed
  39. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  40. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5:433-438 View ArticlePubMed
  41. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  42. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter J, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F and Lucas S. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:12-20 View Article
  43. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  44. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods. (In press).
  45. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed