Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Aminobacterium colombiense type strain (ALA-1T)

  • Olga Chertkov,
  • , Johannes Sikorski
  • , Evelyne Brambilla
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Alex Copeland
  • , Tijana Glavina Del Rio
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Hope Tice
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , David Bruce,
  • , Roxanne Tapia,
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Konstantinos Liolios
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Galina Ovchinnikova
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Miriam Land,
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Yun-Juan Chang,
  • , Cynthia D. Jeffries,
  • , Stefan Spring
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Markus Göker
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • and Hans-Peter Klenk
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.902116

Received: 15 June 2010

Published: 30 June 2010

Abstract

Aminobacterium colombiense Baena et al. 1999 is the type species of the genus Aminobacterium. This genus is of large interest because of its isolated phylogenetic location in the family Synergistaceae, its strictly anaerobic lifestyle, and its ability to grow by fermentation of a limited range of amino acids but not carbohydrates. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the second completed genome sequence of a member of the family Synergistaceae and the first genome sequence of a member of the genus Aminobacterium. The 1,980,592 bp long genome with its 1,914 protein-coding and 56 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords:

strictly anaerobicfermentation of amino acidsgram-negative firmicutesyntrophic organismSynergistaceaeGEBA

Introduction

Strain ALA-1T (= DSM 12261) is the type strain of the species Aminobacterium colombiense, which is the type species of the genus Aminobacterium [1,2]. The name of the genus relates to its ability to ferment amino acids and the species name refers to origin of the isolate, Columbia [1]. Currently, the genus Aminobacterium consists of only two species [1,3,4]. Strain ALA-1T has been isolated from an anaerobic dairy wastewater lagoon in 1998 or before [1]. At the moment, strain ALA-1T is the only known isolate of this species. Highly similar (98%) nearly complete (>1,400 bp) uncultured 16S gene clone sequences were frequently obtained from anaerobic habitats, e.g., from anaerobic municipal solid waste samples in France [5], from a biogas fermentation enrichment culture in China (GU476615), from a swine wastewater anaerobic digestion in a UASB reactor in China (FJ535518), and from a mesophilic anaerobic BSA digester in Japan [6], suggesting quite a substantial contribution of Aminobacterium to anaerobic prokaryotic communities. The type strain of the only other species in the genus, A. mobile [3] shares 95% 16S rRNA sequence identity with A. colombiense, whereas the type strains of the other species in the family Synergistaceae share between 84.3 and 88.3% 16S rRNA sequence identity [7]. Environmental samples and metagenomic surveys detected only one significantly similar phylotype (BABF01000111, 92% sequence similarity) in a human gut microbiome [7], with all other phylotypes sharing less than 84% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity, indicating a rather limited general ecological importance of the members of the genus Aminobacterium (status April 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for A. colombiense ALA-1T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of A. colombiense ALA-1T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three identical copies of the 16S rRNA gene in the genome differ by 14 nucleotides (0.9%) from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 12661 (AF069287). which contains 3 ambiguous base calls. These differences are most likely due to sequencing errors in AF069287.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. colombiense ALA-1T relative to the other type strains within the phylum Synergistetes. The tree was inferred from 1,282 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [11]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 250 bootstrap replicates [12] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [13] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome of Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans [14].

The cells are rod-like, occasionally slightly curved with 3-4 µm in length and 0.2-0.3 µm in width (Figure 2 and Table 1) [1]. The colonies are up to 1.0 mm in diameter and are round, smooth, lens-shaped, and white [1]. Strain ALA-1T requires yeast extract for growth and ferments serine, glycine, threonine, and pyruvate in its presence [1]. Poor growth is obtained on casamino acids, peptone, biotrypcase, cysteine and α-ketoglutarate [1]. The fermentation and end-products include acetate and H2, and also propionate in the case of α-ketoglutarate fermentation. Carbohydrates (such as glucose, saccharose, ribose, xylose, cellobiose, mellobiose, maltose, galactose, mannose, arabinose, rhamnose, lactose, sorbose and mannitol), gelatin, casein, glycerol, ethanol, acetate, propionate, butyrate, lactate, citrate, fumarate, malate, succinate and the other amino acids tested are not utilized [1].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of A. colombiense ALA-1T

Table 1

Classification and general features of A. colombiense ALA-1T according to the MIGS recommendations [15]

MIGS ID

     Property

     Term

    Evidence code

     Current classification

     Domain Bacteria

    TAS [16]

     Phylum Synergistetes

    TAS [17]

     Class Synergistia

    TAS [17]

     Order Synergistales

    TAS [17]

     Family Synergistaceae

    TAS [17]

     Genus Aminobacterium

    TAS [1,18]

     Species Aminobacterium colombiense

    TAS [1,18]

     Type strain ALA-1

    TAS [1]

     Gram stain

     negative

    TAS [1]

     Cell shape

     slightly curved to rod shaped

    TAS [1]

     Motility

     nonmotile

    TAS [1]

     Sporulation

     non-sporulating

    TAS [1]

     Temperature range

     mesophile, 20°C – 42°C, no growth at     18°C and 45°C

    TAS [1]

     Optimum temperature

     37 °C

    TAS [1]

     Salinity

     no NaCl required,     tolerates less than 1.5% NaCl

    TAS [1]

MIGS-22

     Oxygen requirement

     strictly anaerobic

    TAS [1]

     Carbon source

     serine, threonine, glycine and pyruvate,     not carbohydrates

    TAS [1]

     Energy source

     serine, threonine, glycine and pyruvate,     not carbohydrates

    TAS [1]

MIGS-6

     Habitat

     anaerobic sludge

    TAS [1]

MIGS-15

     Biotic relationship

     free-living

    TAS [1]

MIGS-14

     Pathogenicity

     pathogenicity is not reported

    NAS

     Biosafety level

     1

    TAS [19]

     Isolation

     anaerobic dairy wastewater lagoon

    TAS [1]

MIGS-4

     Geographic location

     Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia

    TAS [1]

MIGS-5

     Sample collection time

     1998 or before

    TAS [1]

MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2

     Latitude     Longitude

     4.63     -74.08

    NAS

MIGS-4.3

     Depth

     unknown

MIGS-4.4

     Altitude

     about 2,640 m

    NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [20]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

As typical for anoxic habitats, strain ALA-1T is engaged in syntrophic interactions: alanine, glutamate, valine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, aspartate and malate are oxidized only in the presence of the hydrogenotroph, Methanobacterium formicicum, strain DSM 1525 [1]. In addition, the utilization of cysteine, threonine and α-ketoglutarate are also improved in the presence of M. formicicum [1]. An 80% hydrogen atmosphere (supplied as H2-CO, (80:20) at 2 bar pressure) inhibits growth of strain ALA-1T on threonine and α-ketoglutarate, whereas glycine degradation is not affected [1]. Serine and pyruvate degradation are partially affected by the presence of hydrogen. Sulfate, thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, sulfite, nitrate, and fumarate are not utilized as electron acceptors [1]. Strain ALA-1T does not perform the Stickland reaction when alanine is provided as an electron donor and glycine, serine, arginine or proline are provided as electron acceptor.

As noted above, alanine is oxidized only in the presence of the hydrogenotroph M. formicicum, which utilizes the produced H2 [1]. In the absence of an H2-consuming organism, the H2 partial pressure would rapidly reach a level that thermodynamically inhibits further fermentation [21]. Adams and colleagues used a H2-purging culture vessel to replace the H2-consuming syntrophic partner, in order to study in detail the energetic characteristics of alanine consumption of strain ALA-1T in a pure culture [21].

Strain ALA-1T is non-motile [1], whereas interestingly the other species in the genus, A. mobile, is motile by means of lateral flagella [3]. A parallel situation is in the genus Anaerobaculum (Figure 1), where A. thermoterrenum is non-motile [22] but A. mobile is motile by means of lateral flagella [23]. In fact, the phenotype of non-motility versus motility by means of lateral flagella is heterogeneously distributed among the organisms depicted in Figure 1. This may suggest that the last common ancestor of the group shown in Figure 1 was motile by flagella and that the selection pressure for a functioning flagella might be currently more relaxed in this group, leading in individual strains to mutational inactivation of the flagella. Interestingly, the annotation of the genome does not give any indication of the presence of any genes related to flagellar assembly. The only genes related to cellular motility refer to type II secretory pathway and to pilus assembly. This is surprising, as it is hardly probable that strain ALA-1T lost all genes for flagellar assembly after the evolutionary separation of strain ALA-1T and its closely related sister species A. mobile from their last common ancestor. A similar situation has been observed in the non-motile strain Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius 104-IAT in comparison to several motile sister species in the genus Alicyclobacillus [24]. Here, the genome of the non-motile strain A. acidocaldarius 104-IAT still contains most of the genes needed for flagellar assembly [24]. Thus, the genotypic status of flagellar motility in the genus Aminobacterium remains unclear.

Chemotaxonomy

Ultrathin sections of strain ALA-1T revealed a thick cell wall with an external S-layer similar to that of Gram-positive type cell walls [1]. Unfortunately, no chemotaxonomic data have been published for the genus Aminobacterium. Among the organisms depicted in Figure 1, chemotaxonomic data are available for Dethiosulfovibrio peptidovorans, Jonquetella anthropi, Pyramidobacter piscolens, Cloacibacillus evryensis, and Synergistes jonesii, though the data are not always present in the original species description publications [25-27]. In major phenotypes, such as being strictly anaerobic and Gram-negative in staining within the usually Gram-positive Firmicutes, mostly also in their ability to degrade amino acids, the organisms shown in Figure 1 are highly similar, which may justify also a comparison in their chemotaxonomic features. The major fatty acids in different strains of Jonquetella are iso-C15:0 (25-43%) and C16:0 (14-21%), other iso-branched and unbranched fatty acids are present in smaller amounts, and anteiso-C15:0 is below 5% [26]. In Dethiosulfovibrio, the major fatty acid is iso-C15:0 (59.7%), followed by C18:0 (9.0%) and C16:0 (8.5%) [26]. Dethiosulfovibrio differs qualitatively from Jonquetella by the absence of anteiso branched fatty acids and by the presence of C18:1ω9c (3.0%) [26]. The major fatty acids in two strains of P. piscolens are C14:0 (16-19%) and C13:0 (12-14%) [27]. The cellular fatty acids of C. evryensis are characterized by a mixture of saturated, unsaturated, hydroxy- and cyclopropane fatty acids [25]. The major fatty acids were iso-C15:0 (16.6%), iso-C15:0 3-OH (12.4%) and C17:1ω6c (9.5%) [25]; the major fatty acids in its closest relative, Synergistes jonesii, were C15:0 (16.0%), C20cyc (14:0) and C17:1ω6c (9.0%) [25]. The polar fatty acid profile of C. evryensis (data not shown in the original publication) revealed diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidyl-ethanolamine and phosphatidylmonomethylamine [25].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [28], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [29]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [13] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

     Property

     Term

MIGS-31

     Finishing quality

     Finished

MIGS-28

     Libraries used

     Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library;     one 454 12kb pyrosequence library;     one Illumina 250bp library

MIGS-29

     Sequencing platforms

     454 GS FLX Titanium; Illumina GAii

MIGS-31.2

     Sequencing coverage

     85.5× 454 pyrosequence; 909 Mb Illumina data

MIGS-30

     Assemblers

     Newbler version 2.0.0-PostRelease-10/28/2008, phrap

MIGS-32

     Gene calling method

     Prodigal, GenePRIMP

     INSDC ID

     CP001997

     Genbank Date of Release

     April 5, 2010

     GOLD ID

     Gc01257

     NCBI project ID

     32587

     Database: IMG-GEBA

     2502082107

MIGS-13

     Source material identifier

     DSM 12261

     Project relevance

     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A. colombiense ALA-1T, DSM 12661, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 846 (Anaerobic serine/arginine medium) [30] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre MGP04100) adding additional 1µl lysozyme and 5 µl mutanolysin to the standard lysis solution for 40 min incubation at 37°C.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 909 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 283 bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 12 kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at Web Site. Draft assemblies were based on 169 Mb 454 draft data and 454 paired end data (543,550 reads). Newbler (version 2.0.0-PostRelease-10/28/2008 was used) parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial Newbler assembly contained 18 contigs in 1 scaffold. The initial 454 assembly was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with VELVET [31], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (Web Site) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (Web Site), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing [32]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J-F.Cheng, unpublished). A total of 113 additional Sanger reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [33] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [34]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [35].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 1,980,592 bp long chromosome with an overall GC content of 45.3% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 1,970 genes predicted, 1,914 were protein-coding genes, and 56 RNAs; 38 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (77.2%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute

Value

  % of Total

Genome size (bp)

1,980,592

  100.00%

DNA coding region (bp)

1,837,142

  92.76%

DNA G+C content (bp)

897,344

  45.31%

Number of replicons

1

Extrachromosomal elements

0

Total genes

1,970

  100.00%

RNA genes

56

  2.84%

rRNA operons

3

Protein-coding genes

1,914

  97.16%

Pseudo genes

38

  1.93%

Genes with function prediction

1,521

  77.21%

Genes in paralog clusters

225

  12.94%

Genes assigned to COGs

1,592

  80.81%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

1,617

  82.08%

Genes with signal peptides

337

  17.11%

Genes with transmembrane helices

540

  27.41%

CRISPR repeats

1

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code

   value

   %age

    Description

J

   150

   8.8

    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

   0

   0.0

    RNA processing and modification

K

   105

   6.1

    Transcription

L

   81

   4.7

    Replication, recombination and repair

B

   1

   0.1

    Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

   23

   1.3

    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

Y

   0

   0.0

    Nuclear structure

V

   23

   1.3

    Defense mechanisms

T

   51

   3.0

    Signal transduction mechanisms

M

   106

   6.2

    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

   5

   0.3

    Cell motility

Z

   0

   0.0

    Cytoskeleton

W

   0

   0.0

    Extracellular structures

U

   32

   1.9

    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport

O

   57

   3.3

    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

   129

   7.5

    Energy production and conversion

G

   118

   6.9

    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

   199

   11.6

    Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

   66

   3.9

    Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

   67

   3.9

    Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

   42

   2.5

    Lipid transport and metabolism

P

   98

   5.7

    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

   26

   1.5

    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

   207

   12.1

    General function prediction only

S

   126

   7.4

    Function unknown

-

   378

   19.2

    Not in COGs

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Maren Schröder (DSMZ) for growing A. colombiense cells. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy's Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, and UT-Battelle Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2 and SI 1352/1-2.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Baena S, Fardeau ML, Labat M, Ollivier B, Thomas P, Garcia JL and Patel BKC. Aminobacterium colombiense gen. nov. sp. nov., an amino acid-degrading anaerobe isolated from anaerobic sludge. Anaerobe. 1998; 4:241-250 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49:1325-1326 View Article
  3. Baena S, Fardeau ML, Labat M, Ollivier B, Garcia JL and Patel BKC. Aminobacterium mobile sp. nov., a new anaerobic amino-acid-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000; 50:259-264PubMed
  4. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:590-592 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Li T, Mazéas L, Sghir A, Leblon G and Bouchez T. Insights into networks of functional microbes catalysing methanization of cellulose under mesophilic conditions. Environ Microbiol. 2009; 11:889-904 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Tang Y, Shigematsu T, Morimura S and Kida K. Microbial community analysis of mesophilic anaerobic protein degradation process using bovine serum albumin (BSA)-fed continuous cultivation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005; 99:150-164 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK and Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:2259-2261 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  9. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Klenk HP and Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010; 33:175-182 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009; 5541:184-200 View Article
  13. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:D346-D354 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Chovatia M, Sikorski J, Schröder M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Tice H, Glavina Del Rio T, Copeland A, Cheng JF and Chen F. Complete genome sequence of Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans type strain (SU883T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:254-261 View Article
  15. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  16. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Jumas-Bilak E, Roudière L and Marchandin H. Description of 'Synergistetes' phyl. nov. and emended description of the phylum 'Deferribacteres' and of the family Syntrophomonadaceae, phylum 'Firmicutes'. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:1028-1035 View ArticlePubMed
  18. . 71. Validation and publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1999; 49:1325-1326
  19. Classification of Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups. TRBA 466.Web Site
  20. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  21. Adams CJ, Redmond MC and Valentine DL. Pure-culture growth of fermentative bacteria, facilitated by H2 removal: bioenergetics and H2 production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72:1079-1085 View ArticlePubMed
  22. Rees GN, Patel BKC, Grassia GS and Sheehy AJ. Anaerobaculum thermoterrenum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, thermophilic bacterium which ferments citrate. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:150-154 View ArticlePubMed
  23. Menes RJ and Muxi L. Anaerobaculum mobile sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, moderately thermophilic, peptide-fermenting bacterium that uses crotonate as an electron acceptor, and emended description of the genus Anaerobaculum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:157-164PubMed
  24. Mavromatis K, Sikorski J, Lapidus A, Rio TGD, Copeland A, Tice H, Cheng JF, Lucas S, Chen F and Nolan M. Complete genome sequence of Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius type strain (104-IAT). Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2:9-18 View Article
  25. Ganesan A, Chaussonnerie S, Tarrade A, Dauga C, Bouchez T, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D and Sghir A. Cloacibacillus evryensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel asaccharolytic, mesophilic, amino-acid-degrading bacterium within the phylum 'Synergistetes', isolated from an anaerobic sludge digester. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008; 58:2003-2012 View ArticlePubMed
  26. Jumas-Bilak E, Carlier JP, Jean-Pierre H, Citron D, Bernard K, Damay A, Gay B, Teyssier C, Campos J and Marchandin H. Jonquetella anthropi gen. nov., sp. nov., the first member of the candidate phylum 'Synergistetes' isolated from man. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:2743-2748 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Downes J, Vartoukian SR, Dewhirst FE, Izard J, Chen T, Yu WH, Sutcliffe IC and Wade WG. Pyramidobacter piscolens gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the phylum 'Synergistetes' isolated from the human oral cavity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:972-980 View ArticlePubMed
  28. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby JP, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO and Rossello-Mora R. The All-Species Living Tree project: A 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008; 31:241-250 View ArticlePubMed
  29. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060 View ArticlePubMed
  30. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  31. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  32. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter J, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F and Lucas S. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:12-20 View Article
  33. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  34. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed