Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Arcobacter nitrofigilis type strain (CIT)

  • Amrita Pati
  • , Sabine Gronow
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Alex Copeland
  • , Tijana Glavina Del Rio
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Hope Tice
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , Olga Chertkov,
  • , David Bruce,
  • , Roxanne Tapia,
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Konstantinos Liolios
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Miriam Land,
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Yun-Juan Chang,
  • , Cynthia D. Jeffries,
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Markus Göker
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • and Nikos C. Kyrpides
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.912121

Received: 15 June 2010

Published: 30 June 2010


Arcobacter nitrofigilis (McClung et al. 1983) Vandamme et al. 1991 is the type species of the genus Arcobacter in the family Campylobacteraceae within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The species was first described in 1983 as Campylobacter nitrofigilis [1] after its detection as a free-living, nitrogen-fixing Campylobacter species associated with Spartina alterniflora Loisel roots [2]. It is of phylogenetic interest because of its lifestyle as a symbiotic organism in a marine environment in contrast to many other Arcobacter species which are associated with warm-blooded animals and tend to be pathogenic. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a type stain of the genus Arcobacter. The 3,192,235 bp genome with its 3,154 protein-coding and 70 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.


symbioticSpartina alterniflora Loiselnitrogen fixationmicro-anaerophilicmotileCampylobacteraceaeGEBA


Strain CIT (= DSM 7299 = ATCC 33309 = CCUG 15893) is the type strain of the species Arcobacter nitrofigilis, which is the type species of the genus Arcobacter [1]. Strain CIT was isolated from roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel (cordgrass) growing in salty marshes at the East coast of Canada. It was the first description of an organism in this kind of habitat that belonged to the genus Campylobacter, as described based on phenotypic and biochemical traits [2]. The species epithet nitrofigilis means 'nitrogen-fixing' and is based on the outstanding characteristic of this species [3]. The new genus Arcobacter, meaning 'bow-shaped rod', was introduced in 1991 and its separation from the genus Campylobacter was based on DNA-DNA and DNA-rRNA hybridization [1]. Up to now, the genus Arcobacter comprises nine species, some of which are associated with warm-blooded animals whereas others are found in marine environments.

Within the Campylobacteraceae several whole-genome sequences have already been deciphered: A. butzleri strain RM4018 [4] (non type strain) is the only member of the genus Arcobacter, as well as genomes from seven species of the genus Campylobacter, and Sulfurospirillum deleyianum [5].

Only few additional strains belonging to the species A. nitrofigilis are known in the literature, with F2176 and F2173 [6] being the closest related ones (99% sequence identity). The type strains of the other species of the genus Arcobacter share 93.8-94.6% 16S rRNA sequence identity with strain CIT, whereas the type strains from other genera in the family Campylobacteraceae share less than 89% sequence identity with strain CIT [7]. There are plenty of phylotypes (uncultured bacteria) known from marine environments such as the ridges flanking crustal fluids in oceanic crust (AY704399, clone FD118-51B-02, 98.6%), sea water from Ishigaki port in Japan (AB262370/-71, 96.4%), a mangrove of the Danshui river estuary of northern Taiwan (DQ234254, 95.8%) [8], costal water in the Bohai Bay, China, (FJ155005, 95.8%), in Black Sea shelf sediments in Romania (AJ271655, 95.8%), or from activated sludge in New Zealand (EU104146, 95.8%). Environmental screens and marine metagenome libraries do not contain more than a handful of sequences with >93% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity indicating a sparse representation of closely related strains in the habitats analyzed (status March 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for A. nitrofigilis strain CIT, together with the description of the complete genome sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The four 16S rRNA gene sequences in the genome differ from each other by up to two nucleotides, and differ by up to three nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (L14627) generated from CCUG 15893, which contains nine ambiguous base calls.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT relative to the type strains of the other genera within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The tree was inferred from 1,379 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11,12] and rooted (as far as possible) in accordance with the current taxonomy [13]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 200 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome from S. deleyianum [5].

A. nitrofigilis cells are Gram-negative, bow-shaped or curved rods of 1–3 µm length and 0.2–0.9 µm width (Figure 2 and Table 1). Motility is based on a single, polar flagellum and results in rapid corkscrew motion. Older cultures also show coccoid cells [2]. The habitat of all known A. nitrofigilis isolates is either the roots or the sediment around the roots of S. alterniflora Loisel growing in salt marshes [3]. Although no pathogenic association has been described so far, A. nitrofigilis was among five Arcobacter species that were isolated from food samples such as meat and shellfish varieties [27]. The optimum growth temperature of A. nitrofigilis is 30°C, the temperature range is from 10–37°C [28]. Neither spores nor granules are present but a brown pigment is formed from tryptophan [2]. All strains of the species show positive reactions for nitrogenase, catalase and oxidase. Growth occurs under microaerophilic conditions with oxygen as terminal electron acceptor, under anaerobic conditions fumarate or aspartate are necessary, the presence of nitrate is detrimental [2]. Hydrogen is not necessary for growth [1]. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite and sulfide is produced from cysteine [3]. Strain CIT tested positive for urease, other strains of the species do not [3]. The metabolism of A. nitrofigilis is chemoorganotrophic; organic acids and amino acids are used as carbon sources but carbohydrates are neither oxidized nor fermented [2]. All strains of the species are halotolerant. They require a minimum of 0.5% NaCl for growth and can tolerate up to 7% NaCl [28]. A. nitrofigilis is susceptible to cephalothin and nalidixic acid but isresistant to vancomycin [3]. The G+C content of the DNA was determined by thermal denaturation to be 28.0% [3] which is slightly below the 28.4% found in the genome.

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT

Table 1

Classification and general features of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT according to the MIGS recommendations [17]




    Evidence code

    Current classification

     Domain Bacteria

    TAS [18]

     Phylum ‘Proteobacteria

    TAS [19]

     Class Epsilonproteobacteria

    TAS [20,21]

     Order Campylobacterales

    TAS [20,22]

     Family Campylobacteraceae

    TAS [23]

     Genus Arcobacter

    TAS [1]

     Species Arcobacter nitrofigilis

    TAS [1]

     Type strain CI

    TAS [3]

    Gram stain


    TAS [2]

    Cell shape

     bow-shaped rods

    TAS [2]



    TAS [2]



    TAS [2]

    Temperature range

     mesophile, 10-37°C

    TAS [2]

    Optimum temperature


    TAS [24]


     halotolerant up to 7% NaCl

    TAS [2]


    Oxygen requirement


    TAS [2]

    Carbon source

     organic and amino acids

    TAS [1]

    Energy source


    TAS [3]




    TAS [2]


    Biotic relationship


    TAS [2]





    Biosafety level


    TAS [25]


     roots of the marshplant Spartina alterniflora

    TAS [2]


    Geographic location

     Conrads Beach (Dartmouth),     Nova Scotia (Canada)

    TAS [2]


    Sample collection time

     about or before 1980

    TAS [2]


    Latitude    Longitude

     44.65     -63.60







     sea level

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.


The major respiratory quinones are menaquinone 6 and a second atypical menaquinone 6 that has not yet been clearly identified [1]. The major fatty acids in whole cells of A. nitrofigilis are hexadecenoic (C16:0), cis-9-hexadecenoic (cis-C16:1ϖ7c) and cis-9-octadecenoic acid (cis-C18:1ϖ7c) [24]

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [29], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [30]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [15] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information





   Finishing quality



   Libraries used

    Three genomic libraries: 454 pyro-sequence standard library,    454 pyro-sequence 24 kb PE library,    and Illumina stdandard library


   Sequencing platforms

    454 GS FLX, Illumina GAii


   Sequencing coverage

    43.5× pyrosequence, 15.7× Illumina



    Newbler version 2.0.0-    PostRelease-10/28/2008, phrap


   Gene calling method

    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP



   Genbank Date of Release

    May 18, 2010



   NCBI project ID


   Database: IMG-GEBA



   Source material identifier

    DSM 7299

   Project relevance

    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A. nitrofigilis strain CIT, DSM 7299, was grown on DSMZ medium 429 (Columbia agar including 5% horse blood) [31] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with lysis modification st/LALMP according to Wu et al. [30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 50 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 243 bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 24 kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at Web Site. Draft assembly was based on 138 Mb 454 standard and 454 paired end data (498,215 reads). Newbler (Roch, version 2.0.0-PostRelease-10/28/2008) parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial Newbler assembly contained 42 contigs in 3 scaffolds. It was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus and collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [32], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (Web Site) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (Web Site), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing [33]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J-F.Cheng, unpublished). A total of 480 additional Sanger reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [34] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [35]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [36].

Genome properties

The genome is 3,192,235 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with an overall G+C content of 28.4% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,224 genes predicted, 3,154 were protein-coding genes, and 70 RNAs; 28 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (72.1%) were assigned a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics



   % of Total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding region (bp)



DNA G+C content (bp)



Number of replicons


Extrachromosomal elements


Total genes



RNA genes



rRNA operons


Protein-coding genes



Pseudo genes



Genes with function prediction



Genes in paralog clusters



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes assigned Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats


Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories








    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




    RNA processing and modification








    Replication, recombination and repair




    Chromatin structure and dynamics




    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis




    Nuclear structure




    Defense mechanisms




    Signal transduction mechanisms




    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis




    Cell motility








    Extracellular structures




    Intracellular trafficking and secretion




    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




    Energy production and conversion




    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




    Amino acid transport and metabolism




    Nucleotide transport and metabolism




    Coenzyme transport and metabolism




    Lipid transport and metabolism




    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




    General function prediction only




    Function unknown




    Not in COGs



We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Sabine Welnitz for growing the A. nitrofigilis cells, and Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction and quality analysis (both at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, and UT-Battelle Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


  1. Vandamme P, Falsen E, Rossau R, Hoste B, Segers P, Tytgat RDE and Ley J. Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991; 41:88-103 View ArticlePubMed
  2. McClung CR and Patriquin DG. Isolation of a nitrogen-fixing Campylobacter species from the roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Can J Microbiol. 1980; 26:881-886 View ArticlePubMed
  3. McClung CR, Patriquin DG and Davis RE. Campylobacter nitrofigilis sp. nov. a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983; 33:605-612 View Article
  4. Miller WG, Parker CT, Rubenfeld M, Mendz GL, Wösten MMS, Ussery DW, Stolz JF, Binnewies TT, Hallin PF and Wang G. The complete genome sequence and analysis of the Epsilonproteobacterium Arcobacter butzleri. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2:e1358 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Sikorski J, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Lucas S, Chen F, Tice H, Cheng JF and Saunders E. Complete genome of Sulfurospirillum deleyianum type strain (5175T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2:149-157 View Article
  6. Figueras MJ, Collado L and Guarro J. A new 16S rRNA-RFLP method for the discrimination of the accepted species of Arcobacter. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 62:11-15 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK and Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:2259-2261 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Liao PC, Huang BH and Huang S. Microbial community composition of the Danshui river estuary of northern Taiwan and the practicality of the phylogenetic method in microbial barcoding. Microb Ecol. 2007; 54:497-507 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  10. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981; 17:368-376 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby JP, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO and Rossello-Mora R. The All-Species Living Tree project: A 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008; 31:241-250 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009; 5541:184-200 View Article
  15. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:D346-D354 View ArticlePubMed
  16. Baar C, Eppinger M, Raddatz G, Simon J, Lanz C, Klimmek O, Nandakumar R, Gross R, Rosinus A and Keller H. Complete genome sequence and analysis of Wolinella succinogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100:11690-11695 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thompson N, Allen MJ and Anguiuoli SV. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes: the “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  18. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  19. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119-169.
  20. . 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:1-6 View ArticlePubMed
  21. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class V. Epsilonproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.
  22. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order I. Campylobacterales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.
  23. Vandamme P and De Ley J. Proposal for a new family, Campylobacteraceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991; 41:451-455 View Article
  24. Donachie SP, Bowman JP, On SL and Alam M. Arcobacter halophilus sp. nov., the first obligate halophile in the genus Arcobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005; 55:1271-1277 View ArticlePubMed
  25. Classification of. Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups. TRBA 466.Web Site
  26. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Collado L, Guarro J and Figueras MJ. Prevalence of Arcobacter in meat and shellfish. J Food Prot. 2009; 72:1102-1106PubMed
  28. Tenover FC, Fennell CL. The genera Campylobacter and Helicobacter In: The Prokaryotes Vol. IV, 2nd ed. 1992, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  29. Klenk HP and Göker M. En route to a genome-based taxonomy of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010; 33:175-182 View ArticlePubMed
  30. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060 View ArticlePubMed
  31. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  32. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  33. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F and Lucas S. Complete genome of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:12-20 View Article
  34. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  36. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed