Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Methanoplanus petrolearius type strain (SEBR 4847T)

  • Evelyne Brambilla
  • , Olivier Duplex Ngatchou Djao
  • , Hajnalka Daligault
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Nancy Hammon
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Hope Tice
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Cliff Han
  • , Roxanne Tapia,
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Konstantinos Liolios
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Natalia Mikhailova
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Miriam Land,
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Yun-Juan Chang,
  • , Cynthia D. Jeffries,
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Stefan Spring
  • , Johannes Sikorski
  • , Markus Göker
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • and Hans-Peter Klenk
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1183143

Received: 27 October 2010

Published: 31 October 2010


Methanoplanus petrolearius Ollivier et al. 1998 is the type strain of the genus Methanoplanus. The strain was originally isolated from an offshore oil field from the Gulf of Guinea. Members of the genus Methanoplanus are of interest because they play an important role in the carbon cycle and also because of their significant contribution to the global warming by methane emission in the atmosphere. Like other archaea of the family Methanomicrobiales, the members of the genus Methanoplanus are able to use CO2 and H2 as a source of carbon and energy; acetate is required for growth and probably also serves as carbon source. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the family Methanomicrobiaceae and the sixth complete genome sequence from the order Methanomicrobiales. The 2,843,290 bp long genome with its 2,824 protein-coding and 57 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.


obligately anaerobicmesophilichydrogenmethaneGram-negativeMethanomicrobiaceaeEuryarchaeotaGEBA


Strain SEBR 4847T (= DSM 11571 = OCM 486) is the type strain of Methanoplanus petrolearius [1]. This strain was isolated from an offshore oil-producing well in the Gulf of Guinea, Africa [1]. Currently, the genus Methanoplanus contains three species: M. petrolearius, the type species M. limicola (isolated from an Italian swamp containing drilling waste near Baia in the Naples Area), and M. endosymbiosus (isolated from the marine ciliate Metopus contortus) [1]. The genus name derived from the Latin word “methanum”, and the adjective “planus”, meaning a flat plate, which refers to its flat cell morphology [1,2]. Methanoplanus therefore means “methane (-producing) plate”. The species epithet petrolearius derives from the Latin word “petra”, rock and the adjective “olearius”, which relates to vegetable oil [1]. “Petrolearius” means therefore related to mineral oil, referring to its origin of isolation [1]. No additional cultivated strains belonging to the species M. petrolearius have been described thus far. M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T is like other methanogens, strictly anaerobic. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for M. petrolearius strain SEBR 4847T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The type strains of the two other species in the genus Methanoplanus share an average of 93.5% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with strain SEBR 4847T [1,2]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the strain SEBR 4847T shows 99% identity with an uncultured environmental 16S rRNA gene sequence of the clone KO-Eth-A (AB236050) obtained from the marine sediment [3]. The 16S rRNA gene sequences similarities of the strain SEBR 4847T to metagenomic libraries (env_nt) were all 83% or less, (status August 2010), indicating that members of the species, genus and even family are poorly represented in the habitats screened thus far.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 11571 (U76631), which contained four ambiguous base calls.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T relative to the other type strains within the order Methanomicrobiales. The tree was inferred from 1,275 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [6] and rooted with Methanocellales [7]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 350 bootstrap replicates [8] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [9] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [10,11] and GenBank accessions CP001338 (for Methanosphaera palustris E1-9c) and AP011532 (for Methanocella paludicola).

The cells of strain SEBR 4847T stain Gram-negative, but archaea do not have a Gram-negative type of cell wall with an outer envelope. Cells occur singly or in pairs and are irregularly disc-shaped of 1 to 3 µm size (Figure 2 and Table 1). A similar shape was found for two other strains of the genus Methanoplanus [1,2,24]. Strain SEBR 4847T was originally described as non-motile [1], however, in samples of this strain kept in the DSMZ culture collection motile cells were frequently detected in young cultures (H. Hippe, personal communication). The genome sequence of SEBR 4847T contains numerous genes encoding flagellins (Mpet_2052 - Mpet2054, Mpet_2057) and chemotaxis proteins (Mpet_2064 – Mpet_2069), which is in line with the observation of motility in this species. Round colonies of 1-2 mm are observed after three weeks of incubation on solid agar medium. The generation time of strain SEBR 4847T is about 10 hours under optimal conditions [1]. Strain SEBR 4847T grows optimally at 37°C, the temperature range for growth being 28-43°C. No growth was observed at 25°C or 45°C [1]. The optimum pH is 7.0; growth occurs from pH 5.3 to 8.4. The optimum NaCl concentration for growth is between 1 and 3% NaCl with growth occurring at NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 5% [1]. Substrates for growth of strain SEBR 4847T are H2 + CO2, formate and CO2 + 2-propanol [1]. Strain SEBR 4847T does not utilize methanol, trimethylamine, lactate, glucose, CO2 + 1-propanol, CO2 + 1-butanol and isobutyrate [1]. Acetate is required for growth as carbon source and yeast extract is stimulatory [1]. Addition of acetate reduces the lag time [25]. The addition of acetate slightly increases the amount of H2 available, theoretically [26,27]. When H2 is limiting and sulfate is in excess, sulfate reducers compete with methanogens and homoacetogens for the available H2 [27]. The sulfate reducers can out-compete hydrogenotrophic methanogens, due to a higher affinity [28] and higher activity of hydrogenase and the energetically more favorable reduction of sulfate [29]. Similar features were observed for M. limicola and M. endosymbiosus [1,2,24].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T

Table 1

Classification and general features of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T according to the MIGS recommendations [12]




   Evidence code

     Current classification

   Domain Archaea

   TAS [13]

   Phylum Euryarchaeota

   TAS [14,15]

   Class Methanomicrobia

   TAS [16]

   Order Methanomicrobiales

   TAS [17-19]

   Family Methanomicrobiaceae

   TAS [17,18]

   Genus Methanoplanus

   TAS [2,20]

   Species Methanoplanus petrolearius

   TAS [1,21]

   Type strain SEBR 4847

   TAS [1]

     Gram stain


   TAS [2]

     Cell shape

   disc-shaped, irregular single or in pairs

   TAS [1]





   not reported


     Temperature range


   TAS [1]

     Optimum temperature


   TAS [1]


   1-3% NaCl

   TAS [1]


     Oxygen requirement

   anaerobic obligate

   TAS [1]

     Carbon source

   acetate, CO2, formate

   TAS [1]

     Energy source

   H2 + CO2, formate and CO2 + 2-propanol

   TAS [1]



   offshore oil field

   TAS [1]


     Biotic relationship

   not reported




   not reported


     Biosafety level


   TAS [22]


   subsurface ecosystem

   TAS [1]


     Geographic location

   offshore oil field, Gulf of Guinea, West Africa

   TAS [1]


     Sample collection time

   1997 or before

   TAS [1]


     Latitude     Longitude

   not reported




   not reported




   not reported


Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements


At the time of writing, no reports have been published describing the composition of the cell envelope of the strain SEBR 4847T. However, for the two other species in the genus Methanoplanus, M. limicola and M. endosymbiosus, several chemotaxonomic features have been reported [2,24]. Preparations of the cell envelope from M. limicola and M. endosymbiosius revealed the presence of a dominant band that appeared to be a glycoprotein when cells were disrupted in 2% SDS [2,24]. Methanoplanus spp. possesses a mixture of C20C20 and C40C40 core ethers [30]. For comparison, similar mixtures were also detected in other members of the family Methanomicrobiaceae: Methanogenium cariaci, Methanogenium marisnigri and Methanogenium thermophilicum, while C20C25 was absent in these species [30].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [31], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [32]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [9] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information





     Finishing quality



     Libraries used

    Tree genomic libraries:    454 pyrosequence standard library,     paired end 454 library (9.5 kb insert size),    Illumina GAii shotgun library


     Sequencing platforms

    454 GS FLX Titanium, Illumina GAii


     Sequencing coverage

    67.9 × pyrosequence, 52.2 × Illumina



    Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-09-14-2009, Velvet, phrap


     Gene calling method

    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP



     Genbank Date of Release

    September 17, 2010

     NCBI project ID


     GOLD ID


     Database: IMG-GEBA



     Source material identifier

    DSM 11571

     Project relevance

    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T, DSM 11571, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 141 (Methanogenium medium) [33] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.2 g of cell paste using a phenol/chloroform extraction after cell lysis with a mixture of lysozyme and mutanolysin.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (Web Site). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler Version 2.3 Pre-Release-09-14-2009 (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisted of 21 contigs in one scaffold that was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus sequence. Illumina GAii sequencing data (148.5Mb) was assembled with Velvet [34] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The draft assembly was based on 173.4 Mb of 454 data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (Web Site) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment of the genome sequence. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (Web Site), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) [35]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 139 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [36]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 120.1× coverage of the genome. The final assembly of the genoe contains 590,575 pyrosequences and 4,125,153 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [37] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [38]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [39].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,843,290 bp long chromosome with a 47.4% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,881 genes predicted, 2,825 were protein-coding genes, and 57 RNAs; thirty nine pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (61.2%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics



% of Total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding region (bp)



DNA G+C content (bp)



Number of replicons


Extrachromosomal elements


Total genes



RNA genes



rRNA operons


Protein-coding genes



Pseudo genes



Genes with function prediction



Genes in paralog clusters



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes assigned Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats


Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories








    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




    RNA processing and modification








    Replication, recombination and repair




    Chromatin structure and dynamics




    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning




    Nuclear structure




    Defense mechanisms




    Signal transduction mechanisms




    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis




    Cell motility








    Extracellular structures




    Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport




    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




    Energy production and conversion




    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




    Amino acid transport and metabolism




    Nucleotide transport and metabolism




    Coenzyme transport and metabolism




    Lipid transport and metabolism




    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




    General function prediction only




    Function unknown




    Not in COGs



We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Maren Schröder (DSMZ) for growing cultures of M. petrolearius. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


  1. Ollivier B, Cayol JL, Patel BKC, Magot M, Fardeau ML and Garcia JL. Methanoplanus petrolearius sp. nov., a novel methanogenic bacterium from an oil-producing well. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997; 147:51-56 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Wildgruber G, Thomm M, König H, Ober K, Ricchiuto T and Stetter KO. Methanoplanus limicola, a plate-shaped methanogen representing a novel family, the Methanoplanaceae. Arch Microbiol. 1982; 132:31-36 View Article
  3. Sakai S, Imachi H, Sekiguchi Y, Tseng IC, Ohashi A, Harada H and Kamagata Y. Cultivation of methanogens under low-hydrogen conditions by using the coculture method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75:4892-4896 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  5. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO and Rosselló-Móra R. The all-species living tree project: A 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008; 31:241-250 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009; 5541:184-200 View Article
  9. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N and Kyrpides NC. The genomes on line database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D475-D479 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Anderson IJ, Sieprawska-Lupa M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Copeland A, Glavina del Rio T, Tice H, Dalin E, Barry K and Saunders E. Complete genome sequence of Methanoculleus marisnigri Romesser et al. 1981 type strain JR1. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:189-196 View Article
  11. Anderson IJ, Sieprawska-Lupa M, Goltsman E, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina del Rio T, Tice H, Dalin E, Barry K and Pitluck S. Complete genome sequence of Methanocorpusculum labreanum type strain Z. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:197-203 View Article
  12. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  14. . Validation List no. 85. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:685-690 View ArticlePubMed
  15. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119-169.
  16. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Taxonomic Outline of the Procaryotes., Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition. Release 4.0, Fourth Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. p. 1-39.
  17. List 6. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1981; 31:215-218 View Article
  18. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR and Wolfe RS. Methanogens: Reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev. 1979; 43:260-296PubMed
  19. . The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales and Verrucomicrobiales are the genera Acholeplasma, Halanaerobium, Halobacterium, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanomicrobium, Planctomyces, Prochloron, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus, Thermoproteus and Verrucomicrobium, respectively. Opinion 79. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005; 55:517-518 View ArticlePubMed
  20. List 14. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1984; 34:270-271 View Article
  21. . Validation list 67. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998; 48:1083-1084 View Article
  22. Classification of bacteria and archaea in risk groups. TRBA 466.Web Site
  23. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  24. Bruggen JJA, Zwart KB, Hermans JGF, VanHove EM, Stumm CK and Vogels GD. Isolation and characterization of Methanoplanus endosymbiosus sp. nov., an endosymbiont of the marine sapropelic ciliate Metopus contortus Quennerstedt. Arch Microbiol. 1986; 144:367-374 View Article
  25. Wu SY, Chen SC and Lai MC. Methanofollis formosanus sp. nov., isolated from a fish pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005; 55:837-842 View ArticlePubMed
  26. He J, Sung Y, Dollhopf ME, Fatherpure BZ, Tiedje JM and Löffler FE. Acetate versus hydrogen as direct electron donors to stimulate the microbial reductive dechlorination process at chloroethene-contaminated sites. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36:3945-3952 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Weijma J, Gubbels F, Hulshoff LW, Stams AJM, Lens P and Lettinga G. Competition for H2 between sulfate reducers, methanogens and homoacetogens in a gas-lift reactor. Water Sci Technol. 2002; 45:75-80PubMed
  28. Boone DR and Bryant MP. Proprionate-degrading bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp.nov. gen.nov., from methanogenic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980; 40:626-632PubMed
  29. Lupton FS and Zeikus JG. Physiological basis for sulfate-dependent hydrogen competition between sulfidogens and methanogens. Curr Microbiol. 1984; 11:7-11 View Article
  30. Grant WD, Pinch G, Harris JE, Rosa MD and Gambacorta A. Polar lipids in methanogen taxonomy. J Gen Microbiol. 1985; 131:3277-3286
  31. Klenk HP and Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010; 33:175-182 View ArticlePubMed
  32. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060 View ArticlePubMed
  33. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  34. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter J, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F and Lucas S. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:12-20 View Article
  36. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008.
  37. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  38. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A gene prediction improvement pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  39. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed