Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Bacteroides helcogenes type strain (P 36-108T)

  • Amrita Pati
  • , Sabine Gronow
  • , Ahmet Zeytun,
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Nancy Hammon
  • , Shweta Deshpande
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Roxane Tapia,
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Konstantinos Liolios
  • , Ioanna Pagani
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Miriam Land,
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Yun-Juan Chang,
  • , Cynthia D. Jeffries,
  • , John C. Detter
  • , Evelyne Brambilla
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Markus Göker
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz,
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • and Susan Lucas
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1513795

Received: 22 February 2011

Published: 04 March 2011

Abstract

Bacteroides helcogenes Benno et al. 1983 is of interest because of its isolated phylogenetic location and, although it has been found in pig feces and is known to be pathogenic for pigs, occurrence of this bacterium is rare and it does not cause significant damage in intensive animal husbandry. The genome of B. helcogenes P 36-108T is already the fifth completed and published type strain genome from the genus Bacteroides in the family Bacteroidaceae. The 3,998,906 bp long genome with its 3,353 protein-coding and 83 RNA genes consists of one circular chromosome and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords:

strictly anaerobicmesophilicnonmotileGram-negativechemoorganotrophicpig abscessanimal pathogenBacteroidaceaeGEBA

Introduction

Strain P 36-108T (= DSM 20613 = ATCC 35417 = JCM 6297) is the type strain of Bacteroides helcogenes, one of currently 39 species in the genus Bacteroides [1,2]. The species epithet of B. helcogenes is derived from the Greek noun helkos meaning ‘abscess’ and the Greek verb gennaio meaning ‘produce’, referring to the pathogenic, probably intestinal, abscess-producing properties of the species [2]. B. helcogenes strain P36-108T was isolated from a pig abscess in Japan, and described by Benno et al. in 1983 [2]. Nine further isolates of B. helcogenes have been obtained from pig abscesses whereas two other isolates originated from pig feces. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. helcogenes P 36-108T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of B. helcogenes was compared using NCBI BLAST under default values (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [3] and the relative frequencies, weighted by BLAST scores, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [4]) were determined. The single most frequent genus was Bacteroides (100%) (33 hits in total). Regarding the 21 hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 92.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 84.5%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was Bacteroides ovatus, which corresponded to an identity of 93.4% and a HSP coverage of 86.6%. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AM275453 ('fecal microbiota irritable bowel syndrome patients differs significantly from that of healthy subjects'), which showed an identity of 95.5% and a HSP coverage of 84.3%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'human' (11.0%), 'fecal' (9.5%), 'microbiota' (8.8%), 'sequenc' (5.4%) and 'gut' (5.4%) (217 hits in total). The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were 'fecal/human' (13.3%), 'feedlot' (5.2%), 'bowel, faecal, healthi, irrit, microbiota, patient, significantli, subject, syndrom' (2.7%) and 'beef, cattl, coli, escherichia, feedbunk, habitat, marc, materi, neg, pen, primari, secondari, stec, surfac, synecolog, top, west' (2.6%) (6 hits in total). Most of these keywords are in accordance with the isolation sites of the different isolates and strongly suggest that B. helcogenes, like many other species of the genus Bacteroides, is associated with the intestinal tract of the host in the case of B. helcogenes, this host is the pig [2].

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of B. helcogenes P 36-108T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the five 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by up to 20 nucleotides, and differ by up to 13 nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB200227).

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of B. helcogenes relative to those type strains within the genus that appeared within a monophyletic Bacteroides main clade in preliminary analyses. Note that several of the Bacteroides type strain 16S rRNA sequences (from B. cellulosolvens, B. galacturonicus, B. pectinophilus, B. vulgatus) did not cluster together with this clade (data not shown, but see [5]) and were omitted from the main phylogenetic inference analysis. The same holds for the sequence from Anaerorhabdus furcosa (GU585668; also Bacteroidaceae). Other Bacteroides species lacked a sufficiently long 16S rRNA sequence and also had to be omitted (B. coagulans, B. xylanolyticus). The tree was inferred from 1,414 aligned characters [6,7] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [8] and rooted with the type strain of the family 'Prevotellaceae'. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [9] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are shown in blue, published genomes [11] and Prevotella melaninogenica released Genbank accession CP002122 in bold.

The cells of B. helcogenes generally have the shape of short rods (0.5-0.6 μm × 0.8-4.0 µm) which occur singly or in pairs (Figure 2). B. helcogenes is a Gram-negative, non-pigmented and non spore-forming bacterium (Table 1). The organism is originally described as nonmotile and only five genes associated with motility have been found in the genome (see below). The organism grows well at 37°C but does not grow at 4°C or at 45°C [2]. B. helcogenes is strictly anaerobic, chemoorganotrophic and is able to ferment glucose, mannose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, maltose, cellobiose, lactose, xylose, melibiose, raffinose, starch, glycogen, salicin, amygdalin, and xylan [2]. The organism hydrolyzes esculin and starch but does not digest casein, liquify gelatin, reduce nitrate nor produce indole from tryptophan [2]. B. helcogenes does not utilize arabinose, ramnose, ribose, trehalose, inulin, glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, inositol, adonitol, erythritol or gum Arabic [2]. It does not require hemin for growth but does require the presence of CO2; it does not show hemolysis. Growth is not enhanced by the addition of 20% bile [2]. Major fermentation products from PYFG broth (peptone yeast extract Fildes glucose broth [26]) are acetic acid and succinic acid; propionic and isobutyric acid are produced in small amounts [2]. B. helcogenes is phosphatase, DNase, β-glucuronidase, and glutamic acid decarboxylase active and urease, catalase, lecithinase and lipase inactive [2]. The organism produces ammonium and chondroitin sulfatase [2]. B. helcogenes can grow in the presence of kanamycin (1mg/ml), vancomycin (10 µg/ml), colistin (10 µg/ml), erythromycin (60 µg/ml) or polymyxin B (10 µg/ml) but not in the presence of cepharothin (10 µg/ml) or Brilliant green (0.001%) [2].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of B. helcogenes P 36-108T

Table 1

Classification and general features of B. helcogenes P 36-108T according to the MIGS recommendations [12].

MIGS ID

    Property

    Term

    Evidence code

    Current classification

    Domain Bacteria

    TAS [13]

    Phylum Bacteroidetes

    TAS [14]

    Class 'Bacteroidia'

    TAS [15]

    Order 'Bacteroidales'

    TAS [16]

    Family Bacteroidaceae

    TAS [17,18]

    Genus Bacteroides

    TAS [17,19-22]

    Species Bacteroides helcogenes

    TAS [2,23]

    Type strain P 36-108

    TAS [2]

    Gram stain

    negative

    TAS [2]

    Cell shape

    rod-shaped, single or in pairs

    TAS [2]

    Motility

    non-motile

    TAS [2]

    Sporulation

    none

    TAS [2]

    Temperature range

    mesophile

    TAS [2]

    Optimum temperature

    37°C

    TAS [2]

    Salinity

    normal

    TAS [2]

MIGS-22

    Oxygen requirement

    strictly anaerobic

    TAS [2]

    Carbon source

    carbohydrates

    TAS [2]

    Energy source

    chemoorganotroph

    TAS [2]

MIGS-6

    Habitat

    host

    TAS [2]

MIGS-15

    Biotic relationship

    free-living

    TAS [2]

MIGS-14

    Pathogenicity

    animal pathogen

    TAS [2]

    Biosafety level

    2

    TAS [24]

    Isolation

    Sus scrofa abscess

    TAS [2]

MIGS-4

    Geographic location

    Japan

    TAS [2]

MIGS-5

    Sample collection time

    1974

    TAS [2]

MIGS-4.1

    Latitude

    not reported

    NAS

MIGS-4.2

    Longitude

    not reported

    NAS

MIGS-4.3

    Depth

    not reported

    NAS

MIGS-4.4

    Altitude

    not reported

    NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [25]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

Little chemotaxonomic information is available for strain P 36-108T. Thus far, only the fatty acid composition has been elucidated. The major fatty acids found (>10%) were anteiso-C15:0, C15:0 and iso-C15:0.3-OH. Also, iso-C15:0, C16:0, and cis C18:1 were detected in a proportion ranging between 5% to 10% of the total fatty acids (unpublished data).

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [27], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [28]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [10] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

    Property

    Term

MIGS-31

    Finishing quality

    Finished

MIGS-28

    Libraries used

    Three genomic libraries:    one 454 pyrosequence standard library,    one 454 PE library (9 kb insert size),    one Illumina library

MIGS-29

    Sequencing platforms

    Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

    Sequencing coverage

    56.3 × Illumina; 36.7 × pyrosequence

MIGS-30

    Assemblers

    Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-10-21-2009-gcc-4.1.2-threads,    Velvet, phrap

MIGS-32

    Gene calling method

    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP

    INSDC ID

    CP002352

    Genbank Date of Release

    January 18, 2011

    GOLD ID

    Gc01593

    NCBI project ID

    41913

    Database: IMG-GEBA

    2503538016

MIGS-13

    Source material identifier

    DSM 20613

    Project relevance

    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

B. helcogenes P 36-108T, DSM 20613, was grown anaerobically in medium 104 (PYG Medium) [29] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [28]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [30,31].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [32]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.3-PreRelease-10-21-2009-gcc-4.1.2-threads (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 48 contigs in two scaffolds was converted into a phrap assembly by [33] making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (225.3 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [34] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 146.7 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [33] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [32], Dupfinisher [35], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 160 additional reactions and 4 shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [36]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 93 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 500,148 pyrosequence and 6,257,254 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [37] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [38]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [39].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 3,998,906 bp long chromosome with a GC content of 44.7% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,436 genes predicted, 3,353 were protein-coding genes, and 83 RNAs; 109 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (64.5%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics

    Attribute

    Value

     % of Total

    Genome size (bp)

    3,998,906

     100.00%

    DNA coding region (bp)

    3,583,947

     89.62%

    DNA G+C content (bp)

    1,788,209

     44.72%

    Number of replicons

    1

     100.00%

    Extrachromosomal elements

    0

    Total genes

    3,436

     100.00%

    RNA genes

    83

     2.42%

    rRNA operons

    5

    Protein-coding genes

    3,353

     97.58%

    Pseudo genes

    109

     3.17%

    Genes with function prediction

    2,215

     64.46%

    Genes in paralog clusters

    454

     13.21%

    Genes assigned to COGs

    2103

     61.20%

    Genes assigned Pfam domains

    2360

     68.68%

    Genes with signal peptides

    980

     28.52%

    Genes with transmembrane helices

    798

     23.22%

    CRISPR repeats

    1

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code

   value

   %age

      Description

J

   147

   6.5

      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

   0

   0

      RNA processing and modification

K

   157

   6.9

      Transcription

L

   125

   5.5

      Replication, recombination and repair

B

   0

   0

      Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

   20

   0.9

      Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

Y

   0

   0

      Nuclear structure

V

   67

   2.9

      Defense mechanisms

T

   125

   5.5

      Signal transduction mechanisms

M

   245

   10.8

      Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

N

   5

   0.2

      Cell motility

Z

   0

   0

      Cytoskeleton

W

   0

   0

      Extracellular structures

U

   48

   2.1

      Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport

O

   66

   2.9

      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

   120

   5.3

      Energy production and conversion

G

   185

   8.1

      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

   149

   6.5

      Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

   67

   2.9

      Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

   120

   5.3

      Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

   64

   2.8

      Lipid transport and metabolism

P

   161

   7.6

      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

   20

   0.9

      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

   266

   11.7

      General function prediction only

S

   122

   5.4

      Function unknown

-

   1,333

   38.8

      Not in COGs

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Sabine Welnitz (DSMZ) for growing B. helcogenes cultures. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Garrity G. NamesforLife. BrowserTool takes expertise out of the database and puts it right in the browser. Microbiol Today. 2010; 7:1
  2. Benno Y, Watabe J and Mitsuoka T. Bacteroides pyogenes sp. nov., Bacteroides suis sp. nov., and Bacteroides helcogenes sp. nov., new species from abscesses and feces of pigs. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1983; 4:396-407
  3. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P and Andersen GL. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72:5069-5072 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Porter MF. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: electronic library and information systems 1980; 14:130-137.
  5. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO and Rosselló-Móra R. The all-species living tree project: A 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008; 31:241-250 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  8. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009; 5541:184-200 View Article
  10. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:D346-D354 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Patrick S, Crossman LC, Blakely G, Abratt V, Lennard N, Poxton I, Duerden B, Harris B and Quail MA. Extensive DNA inversions in the B. fragilis genome control variable gene expression. Science. 2005; 307:1463-1465 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1. Springer, New York 2001:119-169.
  15. Ludwig W, Euzeby J, Whitman WG. Draft taxonomic outline of the Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Chlamydiae, Spirochaetes, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Dictyoglomi, and Gemmatimonadetes Taxonomic Outline 2008.Web Site
  16. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Taxonomic Outline of the Archaea and Bacteria In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 155-166.
  17. Skerman VBD, McGowan V and Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980; 30:225-420 View Article
  18. Pribram E. Klassification der Schizomyceten. Klassifikation der Schizomyceten (Bakterien), Franz Deuticke, Leipzig, 1933, p. 1-143.
  19. Castellani A, Chalmers AJ. Genus Bacteroides Castellani and Chalmers, 1918. Manual of Tropical Medicine, Third Edition, Williams, Wood and Co., New York, 1919, p. 959-960.
  20. Holdeman LV, Moore WEC. Genus I. Bacteroides Castellani and Chalmers 1919, 959. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 385-404.
  21. Cato EP, Kelley RW, Moore WEC and Holdeman LV. Bacteroides zoogleoformans, Weinberg, Nativelle, and Prévot 1937) corrig. comb. nov.: emended description. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1982; 32:271-274 View Article
  22. Shah HN and Collins MD. Proposal to restrict the genus Bacteroides (Castellani and Chalmers) to Bacteroides fragilis and closely related species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989; 39:85-87 View Article
  23. Validation List no. 12. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983; 33:896-897 View Article
  24. Classification of bacteria and archaea in risk groups. TRBA 466.Web Site
  25. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  26. Saito H and Miura K. Preparation of transfroming deoxyribonucleic acid by phenol treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963; 72:619-629 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Klenk HP and Goeker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010; 33:175-182 View ArticlePubMed
  28. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060 View ArticlePubMed
  29. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  30. Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG and Wägele JW. The DNA Bank Network: the start from a German initiative. Biopreservation and Biobanking.. (In press).
  31. . Web Site
  32. . Web Site
  33. Phrap and Phred for Windows. MacOS, Linux, and Unix. Web Site
  34. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Han C, Chain P. 2006. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. in Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics & computational biology. Edited by Hamid R. Arabnia & Homayoun Valafar, CSREA Press. June 26-29, 2006: 141-146.
  36. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008.
  37. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  38. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  39. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed