Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Staphylothermus hellenicus P8T

  • Iain Anderson
  • , Reinhard Wirth
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Alex Copeland
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Lynne Goodwin,
  • , Samuel Pitluck
  • , Karen Davenport,
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , Roxanne Tapia,
  • , Miriam Land
  • , Loren Hauser
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Natalia Mikhailova
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • , Nikos Kyrpides
  • and Natalia Ivanova
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2054696

Received: 23 September 2011

Published: 15 October 2011

Abstract

Staphylothermus hellenicus belongs to the order Desulfurococcales within the archaeal phylum Crenarchaeota. Strain P8T is the type strain of the species and was isolated from a shallow hydrothermal vent system at Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece. It is a hyperthermophilic, anaerobic heterotroph. Here we describe the features of this organism together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 1,580,347 bp genome with its 1,668 protein-coding and 48 RNA genes was sequenced as part of a DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) Laboratory Sequencing Program (LSP) project.

Keywords:

ArchaeaCrenarchaeotaDesulfurococcaceaehyperthermophilehydrothermal ventanaerobe

Introduction

Strain P8T (=DSM 12710 = JCM 10830) is the type strain of the species Staphylothermus hellenicus. It was isolated from a shallow hydrothermal vent at Palaeochori Bay near the island of Milos, Greece [1]. There is one other validly named species in the genus, S. marinus, for which a complete genome sequence has been determined and published [2,3]. The S. hellenicus genome is the ninth to be published from the order Desulfurococcales in the phylum Crenarchaeota. The only other genus in the Desulfurococcales for which two species have been sequenced is Desulfurococcus. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic position of S. hellenicus with respect to the other species in the order Desulfurococcales.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. hellenicus relative to the type strains of the other species within the order Desulfurococcales. The tree was inferred from 1,333 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [6]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [7] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [8] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [9] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are labeled with one asterisk, those listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks.

Organism information

S. hellenicus was isolated from sediment at Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece [1]. For isolation, 1 ml of sediment was added to half-strength SME medium [11] with 2% elemental sulfur and incubated at 90°C under H2/CO2. Colonies were isolated on plates with the same medium and with 1% Phytagel and 2-3% sodium alginate added [1]. S. hellenicus is a regular-shaped coccus (Figure 2) which can form large aggregates of up to fifty cells, similar to S. marinus [1,12]. No flagella were observed and cells were nonmotile. The temperature range for growth of S. hellenicus is 70-90°C, with an optimum at 85°C [1]. The salinity range was from 2% to 8% NaCl, and the optimum was 4% NaCl [1]. The pH range for growth was from 4.5 to 7.5. The optimum pH was 6.0 [1]. S. hellenicus is a strict anaerobe, and can grow under H2/CO2 or N2/CO2 [1]. It is a heterotroph which grows well on yeast extract but poorly on peptone [1]. Many carbon sources were tested, but no growth was observed, showing that a complex nutrient source is required [1]. Elemental sulfur was required for growth [1]. The features of the organism are listed in Table 1.

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of S. hellenicus P8T.

Table 1

Classification and general features of S. hellenicus P8T according to the MIGS recommendations [13]

MIGS ID

  Property

   Term

   Evidence codea

  Current classification

   Domain Archaea

   TAS [14]

   Phylum Crenarchaeota

   TAS [15,16]

   Class Thermoprotei

   TAS [16,17]

   Order Desulfurococcales

   TAS [16,18]

   Family Desulfurococcaceae

   TAS [19-21]

   Genus Staphylothermus

   TAS [12,22]

   Species Staphylothermus hellenicus

   TAS [1]

   Type strain P8

   TAS [1]

  Cell shape

   coccus

   TAS [1]

  Motility

   nonmotile

   TAS [1]

  Sporulation

   nonsporulating

   NAS

  Temperature range

   70-90°C

   TAS [1]

  Optimum temperature

   85°C

   TAS [1]

MIGS-6.3

  Salinity

   2-8% NaCl (optimum 4%)

   TAS [1]

MIGS-22

  Oxygen requirement

   anaerobe

   TAS [1]

  Carbon source

   yeast extract

   TAS [1]

  Energy metabolism

   heterotrophic

   TAS [1]

MIGS-6

  Habitat

   marine geothemally heated areas

   TAS [1]

MIGS-15

  Biotic relationship

   free-living

   TAS [1]

MIGS-14

  Pathogenicity

   none

   NAS

  Biosafety level

   1

   NAS

  Isolation

   geothermally heated sediment

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4

  Geographic location

   Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece

   TAS [1]

MIGS-5

  Isolation time

   September 1996

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2

  Latitude  longitude

   36.674   24.517

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4.3

  Depth

   4-10 m

   TAS [1]

MIGS-4.4

  Altitude

   not applicable

a) Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [23].

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and is part of a Laboratory Sequencing Project (LSP) to sequence diverse archaea. The genome project is listed in the Genomes On Line Database [10] and the complete genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing, and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

  Property

    Term

MIGS-31

  Finishing quality

    Finished

MIGS-28

  Libraries used

    Illumina standard library, 454 standard library, 454 28 kb paired end library

MIGS-29

  Sequencing platforms

    Illumina GA II, 454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

  Sequencing coverage

    462× with Illumina, 132× with 454

MIGS-30

  Assemblers

    Velvet, Newbler, phrap

MIGS-32

  Gene calling method

    Prodigal, GenePRIMP

  INSDC ID

    CP002051

  Genbank Date of Release

    June 1, 2010

  GOLD ID

    Gc01350

  NCBI project ID

    33683

MIGS-13

  Source material identifier

    DSM 12710

  Project relevance

    Phylogenetic diversity, biotechnology

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

S. hellenicus P8T cells were grown in a 300 liter fermenter at 85°C in SME medium [11] with 0.1% yeast extract, 0.1% peptone, and 0.7% elemental sulfur under a 200 kPa N2 atmosphere. DNA was isolated with a Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of S. hellenicus was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GA II shotgun library with reads of 730 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 310.5 +/- 187.8 bases, and a paired end 454 library with an average insert size of 28 Kb were generated for this genome. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [24], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data with Newbler. Draft assemblies were based on 208 Mb 454 draft data.

The initial Newbler assembly contained 4 contigs in 1 scaffold. We converted the initial 454 assembly into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment [25-27] in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher [28], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks. A total of 23 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [29], followed by a round of manual curation using GenePRIMP [30]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [31] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using BLASTn against the ribosomal RNA databases. The RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL [32]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform [33] developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA [34].

Genome properties

The genome includes one chromosome and no plasmids, for a total size of 1,580,437 bp (Table 3 and Figure 3). This genome size is close to the average for Desulfurococcales. The GC percentage is 36.8%, which is lower than most of the Desulfurococcales. A total of 1,716 genes were identified: 48 RNA genes and 1,668 protein-coding genes. There are 69 pseudogenes, comprising 4.1% of the protein-coding genes. About 62% of predicted genes begin with ATG, 30% begin with TTG, and 7% begin with GTG. There is one copy of each ribosomal RNA. Table 4 shows the distribution of genes in COG categories.

Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute

  Value

  % of totala

Size (bp)

  1,580,437

  100.0%

G+C content (bp)

  582,173

  36.8%

Coding region (bp)

  1,383,053

  87.5%

Number of replicons

  1

Extrachromosomal elements

  0

Total genes

  1,716

RNA genes

  48

rRNA operons

  1

Protein-coding genes

  1,668

  100.0%

Pseudogenes

  69

  4.1%

Genes with function prediction

  975

  58.5%

Genes in paralog clusters

  98

  5.9%

Genes assigned to COGs

  1,093

  65.5%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

  1,135

  68.0%

Genes with signal peptides

  129

  7.7%

Genes with transmembrane helices

  342

  20.5%

CRISPR repeats

  3

  % of totala

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, and GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

  Value

   %agea

    Description

J

  161

   9.7

    Translation

A

  2

   0.1

    RNA processing and modification

K

  59

   3.5

    Transcription

L

  72

   4.3

    Replication, recombination and repair

B

  2

   0.1

    Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

  7

   0.4

    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

  0

   0.0

    Nuclear structure

V

  18

   1.1

    Defense mechanisms

T

  20

   1.2

    Signal transduction mechanisms

M

  39

   2.3

    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

  4

   0.2

    Cell motility

Z

  0

   0.0

    Cytoskeleton

W

  0

   0.0

    Extracellular structures

U

  11

   0.7

    Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

  49

   2.9

    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

  79

   4.7

    Energy production and conversion

G

  79

   4.7

    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

  73

   4.4

    Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

  44

   2.6

    Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

  53

   3.2

    Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

  15

   0.9

    Lipid transport and metabolism

P

  67

   4.0

    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

  5

   0.3

    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

  194

   11.6

    General function prediction only

S

  116

   7.0

    Function unknown

-

  575

   34.5

    Not in COGs

a) The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Comparison with the S. marinus genome

The genome of S. hellenicus is slightly larger than the genome of S. marinus (1.58 Mbp vs. 1.57 Mbp), and the number of protein-coding genes is also larger (1668 vs. 1610). However, the number of pseudogenes is also higher in S. hellenicus (69 vs. 40). Some of the COG categories show different numbers of genes between the two organisms. S. hellenicus has 25 additional genes that do not belong to COGs. S. hellenicus has greater numbers of genes involved in cell wall biogenesis (39 vs. 23), nucleotide transport and metabolism (44 vs. 39) and carbohydrate transport and metabolism (79 vs. 72), while S. marinus has greater numbers of genes in the categories of energy production and conversion (92 vs. 79) and inorganic ion transport and metabolism (85 vs. 67).

The genes involved in cell wall metabolism that are in S. hellenicus but not in S. marinus are genes involved in nucleotide-sugar metabolism and glycosyltransferases, suggesting that S. hellenicus may have a greater variety of sugars attached to glycolipids and glycoproteins. Most of the additional S. hellenicus genes are located within a region of fifty genes on the chromosome (Shell_0865-Shell_0915) that is not present in S. marinus. The additional genes in S. hellenicus involved in nucleotide metabolism include adenylosuccinate synthase, adenylosuccinate lyase, and GMP synthase. Both S. hellenicus and S. marinus lack de novo purine synthesis, but the presence of these three additional enzymes suggests that S. hellenicus may be able to synthesize AMP and GMP from IMP, while S. marinus is unable to do so. The additional genes in carbohydrate transport and metabolism include nucleotide-sugar modifying enzymes that were also included in cell wall metabolism, but they also include a probable β-1,4-endoglucanase (cellulase) from glycosyl hydrolase family 5.

The genes found in S. marinus but not in S. hellenicus belong to the categories of energy production and conversion, and inorganic ion transport and metabolism. They include proteins related to subunits of multisubunit cation:proton antiporters and proteins related to subunits of NADH dehydrogenase and formate hydrogen lyase. These proteins are similar to subunits of mbh, a multisubunit membrane-bound hydrogenase from Pyrococcus furiosus [35], and mbx, a multisubunit complex of unknown function that probably has a role in sulfur reduction, also from P. furiosus [36]. S. marinus has three operons related to mbh and mbx, while S. hellenicus has only one, suggesting that the three operons may be redundant in function in S. marinus. Since S. marinus and S. hellenicus lack other enzymes involved in sulfur reduction, it is possible that these mbh/mbx-related operons play a role in sulfur reduction in these organisms.

Declarations


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Arab H, Völker H and Thomm M. Thermococcus aegaeicus sp. nov. and Staphylothermus hellenicus sp. nov., two novel hyperthermophilic archaea isolated from geothermally heated vents off Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000; 50:2101-2108 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Anderson IJ, Dharmarajan L, Rodriguez J, Hooper S, Porat I, Ulrich LE, Elkins JG, Mavromatis K, Sun H and Land M. The complete genome sequence of Staphylothermus marinus reveals differences in sulfur metabolism among heterotrophic Crenarchaeota. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:145 View ArticlePubMed
  3. Anderson IJ, Sun H, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Tice H, Dalin E, Lucas S, Barry K and Land M. Complete genome sequence of Staphylothermus marinus Stetter and Fiala 1986 type strain F1. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:183-188 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552PubMed
  5. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Hess PN and De Moraes Russo CA. An empirical test of the midpoint rooting method. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2007; 92:669-674 View Article
  8. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 2010; 17:337-354 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0 b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 2002.
  10. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:D346-D354 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Stetter KO, König H and Stackebrandt E. Pyrodictium gen. nov., a new genus of submarine disc-shaped sulfur reducing archaebacteria growing optimally at 105°C. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1983; 4:535-551
  12. Fiala G, Stetter KO, Jannasch HW, Langworthy TA and Madon J. Staphylothermus marinus sp. nov. represents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic submarine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98°C. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1986; 8:106-113
  13. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  15. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Phylum AI. Crenarchaeota phy. nov. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Edited by: Garrity GM, Boone DR and Castenholz RW. Springer, New York 2001: 169-210.
  16. . Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Validation List no. 85. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:685-690 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Reysenbach AL. Class I. Thermoprotei class. nov. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Edited by: Garrity GM, Boone DR, and Castenholz RW. Springer, New York; 2001: 169.
  18. Huber H, Stetter O. Order II. Desulfurococcales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 179-180.
  19. Burggraf S, Huber H and Stetter KO. Reclassification of the crenarchael orders and families in accordance with 16S rRNA sequence data. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:657-660 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Zillig W, Stetter KO, Prangishvilli D, Schäfer W, Wunderl S, Janekovic D, Holz I, Palm P. Desulfurococcaceae, the second family of the extremely thermophilic, anaerobic, sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektioskr Hyg Abt 1 Orig 1982; 3:304-317.
  21. . Validation List no. 10. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983; 33:438-440 View Article
  22. . Validation List no. 22. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1986; 36:573-576 View Article
  23. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  24. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  25. Ewing B and Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probablilities. Genome Res. 1998; 8:186-194PubMed
  26. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC and Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998; 8:175-185PubMed
  27. Gordon D, Abajian C and Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998; 8:195-202PubMed
  28. Han C, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics and computational biology, ed. Arabnia HR, Valafar H. CSREA Press, 2006:141-146.
  29. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Lacascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  30. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  31. Lowe TM and Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25:955-964 View ArticlePubMed
  32. INFERNAL. Inference of RNA alignments. Web Site
  33. The Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform. Web Site
  34. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Silva PJ, van den Ban EC, Wassink H, Haaker H, de Castro B, Robb FT and Hagen WR. Enzymes of hydrogen metabolism in Pyrococcus furiosus. Eur J Biochem. 2000; 267:6541-6551 View ArticlePubMed
  36. Schut GJ, Bridger SL and Adams MWW. Insights into the metabolism of elemental sulfur by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus: characterization of a coenzyme A-dependent NAD(P)H sulfur oxidoreductase. J Bacteriol. 2007; 189:4431-4441 View ArticlePubMed