Open Access

Complete genome sequence of the orange-red pigmented, radioresistant Deinococcus proteolyticus type strain (MRPT)

  • Alex Copeland
  • , Ahmet Zeytun,
  • , Montri Yassawong
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Susan Lucas
  • , Nancy Hammon
  • , Shweta Deshpande
  • , Jan-Fang Cheng
  • , Cliff Han,
  • , Roxanne Tapia,
  • , Lynne A. Goodwin,
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Konstantinos Liolios
  • , Ioanna Pagani
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Natalia Mikhailova
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Krishna Palaniappan
  • , Miriam Land,
  • , Loren Hauser,
  • , Cynthia D. Jeffries,
  • , Evelyne-Marie Brambilla
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Johannes Sikorski
  • , Rüdiger Pukall
  • , Markus Göker
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , James Bristow
  • , Jonathan A. Eisen,
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Philip Hugenholtz,
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • and Alla Lapidus
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2756060

Received: 27 April 2012

Published: 25 May 2012


Deinococcus proteolyticus (ex Kobatake et al. 1973) Brook and Murray 1981 is one of currently 47 species in the genus Deinococcus within the family Deinococcaceae. Strain MRPT was isolated from feces of Lama glama and possesses extreme radiation resistance, a trait is shares with various other species of the genus Deinococcus, with D. proteolyticus being resistant up to 1.5 Mrad of gamma radiation. Strain MRPT is of further interest for its carotenoid pigment. The genome presented here is only the fifth completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Deinococcus (and the forth type strain) to be published, and will hopefully contribute to a better understanding of how members of this genus adapted to high gamma- or UV ionizing-radiation. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 2,886,836 bp long genome with its four large plasmids of lengths 97 kbp, 132 kbp, 196 kbp and 315 kbp harbors 2,741 protein-coding and 58 RNA genes and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.


strictly aerobicnon-motilechemoorganotrophicproteolyticradioresistantmesophilecarotenoid pigmentstetrad-forming cocciGram-positiveDeinococcaceaeGEBA


Strain MRPT, also known as Kobatake strain MRP (= DSM 20540 = ATCC 35074 = JCM 6276) is the type strain of Deinococcus proteolyticus [1], one of currently 47 validly named species in the genus Deinococcus [2]. The genus name is derived from the latinized Greek word deinos meaning 'strange or unusual' and the Neo-Latin word coccus meaning 'a grain or berry', yielding the Neo-Latin 'Deinococcus', meaning the 'unusual coccus' [1]. The species epithet is derived from the Neo-Latin word proteolyticus, meaning proteolytic [1]. Strain MRPT was isolated in the early 1970s from feces of Lama glama by Kobatake et al., and became known under its synonym “Micrococcus radioproteolyticus” [3], which according to Rule 12a of the Bacteriological Code was an illegitimate species epithet because it expressed more than one single concept [1]. The genus name “Micrococcus” was not considered for the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names published by Skerman et al. in 1980 [4]. In 1981 Brooks and Murray posited the family Deinococcaceae and the genus Deinococcus, with D. radiodurans as the type species of the type genus and D. proteolyticus as one out of three other members of the novel genus [1]. Many strains of the family Deinococcaceae are resistant to high levels of gamma and ultraviolet radiation [1]. Cells of deinococci are spherical or rod shaped [5]. Several distinct cell wall layers have been observed in thin sections and the cell wall contains lipoprotein [1]. The natural habitat of the members of genus Deinococcus was unknown for a long time, largely because of the recognition was not easy [6]. Plasmids of strain MRPT were previously analyzed by Mackay et al. [7], and survival of repeated lyophilisation was studied by Rýznar and Drásil [8]. The Genes hsp70 [9], hps40 [10], and SSB genes were sequenced [11], primarily for phylogenetic analyses. The members of the genus Deinococcus have been isolated from diverse environments [12-15], usually selected and characterized by survival after high-dose irradiation [6]. To date no further isolates of D. proteolyticus have been reported. Here, we present a summary classification and a set of features for D. proteolyticus MRPT, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of D. proteolyticus MRPT was compared using NCBI BLAST [16,17] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [18] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [19]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genus was Deinococcus (100.0%) (85 hits in total). Regarding the two hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.8%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 98.4%. Regarding the 52 hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 92.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 95.1%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was Deinococcus piscis (DQ683348), which corresponded to an identity of 98.0% and an HSP coverage of 98.5%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was JF171367 ('skin antecubital fossa clone ncd1964b12c1'), which showed an identity of 95.1% and an HSP coverage of 89.1%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'skin' (20.6%), 'fossa' (10.2%), 'forearm' (9.2%), 'volar' (8.8%) and 'antecubit' (6.7%) (165 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of D. proteolyticus in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ by three nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (Y11331).

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of D. proteolyticus relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Deinococcaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,377 aligned characters [20,21] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [22]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [23] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 750 ML bootstrap replicates [24] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [25] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [26] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [27-29]. The genome of D. radiodurans published by White et al. in 1999 [30] later turned out not to be from the type strain [31].

Table 1

Classification and general features of D. proteolyticus MRPT according to the MIGS recommendations [32] and the NamesforLife database [33].




     Evidence code

     Current classification

       Domain Bacteria

     TAS [34]

       Phylum "Deinococcus-Thermus"

     TAS [35,36]

       Class Deinococci

     TAS [37,38]

       Order Deinococcales

     TAS [5]

       Family Deinococcaceae

     TAS [1,5]

       Genus Deinococcus

     TAS [1,5]

       Species Deinococcus proteolyticus

     TAS [1]

       Type strain MRP

     TAS [1]

     Gram stain


     TAS [1]

     Cell shape

       spheres; singly, in pairs or tetrads

     TAS [1]



     TAS [1]



     TAS [1]

     Temperature range


     TAS [1]

     Optimum temperature


     TAS [1]


       1% NaCl

     TAS [1]


     Oxygen requirement

       strictly aerobic

     TAS [1]

     Carbon source


     TAS [1]

     Energy source


     TAS [1]



       soil, host

     TAS [3]


     Biotic relationship







     Biosafety level


     TAS [39]


       feces of Lama glama

     TAS [3]


     Geographic location

       not reported


     Sample collection time

       1973 or before

     TAS [3]



       not reported



       not reported



       not reported



       not reported

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [40]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Strain MRPT is strictly aerobic, Gram-positive and non-motile [1]. Cells are spheres (Figure 2), 1.0 to 2.0 µm in diameter, occurring singly and in pairs [1]. Cells are divided into two planes to form tetrads or tablets of cells, and the cell wall consists of at least three distinct layers [1]. Resting stages of cells are not known [1]. Colonies are orange-red, smooth and convex with a regular edge [1]. Multiple carotenoids are present in the cells [1]. The organism reveals the presence of polyphosphate granules which have a delicate granular structure [41]. Optimal growth temperature is 30ºC [1], but the organism is also able to grow at 37 ºC [42]. Growth was observed in media that contained 1% of NaCl [1], but not when the media contained 5% of NaCl [42]. Strain MRPT is chemoorganotrophic with respiratory metabolism [1]. The organism produces catalase, but not β-galactosidase [42], and does not reduce nitrate to nitrite [42]. The reaction was negative for methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, indole and citrate tests [42]. Strain MRPT does not produce acid from arabinose, galactose, lactose, maltose, manitol, sorbitol, sucrose or xylose [42]. Acid with no gas was produced from glucose or fructose, when the organism was grown on peptone-water basal medium or the basal medium according to subcommittee on taxonomy of staphylococci and micrococci [1,42,43]. Esculin was hydrolyzed by strain MRPT [42]. The organism was more active in digesting proteins (milk, soya and gelatin) than D. radiodurans [1]; milk is peptonized and gelatine is liquefied by strain MRPT [1]. Strain MRPT is resistant to to gamma radiation up to 1.5 Mrad. [1].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of D. proteolyticus MRPT


The cell wall of strain MRPT contains A3β type peptidoglycan [41], with L-ornithine in the peptide subunit and glycine in the interpeptide bridge [1]. The predominant fatty acid is palmitoleate, whereas branched-chain fatty acids are present in minor amounts only [1]: C16:1 (73.0%), C18:1 (7.8%), C17:1 (6.9%), C17:0 (4.8%), C16:0 (3.7%), C19:1 (2.4%), C15:1 (0.9%), and trace amounts of C14:0, C14:1 and C15:0 [42]. The fatty acid composition and the cell wall profiles of D. proteolyticus are similar to those of D. radiodurans and D. radiophilus [41,42].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [44], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [45]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome On Line Database [26] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information





      Finishing quality



      Libraries used

    Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,    one 454 PE library (8 kb insert size), one Illumina library


      Sequencing platforms

    454-GS-FLX-Titanium, Illumina GAii


      Sequencing coverage

    249.0 × Illumina; 33.0 × pyrosequence



    Newbler version 2.3, VELVET version 0.7.63, phrap version SPS - 4.24


      Gene calling method

    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP

      INSDC ID

    CP002536 (chromosome)    CP002537-40 (plasmids pDEIRP01-04)

      Genbank Date of Release

    October 7, 2011

      GOLD ID


      NCBI project ID


      Database: IMG-GEBA



      Source material identifier

    DSM 20540

      Project relevance

    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

D. proteolyticus MRPT, DSM 20540, was grown in DSMZ medium 53 (Corynebacterium Agar) [46] at 30°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [45]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [47].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [48]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 75 contigs in five scaffolds was converted into a phrap [49] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (721.9 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [50] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 146.0Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [49] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [48], Dupfinisher [51], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 169 additional reactions and two shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [52]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 282.0 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 149,969 pyrosequence and 20,053,100 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [53] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [54]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [55].

Genome properties

The genome consist of a 2,147,060 bp long chromosome and four large circular plasmids of 315,518 bp, 195,800 bp, 132,270 bp, and 97,188 bp length, and a G+C content of 65.6% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,799 genes predicted, 2,741 were protein-coding genes, and 58 RNAs; 85 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (65.0%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3

Genome Statistics



     % of Total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding region (bp)



DNA G+C content (bp)



Number of replicons


Extrachromosomal elements


Total genes



RNA genes



rRNA operons


tRNA genes



Protein-coding genes



Pseudo genes



Genes with function prediction



Genes in paralog clusters



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes assigned Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats


Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome (plasmids not shown, but accessible through the img/er pages on the JGI web pages [48]); From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content (black), GC skew (purple/olive).

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories








     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




     RNA processing and modification








     Replication, recombination and repair




     Chromatin structure and dynamics




     Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning




     Nuclear structure




     Defense mechanisms




     Signal transduction mechanisms




     Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis




     Cell motility








     Extracellular structures




     Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport




     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




     Energy production and conversion




     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




     Amino acid transport and metabolism




     Nucleotide transport and metabolism




     Coenzyme transport and metabolism




     Lipid transport and metabolism




     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




     General function prediction only




     Function unknown




     Not in COGs



We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Katja Steenblock (DSMZ) for growing D. proteolyticus cultures. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.


  1. Brooks BW and Murray RG. Nomenclature for "Micrococcus radiodurans" and other radiation-resistant cocci: Deinococcaceae fam. nov. and Deinococcus gen. nov., including five species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1981; 31:353-360View Article
  2. Euzeby JP. List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:590-592View ArticlePubMed
  3. Kobatake M, Tamabe S and Hasegawa S. Nouveau micrococcus radioresistant à pigment rouge, isolé de feces de Lama glama, et son utilisation comme indicateur microbiologique de la radiosterilisation C R. Soc Biol. 1973; 167:1506-1510
  4. Skerman VBD, McGowan V and Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980; 30:225-420View Article
  5. Rainey FA, Nobre MF, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E and da Costa MS. Phylogenetic diversity of the deinococci as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence comparison. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:510-514View ArticlePubMed
  6. Counsell TJ and Murray RGE. Polar lipid profiles of the genus Deinococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1986; 36:202-206View Article
  7. Mackay MW, al-Bakri GH and Moseley BE. The plasmids of Deinococcus spp. and the cloning and restriction mapping of the D. radiophilus plasmid pUE1. Arch Microbiol. 1985; 141:91-94View ArticlePubMed
  8. Rýznar L and Drásil V. Influence of repeated lyophylisation on the survival of Deinococcus proteolyticus, Micrococcus luteus and Escherichia coli. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1991; 36:71-74View ArticlePubMed
  9. Gupta RS, Bustard K, Falah M and Singh D. Sequencing of heat shock protein 70 (DnaK) homologs from Deinococcus proteolyticus and Thermomicrobium roseum and their integration in a protein-based phylogeny of prokaryotes. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179:345-357PubMed
  10. Bustard K and Gupta RS. The sequences of heat shock protein 40 (DnaJ) homologs provide evidence for a close evolutionary relationship between the Deinococcus-thermus group and cyanobacteria. J Mol Evol. 1997; 45:193-205View ArticlePubMed
  11. Filipkowski P and Kur J. Identification and properties of the Deinococcus grandis and Deinococcus proteolyticus single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB). Acta Biochim Pol. 2007; 54:79-87PubMed
  12. Christensen EA and Kristensen H. Radiation-resistance of micro-organisms from air in clean premises. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B]. 1981; 89:293-301
  13. Ito H. Isolation of Micrococcus radiodurans occuring in radurized sawdust culture media of mushroom. Agric Biol Chem. 1977; 41:35-41View Article
  14. Kristensen H and Christensen EA. Radiation-resistant micro-organisms isolated from textiles. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B]. 1981; 89:303-309
  15. Ito H, Watanabe H, Takehisa M and Izuka H. Isolation and identification of radiation-resistant cocci belonging to the genus Deinococcus from sewage sludges and animal feeds. Agric Biol Chem. 1983; 47:1239-1247View Article
  16. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW and Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215:403-410PubMed
  17. Korf I, Yandell M, Bedell J. BLAST. O'Reilly: Sebastopol, CA; 2003.
  18. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P and Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72:5069-5072View ArticlePubMed
  19. Porter MF. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: electronic library and information systems 1980; 14:130-137.
  20. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17:540-552View ArticlePubMed
  21. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464View ArticlePubMed
  22. Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57:758-771View ArticlePubMed
  23. Hess PN and De Moraes Russo CA. An empirical test of the midpoint rooting method. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2007; 92:669-674View Article
  24. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME and Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009; 5541:184-200View Article
  25. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 4.0 b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002.
  26. Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IM, Smirnova T, Nosrat B, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:D571-D579View ArticlePubMed
  27. Makarova KS, Omelchenko MV, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Zhai M, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Kim E and Land M. Deinococcus geothermalis: the pool of extreme radiation resistance genes shrinks. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2:e955View ArticlePubMed
  28. de Groot A, Dulermo R, Blanchard L, Guérin P, Fernandez B, Vacherie B, Dossat C, Jolivet E, Siguier P and Chandler M. Alliance of proteomics and genomics to unravel the specificities of Sahara bacterium Deinococcus deserti. PLoS Genet. 2009; 5:e1000434View ArticlePubMed
  29. Pukall R, Zeytun A, Lucas S, Lapidus A, Hammon N, Deshpande S, Nolan M, Cheng JF, Pitluck S and Liolios K. Complete genome sequence of Deinococcus maricopensis type strain (LB-34T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2011; 4:163-172View ArticlePubMed
  30. White O, Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Gwinn ML, Nelson WC and Richardson DL. Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science. 1999; 286:1571-1577View ArticlePubMed
  31. Corrections and Clarifications [Erratum: Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1.] Science. 2004; 303:766bView Article
  32. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547View ArticlePubMed
  33. Garrity G. NamesforLife. BrowserTool takes expertise out of the database and puts it right in the browser. Microbiol Today. 2010; 37:9
  34. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579View ArticlePubMed
  35. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Taxonomic outline of the Archaea and Bacteria In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 155-166.
  36. Weisburg WG, Giovannoni SJ and Woese CR. The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1989; 11:128-134View ArticlePubMed
  37. . Validation List no. 85. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:685-690View ArticlePubMed
  38. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Class I. Deinococci class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 395.
  39. BAuA. Classification of bacteria and archaea in risk groups. TRBA 466. p. 70. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Germany. 2010.
  40. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29View ArticlePubMed
  41. Sleytr UB, Silva MT, Kocur M and Lewis NF. The fine structure of Micrococcus radiophilus and Micrococcus radioproteolyticus. Arch Microbiol. 1976; 107:313-320View ArticlePubMed
  42. Brooks BW, Murray RGE, Johnson JL, Stackebrandt E, Woese CR and Fox GE. Red-pigmented micrococci: a basis for taxonomy. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980; 30:627-646View Article
  43. . Subcommittee on taxonomy of staphylococci and micrococci: Recommendations. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon. 1965; 15:109-110View Article
  44. Klenk HP and Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010; 33:175-182View ArticlePubMed
  45. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060View ArticlePubMed
  46. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  47. Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG and Wägele JW. The DNA Bank Network: the start from a German initiative. Biopreserv Biobank. 2011; 9:51-55View Article
  48. . Web Site
  49. Phrap and Phred for Windows. MacOS, Linux and Unix. Web Site
  50. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829View ArticlePubMed
  51. Han C, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. In: Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics & computational biology. Arabnia HR, Valafar H (eds), CSREA Press. June 26-29, 2006: 141-146.
  52. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. 2008; Marco Island, FL.
  53. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119View ArticlePubMed
  54. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457View ArticlePubMed
  55. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278View ArticlePubMed