Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Thermovibrio ammonificans HB-1T, a thermophilic, chemolithoautotrophic bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent

  • Donato Giovannelli, ,
  • , Jessica Ricci,
  • , Ileana Pérez-Rodríguez,
  • , Michael Hügler
  • , Charles O’Brien
  • , Ramaydalis Keddis,
  • , Ashley Grosche,
  • , Lynne Goodwin
  • , David Bruce
  • , Karen W. Davenport
  • , Chris Detter
  • , James Han
  • , Shunsheng Han
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Miriam L. Land
  • , Natalia Mikhailova
  • , Matt Nolan
  • , Sam Pitluck
  • , Roxanne Tapia
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • and Costantino Vetriani,

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2856770

Received: 26 September 2012

Published: 10 October 2012

Abstract

Thermovibrio ammonificans type strain HB-1T is a thermophilic (Topt: 75°C), strictly anaerobic, chemolithoautotrophic bacterium that was isolated from an active, high temperature deep-sea hydrothermal vent on the East Pacific Rise. This organism grows on mineral salts medium in the presence of CO2/H2, using NO3- or S0 as electron acceptors, which are reduced to ammonium or hydrogen sulfide, respectively. T. ammonificans is one of only three species within the genus Thermovibrio, a member of the family Desulfurobacteriaceae, and it forms a deep branch within the phylum Aquificae. Here we report the main features of the genome of T. ammonificans strain HB-1T (DSM 15698T).

Keywords:

AquificaeDesulfurobacteriaceaethermophilicanaerobicchemolithoautotrophichydrothermal vent

Introduction

The genus Thermovibrio consists of three validly published, named species: T. ammonificans strain HB-1T [1], T. ruber strain ED11/3LLK T [2] and T. guaymasensis strain SL19T [3]. All three Thermovibrio spp. are anaerobic, chemolithoautotrophic bacteria that grow on mineral salts in the presence of carbon dioxide and hydrogen, reducing nitrate or sulfur to ammonium or hydrogen sulfide, respectively. T. ammonificans was isolated from an active high-temperature deep-sea hydrothermal vent located on the East Pacific Rise at 9° North, while T. ruber was isolated from shallow water hydrothermal vent sediments in Papua New Guinea and T. guaymasensis from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney in the Guaymas Basin [1-3]. Anaerobic chemolithoautotrophic bacteria mediate the transfer of energy and carbon from a geothermal source to the higher trophic levels. These anaerobic primary producers, which depend on inorganic chemical species of geothermal origin (i.e., carbon dioxide, hydrogen and sulfur), are completely independent from photosynthetic processes and represent an important component of the deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystem. Furthermore, microorganisms such as T. ammonificans, which also couple autotrophic carbon dioxide fixation with nitrate respiration, are of particular interest, as they link the carbon and nitrogen cycle, the latter of which has been under-studied at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Here we present a summary of the features of T. ammonificans strain HB-1T and a description of its genome.

Classification and features

Thermovibrio ammonificans strain HB-1T (=DSM 15698T =JCM 12110T) is a member of the phylum Aquificae, a group of thermophilic, deeply branching bacteria thought to be among the oldest on Earth. The phylum Aquificae consists of a single order, the Aquificales, which is composed of three families, Aquificaceae, Hydrogenothermaceae and Desulfurobacteriaceae (Figure 1). The genus Thermovibrio belongs to the family Desulfurobacteriaceae, which also includes the genera Desulfurobacterium, Balnearium and the newly described Phorcysia [6-8]. While the genomes of several members of the families Aquificaceae and Hydrogenothermaceae have been sequenced, the only genome sequences publicly available for the Desulfurobacteriaceae are those of T. ammonificans and Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum [9].

Figure 1

Phylogenetic position of Thermovibrio ammonificans HB-1T relative to other type strains within the Aquificae. Sequences were aligned automatically using CLUSTAL X and the alignment was manually refined using SEAVIEW [4,5]. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed with Phylo_Win, using the Jukes-Cantor correction [4]. Bootstrap values based on 100 replications. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Table 1 summarizes the classification and general features of Thermovibrio ammonificans HB-1T. Cells of T. ammonificans are Gram-negative, motile rods of about 1.0 µm in length and 0.6 µm in width (Figure 2). Growth occurs between 60 and 80 °C (optimum at 75 °C), 0.5 and 4.5% (w/v) sodium chloride (optimum at 2%) and pH 5 and 7 (optimum at 5.5). Generation time under optimal conditions is 1.5 h. Growth occurs under chemolithoautotrophic conditions in the presence of hydrogen and carbon dioxide, with nitrate or sulfur as the electron acceptor and with concomitant formation of ammonium or hydrogen sulfide, respectively. Thiosulfate, sulfite and oxygen are not used as electron acceptors. Acetate, formate, lactate and yeast extract inhibits growth. No chemoorganoheterotrophic growth was observed on peptone, tryptone or Casamino acids. The genomic DNA G+C content is 52.1 mol% [1].

Table 1

Classification and general features of Thermovibrio ammonificans HB-1T

MIGS ID

      Property

      Term

      Evidence code

      Current classification

      Domain Bacteria

      TAS [10]

      Phylum ‘Aquificae

      TAS [11]

      Class Aquificae

      TAS [12,13]

      Order Aquificales

      TAS [12,14,15]

      Family Desulfurobacteriaceae

      TAS [15]

      Genus Thermovibrio

      TAS [2]

      Species Thermovibrio ammonificans

      TAS [1]

      Type strain HB-1T

      Gram stain

      Negative

      TAS [1]

      Cell shape

      Short rod

      TAS [1]

      Motility

      motile

      TAS [1]

      Sporulation

      non-sporulating

      TAS [1]

      Temperature range

      60-80

      TAS [1]

      Optimum temperature

      75

      TAS [1]

      Carbon source

      CO2

      TAS [1]

      Energy source

      H2

      TAS [1]

      Terminal electron acceptor

      NO3-, S0

      TAS [1]

MIGS-6

      Habitat

      Marine, deep-sea hydrothermal vent

      TAS [1]

MIGS-6.3

      Salinity

      20 g NaCl l-1 (range 5 – 45 g NaCl l-1)

      TAS [1]

MIGS-22

      Oxygen

      Anaerobe

      TAS [1]

MIGS-15

      Biotic relationship

      free-living

      TAS [1]

MIGS-14

      Pathogenicity

      Not pathogenic

      NAS

MIGS-4

      Geographic location

      East Pacific Rise

      TAS [1]

MIGS-5

      Sample collection time

      April 2000

      TAS [1]

MIGS-4.1

      Latitude –

      9° 50' N

      TAS [1]

MIGS-4.2

      Longitude

      104° 18' W

      TAS [1]

MIGS-4.3

      Depth

      2500 m

      TAS [1]

MIGS-4.4

      Altitude

      not applicable

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [16].

Figure 2

Electron micrograph of a platinum shadowed cell of Thermovibrio ammonificans strain HB-1 T showing multiple flagella. Bar, 1 μm.

Chemotaxonomy

None of the classical chemotaxonomic features (peptidoglycan structure, cell wall sugars, cellular fatty acid profile, respiratory quinones, or polar lipids) are known for Thermovibrio ammonificans strain HB-1T.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

T. ammonificans was selected for genome sequencing because of its phylogenetic position within the phylum Aquificae and because of its ecological function as a primary producer at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were carried out by the US DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). Table 2 shows a summary of the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [17].

Table 2

Project information

MIGS ID

       Property

      Term

MIGS-31

       Finishing quality

      Finished

MIGS-28

       Libraries used

      454 pyrosequence standard library, 454 Paired End, Illumina

MIGS-29

       Sequencing platforms

      454 GS FLX Titanium and Illumina GAii

MIGS-31.2

       Fold coverage

      4,325 ×

MIGS-30

       Assemblers

      Newbler 2.3, Velvet 0.7.63

MIGS-32

       Gene calling method

      Prodigal 1.4

       Genome Database release

      January 7, 2011

       Genbank ID

      NC_014926

       GOLD ID

      Gc01577

       Project relevance

      Chemosynthetic ecosystems, CO2 fixation, Thermophiles

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. ammonificans was grown in two liters of modified SME medium at 75 °C under a H2/CO2 gas phase (80:20; 200 kPa) with CO2 as the carbon source and nitrate as the electron acceptor [1]. Genomic DNA was isolated from 0.5 - 1 g of pelleted cells using a protocol that included a lysozyme/SDS lysis step, followed by two extractions with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (50:49:1) and ethanol precipitation. This procedure yielded about 25 μg of genomic DNA, which was submitted to the DOE JGI for sequencing.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of Thermovibrio ammonificans was sequenced at the DOE JGI [18] using a combination of Illumina [19] and 454 platforms [20]. The following libraries were used: 1) An Illumina GAii shotgun library, which generated 10,255,5615 reads totaling 7,794 Mb; 2) A 454 Titanium standard library, which generated 186,945 reads; and 3) A paired end 454 library with an average insert size of 11.895 +/- 2.973 kb, which generated 115,495 reads totaling 104.7 Mb of 454 data. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website [21]. The initial draft assembly contained 16 contigs in 2 scaffolds. The 454 Titanium standard data and the 454 paired end data were assembled together with Newbler, version 2.3. The Newbler consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 2 kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). Illumina sequencing data was assembled with VELVET, version 0.7.63 [22], and the consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 1.5 kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). The 454 Newbler consensus shreds, the Illumina VELVET consensus shreds and the read pairs in the 454 paired end library were integrated using parallel phrap, version SPS - 4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). The software Consed [23] was used in the finishing process. Illumina data were used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software Polisher developed at JGI (Alla Lapidus, unpublished). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected using gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher [24], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR (J-F Cheng, unpublished) primer walks. A total of 46 additional reactions and 1 shatter library were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The total size of the genome is 1,759,526 bp (chromosome and plasmid) and the final assembly is based on 67.7 Mb of 454 draft data, which provide an average 40× coverage of the genome, and 7,284 Mb of Illumina draft data, which provide an average 4,285× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [25] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [26]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [27], RNAMMer [28], Rfam [29], TMHMM [30], and signalP [31].

Genome properties

The genome includes one circular chromosome and one plasmid, for a total size of 1,759,526 bp (chromosome size: 1,682,965 bp; GC content: 52.13%). Of the 1,888 genes predicted from the genome, 1,831 are protein-coding genes. Of the protein coding genes, 1,279 were assigned to a putative function, with those remaining annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Figure 3 and Tables 3 and 4.

Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs cyan, rRNAs red, other RNAs blue), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute

    Value

    % of totala

Genome size (bp)

    1,759,526

DNA Coding region (bp)

    1,674,589

    95.17%

DNA G+C content (bp)

    917,237

    52.13%

Chromosome (bp)

    1,682,965

Plasmid (bp)

    76,561

Total genes

    1888

RNA genes

    57

    3.02%

Protein-coding genes

    1831

    96.98%

Genes in paralog clusters

    2

    0.11%

Genes assigned to COGs

    1419

    75.16%

Genes with signal peptides

    535

    28.34%

Genes with transmembrane helices

    369

    19.54%

Paralogous groups

    1

    100%

a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

   Value

   % agea

    Description

J

   154

   8.41

    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

   -

   -

    RNA processing and modification

K

   70

   3.82

    Transcription

L

   78

   4.25

    Replication, recombination and repair

B

   3

   0.16

    Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

   40

   2.18

    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

   -

   -

    Nuclear structure

V

   33

   1.80

    Defense mechanisms

T

   71

   3.87

    Signal transduction mechanisms

M

   135

   7.37

    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

   70

   3.82

    Cell motility

Z

   -

   -

    Cytoskeleton

W

   -

   -

    Extracellular structures

U

   67

   3.66

    Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

   92

   5.02

    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

   158

   8.63

    Energy production and conversion

G

   77

   4.20

    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

   155

   8.46

    Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

   72

   3.93

    Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

   120

   6.55

    Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

   46

   2.51

    Lipid transport and metabolism

P

   102

   5.57

    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

   38

   2.08

    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

   220

   12.02

    General function prediction only

S

   92

   5.03

    Function unknown

-

   412

   22.50

    Not in COGs

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The genome of Thermovibrio ammonificans was sequenced under the auspices of the US Department of Energy. Work on T. ammonificans was supported, entirely or in part, by NSF Grants MCB 04-56676, OCE 03-27353, MCB 08-43678, OCE 09-37371 and OCE 11-24141 to CV, and by the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Vetriani C, Speck MD, Ellor SV, Lutz R and Starovoytov V. Thermo vibrio ammonificans sp. nov., a thermophilic, themolithotrophic, nitrate-ammonifying bacterium from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54:175-181 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Huber H, Diller S, Horn C and Rachel R. Thermovibrio ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic, chemolithoautotrophic, nitrate-reducing bacterium that forms a deep branch within the phylum Aquificae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:1859-1865 View ArticlePubMed
  3. L'Haridon S, Reysenbach AL, Tindall BJ, Schonheit P, Banta A, Johnsen U, Schumann P, Gambacorta A, Stackebrandt E and Jeanthon C. Desulfurobacterium atlanticum sp. nov., Desulfurobacterium pacificum sp. nov. and Thermovibrio guaymasensis sp. nov., three thermophilic members of the Desulfurobacteriaceae fam. nov., a deep branching lineage within the Bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:2843-2852 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Galtier N, Gouy M and Gautier C. SEAVIEW and PHYLO\_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Computer applications in the biosciences. CABIOS. 1996; 12:543-548PubMed
  5. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F and Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. [PubMed]. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25:4876-4882 View ArticlePubMed
  6. L'Haridon S, Cilia V, Messner P, Raguenes G, Gambacorta A, Sleytr UB, Prieur D and Jeanthon C. Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel autotrophic, sulphur-reducing bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998; 48:701-711 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Takai K, Nakagawa S, Sako Y and Horikoshi K. Balnearium lithotrophicum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, strictly anaerobic, hydrogen-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph isolated from a black smoker chimney in the Suiyo Seamount hydrothermal system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003; 53:1947-1954 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Pérez-Rodríguez, I., A. Grosche, L. Massenburg, V. Starovoytov, R.A. Lutz and C. Vetriani. Phorcysia thermohydrogeniphila gen. nov. sp. nov., a thermophilic, chemolithoautotrophic, nitrate-ammonifying bacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent on the East Pacific Rise. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 2012; 62:2388-2394.
  9. Göker M, Daligault H, Mwirichia R, Lapidus A, Lucas S, Deshpande S, Pagani I, Tapia R, Cheng JF and Goodwin L. Complete genome sequence of the thermophilic sulfur-reducer Desulfurobacterium thermolithotrophum type strain (BSAT) from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Stand Genomic Sci. 2011; 5:407-415 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Reysenbach AL. Phylum BI. Aquificae In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 359-367.
  12. . Validation List no. 85. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:685-690 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Reysenbach AL. Class I. Aquificae class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 359.
  14. Reysenbach AL. Order I. Aquificales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 359.
  15. L'Haridon S, Reysenbach AL, Tindall BJ, Schönheit P, Banta A, Johnsen U, Schumann P, Gambacorta A, Stackebrandt E and Jeanthon C. Desulfurobacterium atlanticum sp. nov., Desulfurobacterium pacificum sp. nov. and Thermovibrio guaymasensis sp. nov., three thermophilic members of the Desulfurobacteriaceae fam. nov., a deep branching lineage within the Bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:2843-2852 View ArticlePubMed
  16. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  18. JGI website. Web Site
  19. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5:433-438 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ and Chen Z. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005; 437:326-327PubMed
  21. . Web Site
  22. Zerbino DR and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  23. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package. Web Site
  24. Han C, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions auto-matically with Dupfinisher. In: Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics & computational biology. Arabnia HR, Valafar H (eds), CSREA Press. June 26-29, 2006: 141-146.
  25. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Lari-mer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identifi-cation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  26. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. Gene-PRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Lowe TM and Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25:955-964PubMed
  28. Lagesen K, Hallin PF, Rødland E, Stærfeldt HH, Rognes T and Ussery DW. RNammer: consistent annotation of rRNA genes in genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35:3100-3108 View ArticlePubMed
  29. Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, Khanna A and Eddy SR. Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31:439-441 View ArticlePubMed
  30. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G and Sonnhammer ELL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001; 305:567-580 View ArticlePubMed
  31. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G and Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004; 340:783-795 View ArticlePubMed