Open Access

High quality draft genome sequence of the slightly halophilic bacterium Halomonas zhanjiangensis type strain JSM 078169T (DSM 21076T) from a sea urchin in southern China

  • Yu Zhou,
  • , Rui Li
  • , Xiao-Yang Gao,
  • , Alla Lapidus,
  • , James Han
  • , Matthew Haynes
  • , Elizabeth Lobos
  • , Marcel Huntemann
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Natalia N. Ivanova
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Brian J. Tindall
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides,
  • and Wen-Jun Li,
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5449586

Received: 11 April 2014

Accepted: 11 April 2014

Published: 15 June 2014


Halomonas zhanjiangensis Chen et al. 2009 is a member of the genus Halomonas, family Halomonadaceae, class Gammaproteobacteria. Representatives of the genus Halomonas are a group of halophilic bacteria often isolated from salty environments. The type strain H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T was isolated from a sea urchin (Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus) collected from the South China Sea. The genome of strain JSM 078169T is the fourteenth sequenced genome in the genus Halomonas and the fifteenth in the family Halomonadaceae. The other thirteen genomes from the genus Halomonas are H. halocynthiae, H. venusta, H. alkaliphila, H. lutea, H. anticariensis, H. jeotgali, H. titanicae, H. desiderata, H. smyrnensis, H. salifodinae, H. boliviensis, H. elongata and H stevensii. Here, we describe the features of strain JSM 078169T, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation from a culture of DSM 21076T. The 4,060,520 bp long draft genome consists of 17 scaffolds with the 3,659 protein-coding and 80 RNA genes and is a part of Genomic Encyclopedia of Type Strains, Phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes (KMG) project.


strictly aerobicmotile Gram-negativechemoorganotrophicslightly halophilicHalomonadaceae


Strain JSM 078169T (= DSM 21076 = KCTC 22279 = CCTCC AB 208031) is the type strain of the species Halomonas zhanjiangensis [1], one out of 84 species with a validly published name in the genus Halomonas [2], family Halomonadaceae [3]. The family Halomonadaceae currently comprises thirteen genera (Aidingimonas, Carnimonas, Chromohalobacter, Cobetia, Halomonas, Halotalea, Halovibrio, Kushneria, Marinospirillum, Modicisalibacter, Candidtus Portiera, Salinicola and Zymobacter) with Halomonas being the largest genus in this family [3-6]. Members of the genus Halomonas have been isolated from various saline environments and showed halophilic characteristics [7-11]. Strain JSM 078169T was originally isolated from a sea urchin (Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus) that was collected from the South China Sea. The genus name was derived from the Greek words ‘halos’ meaning ‘salt’ and ‘monas’ meaning ‘monad’, yielding the Neo-Latin word ‘halomonas’ [2]; the species epithet was derived from Latin word ‘zhanjiangensis’, of Zhanjiang, a city in China near where the sample was collected [1]. Strain JSM 078169T was found to assimilate several mono- and disaccharides and to produce numerous acid and alkaline phosphatases, leucine arylamidase, naphthol-ASBI-phosphohydrolase and valine arylamidase [1]. There are no PubMed records that document the use of these strain for any biotechnological studies; only comparative analyses performed for the description of later members of the genus Halomonas are recorded. However, the NamesforLife [12] database reports at least 70 patents in which Halomonas ssp. are referenced. Here we present a summary classification and a set of feature for H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T, together with the description of the genomic sequencing and annotation of DSM 21076.

Classification and features

16S rRNA analysis

The original assembly of the genome did not contain longer stretches of 16S rRNA copies. Therefore, a 1,413 bp long fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was later patched into the genome sequence assembly. This almost full length version of the 16S rRNA sequence was compared using NCBI BLAST [13,14] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent version of the Greengenes database [15] and the relative frequencies of taxa and unidentified clones (or strains) were calculated by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genus was Halomonas (74.8%), and the unidentified clones or isolates represented 25.5% for the total BLAST results. Except for sequences of representatives of the genus Halomonas, no sequences from other genera were observed in the BLAST search. The highest degree of sequence similarity was reported with H. alkantarctica str. CRSS.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T in a tree based on 16S rRNA genes. The 1,413 bp long sequence fragment of the 16S rRNA gene differs by three nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (FJ429198). The tree provided a precise insight into the nomenclature and classification of members of the genus Halomonas. The phylogenetic analysis showed that strain H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T was most closely related to H. nanhaiensis YIM M 13059T with 98.3% sequence similarity.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of H. zhanjiangensis relative to the closest related type strains of the other species within the family Halomonadaceae. All the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type strains within the genus Halomonas were included and combined with the representative 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type species in other genera, according to the most recent release of the EzTaxon database. The tree was inferred from 1,381 aligned characters [16] under the neighbor-joining (NJ) [17], and maximum-likelihood (ML) [18] method with 1,000 randomly selected bootstrap replicates using MEGA version 5.2 [19]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 NJ bootstrap (left) and from 1,000 ML bootstrap (right) replicates [20] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [21] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as ‘Complete and Published’ with two asterisks [22].

Morphology and physiology

H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T is a Gram-negative-staining, non-sporulating, strictly aerobic (Table 1), catalase-positive, oxidase-negative and slightly halophilic bacterium that reduces nitrate [1]. Cells of JSM 078169T are short rods (0.4-0.7 μm × 0.6-1.0 μm) and motile with peritrichous flagella (not visible in Figure 2). Colonies are yellow-pigmented, flat and non-translucent with glistening surfaces and circular/slightly irregular margins, 2-3 mm in diameter after incubation on Marine Agar (MA) at 28 ºC for 3-5 days. No diffusible pigments are produced. Growth occurs at 4-40 ºC with an optimum growth at 25-30 ºC, at pH range of 6.0-10.5 with an optimum pH of 7.5. The salinity range suitable for growth was 1.0-20.0% (w/v) total salts with an optimum between 3.0-5.0% (w/v) total salts. No growth occurs in the absence of NaCl or with NaCl as the sole salt. Strain JSM 078169T grows on Marine Agar and the medium contained the following: 5.0 g peptone, 1.0 g yeast extract, 0.1 g ferric citrate, 19.45 g NaCl, 8.8 g MgCl2, 3.24 g Na2SO4, 1.8 g CaCl2, 0.55 g KCl, 0.16 g NaHCO3, 0.08 g KBr, 0.034 g SrCl2, 0.022 g H3BO3, 0.004 g sodium silicate, 0.0024 g sodium fluoride, 0.0016 g ammonium nitrate, 0008 g disodium phosphate and 15 g agar.

Table 1

Classification and general features of H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T according the MIGS recommendations [23], (published by the Genomic Standards Consortium [24]), List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature [25] and the Names for Life database [12].




   Evidence code




   TAS [26]



   TAS [27]



   TAS [28-30]



   TAS [29,31]




   TAS [3,32-35]



   TAS [2,36]


    Halomonas zhanjiangensis

   TAS [1]

    Type strain

    JSM 078169

   TAS [1]


    Cell shape


   TAS [1]




   TAS [1]




   TAS [1]


    Temperature range


   TAS [1]

    Optimum temperature


   TAS [1]


    1-20% NaCl (w/v), optimum 3-5%

   TAS [1]



   TAS [1]


    Cell diameter

    0.7-1.4 μm

   TAS [1]


    Cell length

    1.5-2.5 μm

   TAS [1]


    Cell arrangement

    singles, pairs

   TAS [1]


    Energy metabolism


   TAS [1]



    aquatic, marine host

   TAS [1]


    Oxygen requirement


   TAS [1]


    Biotic relationship

    not reported

   TAS [1]


    Host name

    Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus (sea urchin)

   TAS [1]


    Isolation site

   TAS [1]


    Geographic location

    Naozhou island, South China Sea near Zhanjiang

   TAS [1]




   TAS [1]




   TAS [1]



    not reported



    not reported

Evidence codes-TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T


The predominant respiratory quinone is Q-9 which is consistent to the other members of the genus Halomonas [1]. The predominant fatty acids are C18:1 ω7c (48.9%), C16:0 (17.0%) and C12:0 3-OH (10.7%). The profile of major fatty acids is also similar to the other representatives of the genus Halomonas [38-41].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [42,43]. Sequencing strain JSM 078169T is part of Genomic Encyclopedia of Type Strains, Phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes (KMG) project [44], a follow-up of the GEBA project [45], which aims in increasing the sequencing coverage of key reference microbial genomes. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [21] and the permanent draft genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state of the art sequencing technology [46]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information





   Sequencing quality

    Level 2: High-Quality Draft


   Libraries used

    One Illumina standard shotgun library


   Sequencing method

    Illumina HiSeq 2000,


   Assembly method   Gene calling method   INSDC ID   Genbank date of release   GOLD ID

    Velvet v. 1.1.04; ALLPATHS v. r41043    Prodigal    ARIT00000000    December 12, 2013    Gi11554


   NCBI project ID



   Straininfo ID


   Database: IMG



   Source material identifier

    DSM 21076


   Project relevance

    Tree of Life, GEBA-KMG

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

H. zhanjiangensis JSM 078169T, DSM 21076, was grown in DSMZ medium 1510 (modified medium 514 for Halomonas sp.) [47] at 28 ºC. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1.0 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described by Wu et al. [45]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [48].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome sequence was generated using the Illumina technology [49]. An Illumina Standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform which generated 15,593,002 reads totaling 2,339.0 Mbp. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at [50]. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts [51]. Following steps were then performed for assembly: (1) filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet [52], (2) 1–3 kbp simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim [53], (3) Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG [54]. Parameters for assembly steps were: 1) Velvet (velveth: 63 –shortPaired and velvetg: –very clean yes –export-Filtered yes –min contig lgth 500 –scaffolding no –cov cutoff 10) 2) wgsim (–e 0 –1 100 –2 100 –r 0 –R 0 –X 0) 3) Allpaths–LG (PrepareAllpathsInputs: PHRED 64=1 PLOIDY=1 FRAG COVERAGE=125 JUMP COVERAGE=25 LONG JUMP COV=50, RunAllpathsLG: THREADS=8 RUN=std shredpairs TARGETS=standard VAPI WARN ONLY=True OVERWRITE=True). The final draft assembly contained 18 contigs in 17 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 4.1 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 501.3 Mbp of Illumina data, which provides an average 123.5 × coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [55] as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [56], following by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [57]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro database. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes-Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [58].

Genome properties

The assembly of the draft genome sequence consists of 17 scaffolds amounting to 4,060,520 bp, and the G+C content is 54.5% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,739 genes predicted, 3,659 were protein-coding genes, and 80 RNAs. The majority of the protein-coding genes (87.1%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4 and Figure 3.

Table 3

Genome statistics



    % of total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding region (bp)



DNA G+C content (bp)



Number of scaffolds


Extrachromosomal elements


Total genes



RNA genes



rRNA operons


tRNA genes



Protein-coding genes



Pseudo genes



Genes with function prediction (proteins)



Genes in paralog clusters



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes assigned Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats


Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories



    % age





    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




    RNA processing and modification








    Replication, recombination and repair




    Chromatin structure and dynamics




    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning




    Nuclear structure




    Defense mechanisms




    Signal transduction mechanisms




    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis




    Cell motility








    Extracellular structures




    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport




    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




    Energy production and conversion




    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




    Amino acid transport and metabolism




    Nucleotide transport and metabolism




    Coenzyme transport and metabolism




    Lipid transport and metabolism




    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




    General function prediction only




    Function unknown




    Not in COGs

Figure 3

The graphical map of the largest scaffold of the genome. From bottom to the top: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNA green, rRNA red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew (purple/olive).

Insights into the genome sequence

One complete genome sequence from a type strain of the family Halomonas - H. elongata [22] is available in GenBank, and four other permanent draft genomes of H. anticariensis, H. lutea, H. jeotgali and H. halocynthiae are available from IMG. The genome size of H. zhanjiangensis is smaller than those of H. elongata, H. lutea and H. anticariensis (4.06-5.02 Mbp), but much larger than those of H. jeotgali and H. halocynthiae (2.85-2.88 Mbp). Using the genome-to-genome distance calculator [59-61] version 2.0 revealed that all digital DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) values are much lower than 70% using the program NCBI-BLAST, which demonstrated that H. zhanjiangensis is distinct from H. elongata, H. anticariensis, H. lutea, H. jeotgali and H. halocynthiae at the species level. Distance is 0.1845 between the type strain genomes of H. zhanjiangensis and H. elongata, which corresponds to a DDH value of 13.00 ± 2.99%. The distances of H. zhanjiangensis from H. anticariensis, H. lutea, H. jeotgali and H. halocynthiae are 0.1842, 0.1837, 0.1835 and 01849, which correspond to DDH values of 20.30 ±2.41%, 20.30 ±2.41%, 20.40 ±2.41% and 20.20 ±2.41%, respectively.

A major feature of the previously sequenced genomes from this family is the presence of large numbers of proteins for the TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport systems. A total of 267 genes in the genome of H. zhanjiangensis encode proteins for carbohydrate transport and metabolism, 68 genes are related to TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport systems and encoded 22 large permease proteins, 24 periplasmic proteins and 22 small permease proteins. Genomic analysis of H. elongata, H. anticariensis, H. lutea, H. jeotgali and H. halocynthiae showed that they encode 58, 65, 61, 7 and 32 proteins related to TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport system respectively. Proteins for TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport systems constitute 1.86% as the total protein-coding sequences of the H. zhanjiangensis genome. In the genomes of H. elongata, H. anticariensis, H. lutea, H. jeotgali and H. halocynthiae, TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport system related proteins are accounted for 1.67%, 1.37%, 1.42%, 0.27% and 1.18% of the total protein-coding genes respectively. Therefore, H. zhanjiangensis has the highest percentage of TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport system related encoding proteins in this group of bacteria to date.

Of the signal transduction mechanisms, Methyl-accepting Chemotaxis Proteins (MCPs) are transmembrane sensor proteins of bacteria. The MCPs allow bacteria to detect concentrations of molecules in the extracellular matrix so that they may smoothly swim or tumble accordingly [62,63]. Various environmental conditions give rise to diversity in bacterial signaling receptors, and consequently there are many genes encoding MCPs [64]. A number of MCPs (23) are present in H. zhanjiangensis, while H. elongata, H. anticariensis, H. lutea, and H. jeotgali have only 4, 21, 16, and 17 MCPs, respectively. MCPs are not found in the genome of H. halocynthiae. H. zhanjiangensis has the largest numbers of MCPs in this family. The analysis of bacterial genomes reveals that the family Halomonadaceae differs enormously in the number of MCPs from E. coli, and the number of MCPs in Halomonadaceae is about two times than that of E. coli strains.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Susanne Schneider for growing H. zhanjiangensis cultures and Evelyne-Marie Brambilla for DNA extraction and quality control (both at the DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344 Genome analysis was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2010CB833801). W-J Li was also supported by ‘Hundred Talents Program’ of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. A.L. was supported in part by Russian Ministry of Science Mega-grant no.11.G34.31.0068 (PI. Dr Stephen J O'Brien)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


  1. Chen YG, Zhang YQ, Huang HY, Klenk HP, Tang SK, Huang K, Chen QH, Cui XL and Li WJ. Halomonas zhanjiangensis sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from a sea urchin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:2888-2893 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Vreeland R, Litchfield CD, Martin EL and Elliot E. Halomonas elongata, a new genus and species of extremely salt-tolerant bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1980; 30:485-495
  3. Franzmann PD, Wehmeyer U and Stackebrandt E. Halomonadaceae fam. nov., a new family of the class Proteobacteria to accommodate the genera Halomonas and Deleya. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1988; 11:16-19 View Article
  4. Anzai Y, Kim H, Park JY, Wakabayashi H and Oyaizu H. Phylogenetic affiliation of the pseudomonads based on 16S rRNA sequence. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000; 50:1563-1589 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Arahal DR, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH and Ventosa A. Phylogeny of the family Halomonadaceae based on 23S and 16S rDNA sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:241-249PubMed
  6. Mellado E, Moore ERB, Nieto JJ and Ventosa A. Phylogenetic inferences and taxonomic consequences of 16S ribosomal DNA sequence comparison of Chromohalobacter marismortui, Volcaniella eurihalina, and Deleya salina and reclassification of V. eurihalina as Halomonas eurihalina comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1995; 45:712-716PubMed
  7. Cabrera A, Aguilera M, Fuentes S, Incerti C, Russell NJ, Ramos-Cormenzana A and Monteoliva-Sánchez M. Halomonas indalinina sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a solar saltern in Cabo de Gata, Almería, southern Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:376-380 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Kim KK, Jin L, Yang HC and Lee ST. Halomonas gomseomensis sp. nov., Halomonas janggokensis sp. nov., Halomonas salaria sp. nov. and Halomonas denitrificans sp. nov., moderately halophilic bacteria isolated from saline water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:675-681 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Soto-Ramírez N, Sánchez-Porro C, Rosas S, González W, Quiñones M, Ventosa A and Montalvo-Rodríguez R. Halomonas avicenniae sp. nov., isolated from the salty leaves of the black mangrove Avicennia germinans in Puerto Rico. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:900-905 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Ventosa JJ. Nieto, Oren A. Biology of moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998; 62:504-544PubMed
  11. Wang YN, Cai H, Chi CQ, Lu AH, Lin XG, Jiang ZF and Wu XL. Halomonas shengliensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, denitrifying, crude-oil-utilizing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:1222-1226 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Garrity GM. Names for Life Browser Tool takes expertise out of the database and puts it right in the browser. Microbiol Today. 2010; 37:9
  13. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215403-410. PubMed http// Article
  14. Korf I, Yandell M, Bedell J. BLAST, O'Reilly, Sebastopol, 2003.
  15. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P and Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72:5069-5072 View ArticlePubMed
  16. Lee C, Grasso C and Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18:452-464 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Saitou N and Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4:406-425PubMed
  18. Strimmer K and von Haeseler A. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol. 1996; 13:964-969 View Article
  19. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M and Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28:2731-2739 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds OR, Moret BM, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? [ [pmid:20377449]. J Comput Biol 2010; 17:337-354. View Article
  21. Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IM, Smirnova T, Nosrat B, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:D571-D579 View ArticlePubMed
  22. Schwibbert K, Marin-Sanguino A, Bagyan I, Heidrich G, Lentzen G, Seitz H, Rampp M, Schuster SC, Klenk HP and Pfeiffer F. A blueprint of ectoine metabolism from the genome of the industrial producer Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. Environ Microbiol. 2011; 13:1973-1994 View ArticlePubMed
  23. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  24. Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt P, Garrity GM, Gilbert J, Glöckner FO, Hirschman L and Karsch-Mzrachi I. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9:e1001088 View ArticlePubMed
  25. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:590-592 View ArticlePubMed
  26. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Garrity GM, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Springer, New York, 2005.
  28. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class III. Gammaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT and Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
  29. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. List no. 106. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005; 55:2235-2238 View Article
  30. Williams KP and Kelly DP. Proposal for a new class within the phylum Proteobacteria, Acidithiobacillia classis nov., with the type order Acidithiobacillales, and emended description of the class Gammaproteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013; 63:2901-2906 View ArticlePubMed
  31. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order VIII. Oceanospirillales ord. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part B (The Gammaproteobacteria), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 270.
  32. Validation List no. 29. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989; 39:205-206 View Article
  33. Dobson SJ and Franzmann PD. Unification of the genera Deleya (Baumann et al. 1983), Halomonas (Vreeland et al. 1980), and Halovibrio (Fendrich 1988) and the species Paracoccus halodenitrificans (Robinson and Gibbons 1952) into a single genus, Halomonas, and placement of the genus Zymobacter in the family Halomonadaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996; 46:550-558 View Article
  34. Ntougias S, Zervakis GI and Fasseas C. Halotalea alkalilenta gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel osmotolerant and alkalitolerant bacterium from alkaline olive mill wastes, and emended description of the family Halomonadaceae Franzmann et al. 1989, emend. Dobson and Franzmann 1996. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:1975-1983 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Ben Ali Gam Z, Abdelkafi S, Casalot L, Tholozan JL, Oueslati R and Labat M. Modicisalibacter tunisiensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic, moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from an oilfield-water injection sample, and emended description of the family Halomonadaceae Franzmann et al. 1989 emend Dobson and Franzmann 1996 emend. Ntougias et al. 2007. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:2307-2313 View ArticlePubMed
  36. Dobson SJ and Franzmann PD. Unification of the genera Deleya (Baumann et al. 1983), Halomonas (Vreeland et al. 1980), and Halovibrio (Fendrich 1988) and the species Paracoccus halodenitrificans (Robinson and Gibbons 1952) into a single genus, Halomonas, and placement of the genus Zymobacter in the family Halomonadaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996; 46:550-558 View Article
  37. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  38. Berendes F, Gottschalk G, Heine-Dobbernack E, Moore ERB and Tindall BJ. Halomonas desiderata sp. nov, a new alkaliphilic, halotolerant and denitrifying bacterium isolated from a municipal sewage works. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1996; 19:158-167 View Article
  39. Romano I, Gottschalk G, Heine-Dobbernack E, Moore ERB and Tindall BJ. Characterization of a haloalkalophilic strictly aerobic bacterium, isolated from Pantelleria island. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1996; 19:326-333 View Article
  40. Heyrman J, Balcaen A, De Vos P and Swings J. Halomonas muralis sp. nov., isolated from microbial biofilms colonizing the walls and murals of the Saint-Catherine chapel (Castle Herberstein, Austria). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:2049-2054 View ArticlePubMed
  41. Jeon CO, Lim JM, Lee JR, Lee GS, Park DJ, Lee JC, Oh HW and Kim CJ. Halomonas kribbensis sp. nov., a novel moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a solar saltern in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:2194-2198 View ArticlePubMed
  42. Klenk HP and Göker M. En route to a genome - based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010; 33:175-182 View ArticlePubMed
  43. Göker M and Klenk HP. Phylogeny-driven target selection for genome-sequencing (and other) projects. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 8:360-374 View ArticlePubMed
  44. Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Eisen JA, Garrity G, Lilburn TG, Beck BJ, Whitman WB, Hugenholz P and Klenk HP. Genomic Encyclopedia of Type Strains, Phase I: the one thousand microbial genomes (KMG-I) project. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 9:628-634 View Article
  45. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M and Tindall BJ. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009; 462:1056-1060 View ArticlePubMed
  46. Mavromatis K, Land ML, Brettin TS, Quest DJ, Copeland A, Clum A, Goodwin L, Woyke T, Lapidus A and Klenk HP. The fast changing landscape of sequencing technologies and their impact on microbial genome assemblies and annotation. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e48837 View ArticlePubMed
  47. List of growth media used at DSMZ. Web Site
  48. Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG and Wägele JW. The DNA Bank Network: the start from a German initiative. Biopreserv Biobank. 2011; 9:51-55 View ArticlePubMed
  49. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5:433-438 View ArticlePubMed
  50. . Web Site
  51. Mingkun L, Copeland A, Han J. DUK, unpublished, 2011.
  52. Zerbino D and Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  53. Gnerre S and MacCallum I. High–quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:1513-1518 View ArticlePubMed
  54. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiati on site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  55. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The DOE-JGI Standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:63-67 View ArticlePubMed
  56. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD and Lykidis A. Kyrp ides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  57. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed
  58. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP and Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14:60 View ArticlePubMed
  59. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP and Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2:117-134 View ArticlePubMed
  60. Auch AF, Klenk HP and Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2:142-148 View ArticlePubMed
  61. Derr P, Boder E and Goulian M. Changing the specificity of a bacterial chemoreceptor. J Mol Biol. 2006; 355:923-932 View ArticlePubMed
  62. Alexander RP and Zhulin IB. Evolutionary genomics reveals conserved structural determinants of signaling and adaptation in microbial chemoreceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104:2885-2890 View ArticlePubMed
  63. Harrison DM, Skidmore J, Armitage JP and Maddock JR. Localization and environmental regulation of MCP-like proteins in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Mol Microbiol. 1999; 31:885-892 View ArticlePubMed