Open Access

Genome sequence of the acid-tolerant Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 from Karijini National Park, Australia

  • Robert Walker
  • , Elizabeth Watkin
  • , Rui Tian
  • , Lambert Bräu
  • , Graham O’Hara
  • , Lynne Goodwin
  • , James Han
  • , Tatiparthi Reddy
  • , Marcel Huntemann
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , Konstantinos Mavromatis
  • , Victor Markowitz
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Nikos Kyrpides
  • and Wayne Reeve
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5018795

Received: 15 November 2013

Accepted: 15 November 2013

Published: 15 June 2014

Abstract

Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming acid-tolerant rod that was trapped in 2001 from acidic soil collected from Karijini National Park (Australia) using Gastrolobium capitatum as a host. WSM2232 was effective in nitrogen fixation with G. capitatum but subsequently lost symbiotic competence during long-term storage. Here we describe the features of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232, together with genome sequence information and its annotation. The 7,208,311 bp standard-draft genome is arranged into 72 scaffolds of 72 contigs containing 6,322 protein-coding genes and 61 RNA-only encoding genes. The loss of symbiotic capability can now be attributed to the loss of nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes from the genome. This rhizobial genome is one of 100 sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

Keywords:

root-nodule bacterianitrogen fixationrhizobiaBetaproteobacteria

Introduction

Burkholderia spp. are a diverse group of organisms capable of thriving in diverse environments with many forming mutualistic associations with organisms such as fungi and plants [1]. The development in the 1960s and 1970s of a rational classification system for Pseudomonas species resulted in proposals to give different generic names to taxonomically distinct groups. The organisms previously classified within Pseudomonas rRNA similarity Group II were transferred into the new genus Burkholderia [2]. All described Burkholderia species at that time were phytopathogenic, or opportunistic mammalian pathogens with the type species B. cepacia becoming a growing community health concern in immunocompromised and cystic fibrosis patients [3-5]. With the isolation of more Burkholderia spp., it has become apparent that the genus is a far more complex mix, with the isolation of numerous soil-inhabiting species capable of degrading heavy metals and environmental contaminants [6,7]. Further reports identified plant growth promoting (PGP) species and legume microsymbionts. This led to a paradigm shift in rhizobiology and resulted in numerous new novel Burkholderia spp. descriptions [8-10].

Most PGP, or legume microsymbiont species of Burkholderia have been isolated in South America from Mimosa spp. or South Africa from Papilionoideae legumes and until recently, B. graminis was the only described PGP bacterial species isolated from Australia in the maize rhizosphere [11]. Australian Burkholderia have been isolated as nodule occupants from some Acacia spp., [12] however none have been authenticated or tested for the nodulation of other legumes. There is little data regarding the symbiosis between Burkholderia and legumes in Australia compared to South Africa and South America. Burkholderia sp. WSM2232 was trapped from acidic soil (pHCaCl2 4.8) collected from Karijini National Park (Western Australia) using Gastrolobium capitatum as a host. Sites where the soil pH was higher (pHCaCl2 >7) did not contain any Burkholderia symbionts but did contain numerous Bradyrhizobium and Rhizobium spp. (Watkin, unpublished). Soil pH is an edaphic variable that controls microbial biogeography [13] and the acid tolerance of Burkholderia has been shown to account for the biogeographical distribution of this genus [14].

The symbiotic capacity of WSM2232 was authenticated in axenic glasshouse trials using inoculation of G. capitatum grown in nitrogen free conditions. Inoculated plants nodulated by WSM2232 produced significantly greater mass than uninoculated controls. WSM2232 was subcultured and placed in long-term storage in frozen laboratory glycerol stocks. Isolate revival and inoculation onto endemic Australian legumes failed to elicit a symbiotic response. The reason for the loss of the symbiotic phenotype has, until now, not been identified.

The genome of Burkholderia strain WSM2232 is one of two Australian Burkholderia genomes (the other being that of WSM2230 (GOLD ID Gi08831)) that have now been sequenced through the Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) program. Here we present a preliminary description of the general features of Burkholderia sp. WSM2232 together with its genome sequence and annotation. The absence of nodulation genes within this genome explains the nodulation minus symbiotic phenotype of the laboratory cultured strain. The genomes of WSM2232 and WSM2230 will be an important resource to identify the processes enabling such isolates to adapt to the infertile, highly acidic soils that dominate the Australian landscape.

Classification and features

Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 is a motile, non-sporulating, non-encapsulated, Gram-negative rod in the order Burkholderiales of the class Betaproteobacteria. The rod-shaped form varies in size with dimensions of 0.25-0.5 μm for width and 0.5-2.0 μm for length (Figure 1A and 1B).

Figure 1

Images of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232using scanning (A) and transmission (B) electron microscopy.

It is fast growing, forming colonies within 1-2 days when grown on LB agar [15] devoid of NaCl and within 3-4 days when grown on half strength Lupin Agar (½LA) [16], tryptone-yeast extract agar (TY) [17] or a modified yeast-mannitol agar (YMA) [18] at 28°C. Colonies on ½LA are opaque, slightly domed and moderately mucoid with smooth margins.

Burkholderia sp. WSM2232 falls into a large clade containing PGP, bioremediation and legume microsymbiont species, and WSM2232 demonstrates PGP phenotypes including phosphate solubilization and hydroxamate-like siderophore production and is acid tolerant with growth in the pH range of 4.5-9.0 (Walker, unpublished).

Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence (MIGS) is provided in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 in a 16S rRNA sequence based tree. This strain shares 99% (1352/1364 bp) sequence identity to the 16S rRNA gene of the sequenced strain Burkholderia sp. WSM2230 (Gi08831).

Table 1

Classification and general features of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 according to the MIGS recommendations [19]

MIGS ID

Property

   Term

    Evidence code

Current classification

   Domain Bacteria

    TAS [20]

   Phylum Proteobacteria

    TAS [21]

   Class Betaproteobacteria

    TAS [22,23]

   Order Burkholderiales

    TAS [23,24]

   Family Burkholderiaceae

    TAS [23,25]

   Genus Burkholderia

    TAS [2,26,27]

   Species Burkholderia sp.

    IDA

   Strain WSM2232

    IDA

Gram stain

   Negative

    IDA

Cell shape

   Rod

    IDA

Motility

   Motile

    IDA

Sporulation

   Non-sporulating

    NAS

Temperature range

   Mesophile

    IDA

Optimum temperature

   30°C

    IDA

Salinity

   Non-halophile

    IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

   Aerobic

    IDA

Carbon source

   Varied

    IDA

Energy source

   Chemoorganotroph

    NAS

MIGS-6

Habitat

   Soil, root nodule, on host

    IDA

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

   Free living, symbiotic

    IDA

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

   Non-pathogenic

    IDA

Biosafety level

   1

    TAS

Isolation

   Root nodule of Gastrolobium capitatum

    IDA

MIGS-4

Geographic location

   Karijini National Park, Australia

    IDA

MIGS-5

Soil collection date

   September, 2001

    IDA

MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2

LatitudeLongitude

   117.99   -22.45

    IDA    IDA

MIGS-4.3

Depth

   0-10 cm

    IDA

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

   Not recorded

    IDA

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [28].

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 (shown in bold print) to other members of the order Burkholderiales based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,242 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA [29], version 5. The tree was built using the Maximum-Likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model [30]. Bootstrap analysis [31] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support for the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Brackets after the strain name contain a DNA database accession number and/or a GOLD ID (beginning with the prefix G) for a sequencing project registered in GOLD [32]. Published genomes are indicated with an asterisk.

Symbiotaxonomy

Burkholderia sp. WSM2232 formed nodules (Nod+) and fixed N2 (Fix+) with G. capitatum when first isolated and was Nod- on various other Australian legumes and Mimosa pudica (Table 2). However, after long-term storage and subsequent culture, it failed to effectively nodulate G. capitatum.

Table 2

Compatibility of Burkholderia sp. WSM2232 with nine legume species for nodulation (Nod) and N2-Fixation (Fix).

Species Name

  Common Name

   Growth Type

Nod

Fix

  Reference

Gastrolobium capitatum

  Bitter Pea

   Perennial

+1

+1

  IDA

-2

-2

  IDA

Kennedia coccinea

  Coral Vine

   Perennial

-

-

  IDA

Swainsona formosa

  Sturts Desert Pea

   Annual

-

-

  IDA

Indigofera trita

  -

   Annual

-

-

  IDA

Oxylobium robustum

  Shaggy Pea

   Perennial

-

-

  IDA

Acacia acuminata

  Jam Wattle

   Perennial

-

-

  IDA

Acacia paraneura

  Weeping Mulga

   Perennial

-

-

  IDA

Acacia stenophylla

  -

   Perennial

-

-

  IDA

Mimosa pudica

  Sensitive Plant

   Perennial

-

-

  IDA

1 result obtained from trapping experiment

2 authentication result following long-term storage

IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay from Web Site of the Gene Ontology project [28].

Phenotype Microarray

Strain WSM2232 was assayed using the Biolog Phenotype Microarray® plates (PM1 to 3) system testing 190 carbon and 95 nitrogen compounds. Plates were purchased from Biolog and tests were carried out per manufacturer’s instructions. The irreversible reduction of tetrazolium dye to formazan is used in this system to report on active metabolism [33]. The results obtained from the colorimetric assay are shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Reduction of tetrazolium dye by NADH produced by respiring cells of Burkholderia sp. WSM2232 in the Biolog Phenotype Microarray

PM1 plateCompound

  PM2 plate  Compound

   PM3 plate   Compound

L-Arabinose

+

  Chondroitin Sulfate C

-

   Ammonia

+

N-Acetyl-D Glucosamine

+

  α-Cyclodextrin

-

   Nitrite

+

D-Saccharic Acid

+

  β-Cyclodextrin

-

   Nitrate

+

Succinic Acid

+

  γ-Cyclodextrin

-

   Urea

+

D-Galactose

+

  Dextrin

+

   Biuret

-

L-Aspartic Acid

+

  Gelatin

-

   L-Alanine

+

L-Proline

+

  Glycogen

-

   L-Arginine

+

D-Alanine

+

  Inulin

-

   L-Asparagine

+

D-Trehalose

+

  Laminarin

-

   L-Aspartic Acid

+

D-Mannose

+

  Mannan

-

   L-Cysteine

+

Dulcitol

+

  Pectin

-

   L-Glutamic Acid

+

D-Serine

-

  N-Acetyl-D-Galactosamine

+

   L-Glutamine

+

D-Sorbitol

+

  N-Acetyl-Neuraminic Acid

-

   Glycine

+

Glycerol

+

  β-D-Allose

-

   L-Histidine

+

L-Fucose

+

  Amygdalin

-

   L-Isoleucine

+

D-Glucuronic Acid

+

  D-Arabinose

+

   L-Leucine

+

D-Gluconic Acid

+

  D-Arabitol

+

   L-Lysine

+

D,L-α-Glycerol-Phosphate

+

  L-Arabitol

+

   L-Methionine

+

D-Xylose

+

  Arbutin

-

   L-Phenylalanine

+

L-Lactic Acid

+

  2-Deoxy-D-Ribose

+

   L-Proline

+

Formic Acid

+

  I-Erythritol

-

   L-Serine

+

D-Mannitol

+

  D-Fucose

+

   L-Threonine

+

L-Glutamic Acid

+

  3-0-β-D-Galacto-pyranosyl-DArabinose

-

   L-Tryptophan

+

D-Glucose-6-Phosphate

+

  Gentiobiose

-

   L-Tyrosine

+

D-Galactonic Acid-γ-Lactone

+

  L-Glucose

-

   L-Valine

+

D,L-Malic Acid

+

  Lactitol

-

   D-Alanine

+

D-Ribose

+

  D-Melezitose

-

   D-Asparagine

+

Tween 20

+

  Maltitol

-

   D-Aspartic Acid

+

L-Rhamnose

+

  α-Methyl-D-Glucoside

-

   D-Glutamic Acid

+

D-Fructose

+

  β-Methyl-D-Galactoside

+

   D-Lysine

+

Acetic Acid

+

  3-Methyl Glucose

-

   D-Serine

+

α-D-Glucose

+

  β-Methyl-D-Glucuronic Acid

-

   D-Valine

+

Maltose

-

  α-Methyl-D-Mannoside

-

   L-Citrulline

+

D-Melibiose

-

  β-Methyl-D-Xyloside

-

   L-Homoserine

+

Thymidine

-

  Palatinose

-

   L-Ornithine

+

L-Asparagine

+

  D-Raffinose

-

   N-Acetyl-D,L-Glutamic Acid

+

D-Aspartic Acid

-

  Salicin

-

   N-Phthaloyl-L-Glutamic Acid

-

D-Glucosaminic Acid

+

  Sedoheptulosan

-

   L-Pyroglutamic Acid

+

1,2-Propanediol

-

  L-Sorbose

-

   Hydroxylamine

+

Tween 40

+

  Stachyose

-

   Methylamine

+

α-Keto-Glutaric Acid

+

  D-Tagatose

+

   N-Amylamine

+

α-Keto-Butyric Acid

+

  Turanose

+

   N-Butylamine

+

α-Methyl-D-Galactoside

-

  Xylitol

+

   Ethylamine

-

α-D-Lactose

-

  N-Acetyl-D-Glucosaminitol

+

   Ethanolamine

+

Lactulose

+

  γ-Amino Butyric Acid

+

   Ethylenediamine

-

Sucrose

-

  δ-Amino Valeric Acid

+

   Putrescine

+

Uridine

+

  Butyric Acid

+

   Agmatine

-

L-Glutamine

+

  Capric Acid

-

   Histamine

-

M-Tartaric Acid

+

  Caproic Acid

+

   β-Phenylethylamine

+

D-Glucose-1-Phosphate

+

  Citraconic Acid

+

   Tyramine

-

D-Fructose-6-Phosphate

+

  Citramalic Acid

+

   Acetamide

+

Tween 80

+

  D-Glucosamine

+

   Formamide

+

α-Hydroxy Glutaric Acid-γ-Lactone

-

  2-Hydroxy Benzoic Acid

-

   Glucuronamide

+

α-Hydroxy Butyric Acid

+

  4-Hydroxy Benzoic Acid

+

   D,L-Lactamide

+

β-Methyl-D-Glucoside

-

  β-Hydroxy Butyric Acid

+

   D-Glucosamine

+

Adonitol

+

  γ-Hydroxy Butyric Acid

+

   DGalactosamine

+

Maltotriose

-

  α-Keto Valeric Acid

-

   DMannosamine

+

2-Deoxy Adenosine

-

  Itaconic Acid

-

   N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine

+

Adenosine

+

  5-Keto-D-Gluconic Acid

-

   N-Acetyl-D-Galactosamine

-

Glycy-L-Aspartic Acid

+

  D-Lactic Acid Methyl Ester

+

   N-Acetyl-D-Mannosamine

-

Citric Acid

+

  Malonic Acid

+

   Adenine

+

M-Inositol

+

  Melibionic Acid

+

   Adenosine

+

D-Threonine

-

  Oxalic Acid

+

   Cytidine

+

Fumaric Acid

+

  Oxalomalic Acid

+

   Cytosine

+

Bromo Succinic Acid

+

  Quinic Acid

+

   Guanine

-

Propionic Acid

+

  D-Ribono-1,4-Lactone

-

   Guanosine

+

Mucic Acid

+

  Sebacic Acid

+

   Thymine

+

Glycolic Acid

-

  Sorbic Acid

+

   Thymidine

-

Glyoxylic Acid

+

  Succinamic Acid

+

   Uracil

+

D-Cellobiose

-

  D-Tartaric Acid

+

   Uridine

+

Inosine

+

  L-Tartari c Acid

+

   Inosine

+

Glycyl-L-Glutamic Acid

+

  Acetamide

-

   Xanthine

+

Tricarballylic Acid

+

  L-Alaninamide

+

   Xanthosine

+

L-Serine

+

  N-Acetyl-L-Glutamic Acid

+

   Uric Acid

+

L-Threonine

+

  L-Arginine

+

   Alloxan

+

L-Alanine

+

  Glycine

-

   Allantoin

+

L-Allnyl-Glycine

+

  L-Histidine

+

   Parabanic Acid

+

Acetoacetic Acid

+

  L-Homoserine

+

   D,L-α-Amino-N-Butyric Acid

+

N-Acetyl-β-D-Mannosamine

-

  Hydroxy-L-Proline

+

   γ-Amino-N-Butyric Acid

+

Mono Methyl Succinate

+

  L-Isoleucine

+

   ε-Amino-N-Caproic Acid

-

Methyl Pyruvate

+

  L-Leucine

+

   D,L-α-Amino-Caprylic Acid

-

D-Malic Acid

+

  L-Lysine

+

   δ-Amino-N-Valeric Acid

+

L-Malic Acid

+

  L-Methionine

-

   α-Amino-N-Valeric Acid

+

Glycyl-L-Proline

+

  L-Ornithine

+

   Ala-Asp

+

p-Hydroxy Phenyl Acetic Acid

+

  L-Phenylalanine

+

   Ala-Gln

+

m-Hydroxy Phenyl Acetic Acid

-

  L-Pyroglutamic Acid

+

   Ala-Glu

+

Tyramine

-

  L-Valine

+

   Ala-Gly

+

D-Psicose

-

  D,L-Carnitine

+

   Ala-His

+

L-Lyxose

+

  Sec-Butylamine

-

   Ala-Leu

+

Glucuronamide

-

  D,L-Octopamine

-

   Ala-Thr

+

Pyruvic Acid

+

  Putrescine

-

   Gly-Asn

+

L-Galactonic Acid-γ-Lactone

+

  Dihydroxy Acetone

-

   Gly-Gln

+

D-Galacturonic Acid

+

  2,3-Butanediol

+

   Gly-Glu

+

Phenylethylamine

+

  2,3-Butanone

+

   Gly-Met

+

2-Aminoethanol

+

  3-Hydrox y-2-Butanone

-

   Met-Ala

+

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its environmental and agricultural relevance to issues in global carbon cycling, alternative energy production, and biogeochemical importance, and is part of the Community Sequencing Program at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute (JGI) for projects of relevance to agency missions. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [32] and a standard-draft genome sequence in IMG. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the JGI. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Genome sequencing project information for Burkholderia sp. WSM2232.

MIGS ID

   Property

   Term

MIGS-31

   Finishing quality

   Standard draft

MIGS-28

   Libraries used

   One Illumina fragment library

MIGS-29

   Sequencing platforms

   Illumina HiSeq 2000

MIGS-31.2

   Sequencing coverage

   Illumina: 255×

MIGS-30

   Assemblers

   Velvet version 1.1.04; Allpaths-LG version r37348

MIGS-32

   Gene calling methods

   Prodigal 1.4

   GOLD ID

   Gi08832a

   NCBI project ID

   182741

   Database: IMG

   2508501125b

   Project relevance

   Symbiotic N2 fixation, agriculture

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 was cultured to mid logarithmic phase in 60 ml of TY rich medium on a gyratory shaker at 28°C [34]. DNA was isolated from the cells using a CTAB (Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method (Web Site).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using Illumina technology [35]. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform, which generated 12,244,888, reads totaling 1,837 Mbp.

All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at Web Site. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts (Mingkun, L., Copeland, A. and Han, J., unpublished). The following steps were then performed for assembly:

Filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet [36] (version 1.1.04)

1–3 Kbp simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim (Web Site)

Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG [37] (version r37348).

Parameters for assembly steps were:

Velvet --v --s 51 --e 71 --i 2 --t 1 --f "-shortPaired -fastq $FASTQ" --o "-ins_length 250 -min_contig_lgth 500")

wgsim (-e 0 -1 76 -2 76 -r 0 -R 0 -X 0)

Allpaths–LG (STD_1,project,assembly,fragment,1,200,35,,,inward,0,0 SIMREADS,project,assembly,jumping,1,,,3000,300,inward,0,0).

The final draft assembly contained 72 contigs in 72 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 7.2 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 1,837 Mbp of Illumina data, which provides an average 255× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [38] as part of the DOE-JGI annotation pipeline [39], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePrimp pipeline [40]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [41] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNA genes were found by searches against models of the ribosomal RNA genes built from SILVA [42]. Other non–coding RNAs such as the RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (Web Site). Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform (Web Site) [43].

Genome properties

The genome is 7,208,311 nucleotides 63.11% GC content (Table 5) and comprised of 72 scaffolds (Figure 3) of 72 contigs. From a total of 6,383 genes, 6,322 were protein encoding and 61 RNA only encoding genes. The majority of genes (80.90%) were assigned a putative function whilst the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 6.

Table 5

Genome Statistics for Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232

Attribute

   Value

   % of Total

Genome size (bp)

   7,208,311

   100.00

DNA coding region (bp)

   6,203,174

   86.06

DNA G+C content (bp)

   4,548,885

   63.11

Number of scaffolds

   72

Number of contigs

   72

Total gene

   6,383

   100.00

RNA genes

   61

   0.96

rRNA operons*

   1

   0.02

Protein-coding genes

   6,322

   99.04

Genes with function prediction

   5,164

   80.90

Genes assigned to COGs

   5,151

   80.70

Genes assigned Pfam domains

   5,425

   84.99

Genes with signal peptides

   645

   10.10

Genes with transmembrane helices

   1,497

   23.45

CRISPR repeats

   1

*4 copies of 5S, 2 copies of 16S and 1 copy of 23S rRNA.

Figure 3

Graphical map of the four largest scaffolds genome for the genome of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 6

Number of protein coding genes of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 associated with the general COG functional categories.

Code

Value

%age

  Description

J

474

8.15

  Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

A

3

0.05

  RNA processing and modification

K

151

2.60

  Replication, recombination and repair

L

559

9.61

  Transcription

B

1

0.0

  Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

42

0.72

  Cell cycle control, cell division and chromosome partioning

Y

0

0.0

  Nuclear structure

V

0

0.0

  Defense mechcanism

T

318

5.47

  Signal transduction mechanisms

M

371

6.38

  Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

N

125

2.15

  Cell motility

Z

0

0.00

  Cytoskeleton

W

2

0.03

  Extracellular structures

U

154

2.65

  Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport

O

183

3.15

  Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

384

6.60

  Energy production conversion

G

194

3.34

  Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

E

569

9.79

  Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

100

1.72

  Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

213

3.66

  Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

277

4.76

  Lipid transport and metabolism

P

269

4.63

  Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

199

3.42

  Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

673

11.58

  General function prediction only

S

500

8.60

  Function unknown

-

1,232

19.30

  Not in COGs

Acknowledgements

Declarations

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. Compant S, Nowak J, Coenye T, Clement C and Barka EA. Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008; 32:607-626 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H, Yano I, Hotta H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T and Arakawa M. Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol. 1992; 36:1251-1275PubMed
  3. Vial L, Chapalain A, Groleau MC and Deziel E. The various lifestyles of the Burkholderia cepacia complex species: a tribute to adaptation. Environ Microbiol. 2011; 13:1-12 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Govan JR, Hughes JE and Vandamme P. Burkholderia cepacia: medical, taxonomic and ecological issues. J Med Microbiol. 1996; 45:395-407 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Vandamme P, Holmes B, Vancanneyt M, Coenye T, Hoste B, Coopman R, Revets H, Lauwers S, Gillis M and Kersters K. Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47:1188-1200 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Chain PS, Denef VJ, Konstantinidis KT, Vergez LM, Agullo L, Reyes VL, Hauser L, Cordova M, Gomez L and Gonzalez M. Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 harbors a multi-replicon, 9.73-Mbp genome shaped for versatility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:15280-15287 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Achouak W, Christen R, Barakat M, Martel MH and Heulin T. Burkholderia caribensis sp. nov., an exopolysaccharide-producing bacterium isolated from vertisol microaggregates in Martinique. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49:787-794 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Angus AA and Hirsch AM. Insights into the history of the legume-betaproteobacterial symbiosis. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19:28-30 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Chen WM, de Faria SM, Straliotto R, Pitard RM, Simões-Araùjo JL, Chou J, Chou Y, Barrios E, Prescott AR and Elliott GN. Proof that Burkholderia strains form effective symbioses with legumes: a study of novel Mimosa-nodulating strains from South America. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71:7461-7471 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Suárez-Moreno ZR, Caballero-Mellado J, Coutinho BG, Mendonca-Previato L, James EK and Venturi V. Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia. Microb Ecol. 2012; 63:249-266 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Viallard V, Poirier I, Cournoyer B, Haurat J, Wiebkin S, Ophel-Keller K and Balandreau J. Burkholderia graminis sp. nov., a rhizospheric Burkholderia species, and reassessment of Pseudomonas phenazinium, Pseudomonas pyrrocinia and Pseudomonas glathei as Burkholderia. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998; 48:549-563 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Hoque MS, Broadhurst LM and Thrall PH. Genetic characterisation of root nodule bacteria associated with Acacia salicina and A. stenophylla (Mimosaceae) across south-eastern Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011; •••:299-309 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Fierer N and Jackson RB. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:626-631 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Stopnisek N, Bodenhausen N, Frey B, Fierer N, Eberl L and Weisskopf L. Genus-wide acid tolerance accounts for the biogeographical distribution of soil Burkholderia populations. Environ Microbiol. 2013 View ArticlePubMed
  15. Miller JH. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; 1972.
  16. Howieson JG, Ewing MA and D'antuono MF. Selection for acid tolerance in Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Soil. 1988; 105:179-188 View Article
  17. Beringer JE. R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1974; 84:188-198 View ArticlePubMed
  18. Terpolilli JJ. Why are the symbioses between some genotypes of Sinorhizobium and Medicago suboptimal for N2 fixation? Perth: Murdoch University; 2009. 223 p.
  19. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen M and Angiuoli SV. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes "Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence " (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  21. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
  22. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class II. Betaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 575.
  23. Validation List No. 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:1-6 View ArticlePubMed
  24. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order I. Burkholderiales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 575.
  25. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family I. Burkholderiaceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 575.
  26. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List No. 45. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993; 43:398-399 View Article
  27. Gillis M, Van TV, Bardin R, Goor M, Hebbar P, Willems A, Segers P, Kersters K, Heulin T and Fernandez MP. Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45:274-289 View Article
  28. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  29. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M and Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28:2731-2739 View ArticlePubMed
  30. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  31. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985; 39:783-791 View Article
  32. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D475-D479 View ArticlePubMed
  33. Barry RB, Peter G and Eugenia P. Phenotype microarrays for high-throughput phenotypic testing and assay of gene function. Genome Res. 2001; 11:1246-1255 View ArticlePubMed
  34. Reeve WG, Tiwari RP, Worsley PS, Dilworth MJ, Glenn AR and Howieson JG. Constructs for insertional mutagenesis, transcriptional signal localization and gene regulation studies in root nodule and other bacteria. Microbiology. 1999; 145:1307-1316 View ArticlePubMed
  35. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5:433-438 View ArticlePubMed
  36. Zerbino DR. Using the Velvet de novo assembler for short-read sequencing technologies. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 2010;Chapter 11:Unit 11 5.
  37. Gnerre S, MacCallum I, Przybylski D, Ribeiro FJ, Burton JN, Walker BJ, Sharpe T, Hall G, Shea TP and Sykes S. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:1513-1518 View ArticlePubMed
  38. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  39. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The DOE-JGI Standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:63-67 View ArticlePubMed
  40. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  41. Lowe TM and Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25:955-964PubMed
  42. Pruesse E, Quast C and Knittel K. Fuchs BdM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35:7188-7196 View ArticlePubMed
  43. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed