Open Access

Genome sequence and emended description of Leisingera nanhaiensis strain DSM 24252T isolated from marine sediment

  • Sven Breider
  • , Hazuki Teshima
  • , Jörn Petersen
  • , Olga Chertkov
  • , Hajnalka Dalingault
  • , Amy Chen
  • , Amrita Pati
  • , Natalia Ivanova
  • , Alla Lapidus
  • , Lynne A. Goodwin,
  • , Patrick Chain
  • , John C. Detter,
  • , Manfred Rohde
  • , Brian J. Tindall
  • , Nikos C. Kyrpides
  • , Tanja Woyke
  • , Meinhard Simon
  • , Markus Göker
  • , Hans-Peter Klenk
  • and Thorsten Brinkhoff
Corresponding author

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3828824

Received: 25 January 2014

Accepted: 25 January 2014

Published: 15 June 2014


Leisingera nanhaiensis DSM 24252T is a Gram-negative, motile, rod-shaped marine Alphaproteobacterium, isolated from sandy marine sediments. Here we present the non-contiguous genome sequence and annotation together with a summary of the organism's phenotypic features. The 4,948,550 bp long genome with its 4,832 protein-coding and 64 RNA genes consists of one chromosome and six extrachromosomal elements with lengths of 236 kb, 92 kb, 61 kb, 58 kb, 56 kb, and 35 kb, respectively. The analysis of the genome showed that DSM 24252T possesses all genes necessary for dissimilatory nitrite reduction, and the strain was shown to be facultatively anaerobic, a deviation from the original description that calls for an emendation of the species. Also present in the genome are genes coding for a putative prophage, for gene-transfer agents and for the utilization of methylated amines. Phylogenetic analysis and intergenomic distances indicate that L. nanhaiensis might not belong to the genus Leisingera.


Marinemotilefacultative anaerobemethylated compoundsRhodobacteraceaeRoseobacter clade


The genus Leisingera was proposed by Schaefer et al. in 2002 [1] and belongs to the family Rhodobacteraceae within the class Alphaproteobacteria. The genus currently consists of three species with validly published names, with Leisingera methylohalidivorans as the type species. The genus was named in honor of Thomas Leisinger on the occasion of his retirement and for his contributions to our understanding of the biochemistry of bacterial methyl-halide metabolism. NH52FT (= DSM 24252T = LMG 24841T = ATCC BAA-92T) is the type strain of L. nanhaiensis and was isolated from marine sandy sediment taken from the South Chinese Sea [2]. The species name is referring to Nanhai, the Chinese name for the South China Sea. The other two Leisingera species were isolated from seawater and a marine electroactive biofilm, respectively [1,3]. All three Leisingera species are able to grow on methylated amines as the sole N source [4] and, at least for L. methylohalidivorans, the ability to grow on methyl halides as sole carbon source was described [1].

Here we present a summary classification and features of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T, together with the description of the non-contiguous genomic sequence and annotation.

Classification and features

16S rDNA analysis

A representative genomic 16S rDNA sequence of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T was compared with the Greengenes database for determining the weighted relative frequencies of taxa and (truncated) keywords as previously described [5]. The most frequently occurring genera were Phaeobacter (51.0%), Roseobacter (20.2%), Silicibacter (7.6%), Leisingera (5.5%) and Nautella (3.9%) (75 hits in total). Regarding the four hits to sequences from other species of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 96.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 99.4%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was L. methylohalidivorans (NR_025637), which corresponded to an identity of 96.8% and an HSP coverage of 100.1%. [Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.] The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AJ296158 (Greengenes short name 'Spain:Galicia isolate str. PP-154'), which showed an identity of 96.3% and an HSP coverage of 100.0%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples that yielded hits were 'microbi' (7.7%), 'marin' (7.3%), 'water' (7.0%), 'coastal' (6.6%) and 'effect' (6.6%) (168 hits in total). Environmental samples that yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found, indicating that this species is rarely detected in the environment.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of L. nanhaiensis in a tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The sequences of the two identical 16S rDNA copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA gene sequence (FJ232451).

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of L. nanhaiensis relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus Leisingera and the neighboring genera Phaeobacter, Oceanicola, and Seohaeicola [1-3,6-16]. The tree was inferred from 1,385 aligned characters of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion as previously described [5]. Oceanicola spp. were included in the dataset for use as outgroup taxa. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates (right) if larger than 60% [5]. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [10,18-23].

Our phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1, Table 1) indicates that L. nanhaiensis is not particularly closely affiliated with the other Leisingera species. BLAST results against the NCBI database with the 1,429 bp long 16S rRNA gene sequence showed 97% similarity to L. methylohalidivorans strain MB2, Phaeobacter gallaeciensis DSM 17395 and P. gallaeciensis 2.10 (see also the Greengenes analysis described above). Thus a reclassification of L. nanhaiensis might be appropriate, but should probably be postponed until more genome sequences from the relevant genera are available, as the 16S rRNA gene trees are only partially resolved (Figure 1). A preliminary phylogenomic analysis is given below.

Table 1

Classification and general features of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T according to the MIGS recommendations [24] published by the Genome Standards Consortium [25].




     Evidence code

      Domain Bacteria

     TAS [26]

      Phylum Proteobacteria

     TAS [27,28]

      Class Alphaproteobacteria

     TAS [28,29]

      Current classification

      Order Rhodobacterales

     TAS [28,30]

      Family Rhodobacteraceae

     TAS [28,31]

      Genus Leisingera

     TAS [1,3,32]

      Species Leisingera nanhaiensis

     TAS [2]


      Subspecific genetic lineage (strain)


     TAS [2]


      Reference for biomaterial

      Sun et al 2010.

     TAS [2]

      Gram stain


     TAS [2]

      Cell shape


     TAS [2]



     TAS [2]


      Not reported


      Temperature range

      4-37 °C

     TAS [2]


      Optimum temperature


     TAS [2]




     TAS [2]


      Relationship to oxygen

      facultatively anaerobe


      Carbon source

      complex substrates, betaine, methionine

     TAS [2]

      Energy metabolism

      Not reported



      sea water, sediment, sand

     TAS [2]



      pH 6.0–9.3 (optimal, pH 7-8.5)

     TAS [2]


      Biotic relationship

      free living

     TAS [2]


      Known pathogenicity

      Not reported


      Specific host

      Not reported


      Health status of host

      Not reported

      Biosafety level


     TAS [33]


      Trophic level

      Not reported



      sandy sediments

     TAS [2]


      Geographic location

      South China Sea

     TAS [2]


      Time of sample collection

      before 2009





     TAS [2]




     TAS [2]



      157 m




      Not reported

Evidence codes – TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence); IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay. Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34].

Morphology and physiology

L. nanhaiensis NH52FT was originally described as an aerobe [2], but as genes for the dissimilatory reduction of nitrite could be found in the genome of DSM 24252T (see “Insights into the genome”) the organisms has the genetic potential to be a facultative anaerobe. Cells of strain NH52FT are Gram-negative, motile rods, 0.62 – 0.8 x 1.6 – 2.96 µm in size [2]. Figure 2 shows a scanning-electron micrograph of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T. NaCl is essential for growth, which occurs from 0.6% to 6.0% NaCl with an optimum between 1% and 4% [2]. The temperature range is 4°C – 37°C (optimum 25°C) and the pH range is 6 – 9.3 (optimum 7 – 8.5). Growth only occurs on complex substrates such as yeast extract, tryptone and peptone from potatoes, as well as betaine and methionine [2]. The color of the colonies grown on complex medium (M2 agar medium) is beige. The type strain is susceptible to a broad spectrum of antibiotics listed in [2].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T


The main cellular fatty acids of strain NH52FT are (>1% of total fatty acids) C18:1 ω7c, an unknown fatty acid (eqivalent chain-length of 11.799), C16:0 2-OH, C10:0 3-OH, C16:0, 11-methyl C18:1ω7c and C12:0 3-OH. The major polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified phospholipid, an unidentified lipid and an aminolipid [2].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of the DOE Joint Genome Institute Community Sequencing Program 2010, CSP 441: “Whole genome type strain sequences of the genera Phaeobacter and Leisingera – a monophyletic group of physiologically highly diverse organisms”. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [17] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state-of-the-art sequencing technology [35]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Genome sequencing project information





      Finishing quality

      Non-contiguous finished


      Libraries used

      Two Illumina paired-end libraries (270 bp and 8 kb insert size)


      Sequencing platforms

      Illumina GAii


      Sequencing coverage

      711 × Illumina



      Allpaths version r39750, Velvet 1.1.05, phrap version SPS - 4.24


      Gene calling method

      Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP

      INSDC ID


      GenBank Date of Release

      August 23, 2013

      GOLD ID


      NCBI project ID


      Database: IMG



      Source material identifier

      DSM 24252

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A culture of DSM 24252T was grown in DSMZ medium 514 (Bacto Marine Broth) [36] at 28°C. gDNA was purified using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the directions provided by the supplier but modified by the use of a 40 min incubation time. The purity, quality and size of the bulk gDNA preparation were assessed by JGI according to DOE-JGI guidelines. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [37].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome sequence was generated using Illumina data [38]. For this genome, we constructed and sequenced an Illumina short-insert paired-end library with an average insert size of 270 bp which generated 13,912,778 reads and an Illumina long-insert paired-end library with an average insert size of 7,381 ± 2,326 bp which generated 9,786,858 reads totaling 3,555 Mbp of data (Feng Chen, unpublished data). All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI web site [39]. The initial draft assembly contained 43 contigs in 14 scaffolds. The initial draft data was assembled with Allpaths and the consensus was computationally shredded into 10 kbp overlapping fake reads (shreds). The Illumina draft data was also assembled with Velvet [40], and the consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 1.5 kbp overlapping fake reads (shreds). The Illumina draft data was assembled again with Velvet using the shreds from the first Velvet assembly to guide the next assembly. The consensus from the second Velvet assembly was shredded into 1.5 kbp overlapping fake reads. The fake reads from the Allpaths [41] assembly and both Velvet assemblies and a subset of the Illumina CLIP paired-end reads were assembled using parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with manual editing in Consed [42-44]. Gap closure was accomplished using repeat resolution software (Wei Gu, unpublished data), and sequencing of bridging PCR fragments with Sanger technology. One round of manual/wet lab finishing was completed. A total of 43 additional sequencing reactions were completed to close gaps and to raise the quality of the final sequence. The estimated size of the genome is 5 Mb and the final assembly is based on 3,555 Mbp of Illumina draft data, which provides an average 711 × coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [45] as part of the JGI genome annotation pipeline [46], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [47]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene-prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [48].

Genome properties

The genome consists of seven scaffolds with a total length of 4,948,550 bp and a G+C content of 60.7% (Figures 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f and Figure 3g, Table 3). The scaffolds correspond to a chromosome 4,411,177 bp in length and six extrachromosomal elements. Of the 4,896 genes predicted, 4,832 were protein-coding genes and 64 RNAs. The majority of the protein-coding genes (81.1%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Figure 3a

Graphical map of the chromosome (cNanh_4411). From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3b

Graphical map of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_A236. From bottom to top: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3c

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_B92. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3d

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_D58. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3e

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_F35. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3f

Graphical map of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_E56. From left to right: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3g

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_C61. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3

Genome Statistics



       % of Total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding region (bp)



DNA G+C content (bp)



Number of replicons


Extrachromosomal elements


Total genes



RNA genes



rRNA operons


tRNA genes



Protein-coding genes



Pseudo genes



Genes with function prediction



Genes in paralog clusters



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes assigned Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories








       Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




       RNA processing and modification








       Replication, recombination and repair




       Chromatin structure and dynamics




       Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning




       Nuclear structure




       Defense mechanisms




       Signal transduction mechanisms




       Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis




       Cell motility








       Extracellular structures




       Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport




       Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




       Energy production and conversion




       Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




       Amino acid transport and metabolism




       Nucleotide transport and metabolism




       Coenzyme transport and metabolism




       Lipid transport and metabolism




       Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




       Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




       General function prediction only




       Function unknown



       Not in COGs





Insights into the genome

The replication-initiation systems identified on the scaffolds were as follows: cNanh_4411, dnaA, repB-I and rep ABC-2; pNanh_A236, repABC-5; pNanh_B92, dnaA-like and repA-d; pNanh_D58, repABC-9; pNanh_F35, repA-a; pNanha_E56, repA-b and repA-c; pNanh_C61, repA-I. This justifies the interpretation of cNanh_4411 as circular chromosome and of the other scaffolds as circular extrachromosomal elements [49,50].

Genome analysis of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T also revealed the genes for the utilization of methylated amines (MAs). The key genes from the proposed pathway of MA metabolism code for the enzymes trimethylamine monooxygenase (tmm) and gammaglutamylmethylamide synthetase (gmaS). The trimethylamine monooxygenase is a flavin-dependent enzyme, recently identified by Chen et al. [51]. Comparison of a previously published sequence for a trimethylamine monooxygenase gene in L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T from Chen [4] (GenBank accession number JN797867) showed 99% sequence similarity to the gene of a predicted flavoprotein involved in K+ transport in the genome of DSM 24252T (Nanh_04177). Comparison of the gmaS sequence (JN797857) with the genome showed also a 99% sequence similarity to a glutamine synthetase, type III (IMG term: gamma-glutamylmethylamide synthetase, EC (Nanh_04141). These genes give L. nanhaiensis the potential to utilize MAs as alternative nitrogen sources [4].

Interestingly, the genes tmm and gmaS of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T do not cluster with the corresponding genes of the other Leisingera species in phylogenetic trees calculated for these genes. The Tmm sequence (~255 amino acids) clusters with Ruegeria pomeroyi and Roseobacter denitrificans, the sequence for GmaS (~264 amino acids) with Ruegeria atlantica and Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b [4].

Strain DSM 24252T encodes a gene transfer agent (GTA), a virus-like particle that mediates transfer of genomic DNA between prokaryotes without negative effects on the host cell [52]. The GTA cluster has a length of ~17 kb (Nanh_00247-Nanh_00229) and shows structural similarities to GTAs of other Rhodobacterales species, e.g. Phaeobacter inhibens 2.10 and P. inhibens DSM 17395 [53]. (Note that the species affiliation of P. gallaeciensis and P. inhibens strains had recently been reassessed, resulting in the assignment of the alleged P. gallaeciensis type-strain deposit DSM 17395 to P. inhibens [54].) Strain DSM 24252T also harbors a putative prophage (Nanh_4518 - Nanh_4531).

We found all genes necessary for dissimilatory nitrite reduction, including the cluster for nitrite reductase (Nanh_03376 – Nanh_03386), the cluster for nitric oxide reductase (Nanh_03387 - Nanh_03394), and the cluster for nitrous oxide reductase (Nanh_01753 - Nanh_01761). L. nanhaiensis was described as an aerobic bacterium, but only the reduction of nitrate was tested in the original description of this organism [2]. Based on the genomic information we tested strain DSM 24252T for dissimilatory reduction of nitrite, by using anaerobic marine basal medium according to Cypionka and Pfennig [55] supplemented with nitrite (5mM) and methionine (1mM). Reduction of nitrite was tested photometrically at 545nm after two weeks, using the Griess reaction [56].

The results showed that strain DSM 24252T is able to reduce nitrite under anoxic conditions, demonstrating that it is a facultatively anaerobic organism. Below we propose an according emendation of the species description.

Interestingly, the same was found recently for Phaeobacter inhibens T5T [21], which also was initially only tested for the reduction of nitrate and thus described as a strictly aerobic bacterium [32]. A test for nitrite reduction showed, however, that P. inhibens is in fact a facultatively anaerobic bacterium [21]. Based on these findings, we suggest that anaerobic growth of roseobacters should not only be tested with nitrate, but also with nitrite.

As indicated by the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Figure 1), the classification of L. nanhaiensis might need to be reconsidered. We conducted a preliminary phylogenomic analysis using GGDC [57-59] and the draft genomes of the type strains of the other Leisingera and Phaeobacter species. The results shown in Table 5 indicate that the DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) similarities calculated in silico of L. nanhaiensis to Phaeobacter species are, on average, not smaller than those to other Leisingera species. The highest value was obtained for P. arcticus.

Table 5

DDH similarities between L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T and the other Leisingera and Phaeobacter species (with genome-sequenced type strains)

Reference species

      formula 1

      formula 2

      formula 3

L. aquamarina (AXBE00000000)




L. methylohalidivorans (CP006773, CP006774, CP006775)




P. arcticus (AXBF00000000)




P. caeruleus (AXBI00000000)




P. daeponensis (AXBD00000000)




P. gallaeciensis (AOQA01000000)




P. inhibens (AXBB00000000)




Calculated in silico with the GGDC server version 2.0 [59]. The standard deviations indicate the inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size); see [59] for details. The distance formulas are explained in [57]. The numbers in parentheses are GenBank accession numbers identifying the underlying genome sequences. The accession number of L. nanhaiensis is AXBG00000000.


Genome sequencing of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T reveals the presence of six plasmids with sizes between 35 kb and 236 kb (Table 6). The circular conformation of the chromosome and four extrachromosomal elements has been experimentally validated. The four larger plasmids contain characteristic replication modules of the RepABC-, DnaA-like and RepA-type comprising a replicase as well as the parAB partitioning operon [60]. The respective replicases that mediate the initiation of replication are designated according to the established plasmid classification scheme [61]. The different numbering of, e.g., the replicases RepC-5 and RepC-9 from RepABC-type plasmids corresponds to specific plasmid compatibility groups that are required for a stable coexistence of the replicons within the same cell [62]. The two small replicons pNanh_E56 and pNanh_F35 contain solitary RepA-IV type replicases without a partitioning module. This distribution may correspond with a higher plasmid copy number within the cell, thus assuring the replicon maintenance in the daughter cells after cell division. The additional RepA-IV type replicase that is located on the DnaA-like I plasmid pNanh_B92 may originate from a fusion event of two formerly independent plasmids.

Table 6

General genomic features of the chromosome and extrachromosomal replicons from L. nanhaiensis strain DSM 24252T.*




      Length (bp)

      GC (%)


      No. Genes#

















     DnaA-like I     RepA-IVc

































*circularity not experimentally validated; #deduced from automatic annotation.

The locus tags of all replicases, plasmid stability modules and the large virB4 and virD4 genes of type IV secretion systems are presented in Table 7. The largest plasmid pNanh_A236 contains a post-segregational killing system (PSK), consisting of a typical operon with two small genes encoding a stable toxin and an unstable antitoxin [63]. Moreover, this RepABC-type plasmid also contains a complete type IV secretion system including the virB operon for the formation of a transmembrane channel. The relaxase VirD2, which is required for the strand-specific DNA nicking at the origin of transfer (oriT), and the coupling protein VirD4 support the presence of a functional conjugation system on this plasmid [64,65]. The presence of the highly conserved chromosomal genes virD2 (Nanh_3787) and virD4 (Nanh_3786), representing the relaxase and coupling protein, respectively, is noteworthy. However, the presence of two genes with an equivalent function on pNanh_F35 (Nanh_0082, Nanh_0080) is indicative for the mobilization of the smallest plasmid. The RepA-I type replicon pNanh_C61 contains a complete rhamnose operon [66] and it is dominated by genes that are required for polysaccharide biosynthesis. Finally, the presence of CRISPRs (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) that provide acquired resistance against viruses [67] on the 56 kb replicon pNanh_E56 is noticeable. The circularity of this scaffold has not been validated experimentally, but the proven circularity of the chromosome supports the localization of these CRISPRs on a plasmid.

Table 7

Integrated Microbial Genome (IMG) locus tags of L. nanhaiensis DSM 24252T genes


Replication initiation

Plasmid stability

Type IV Secretion


      Locus tag




















     DnaA-like I     RepA-IVc*

      Nanh_0132      Nanh_0112

































Genes for the initiation of replication, toxin/antitoxin modules and two representatives of type IV secretion systems (T4SS) that are required for conjugation.

*solitary replicase without partitioning module

#presence of adjacent DNA relaxase VirD2

Emended description of Leisingera nanhaiensis DSM 24252T Sun et al. 2010

Leisingera nanhaiensis (nan.hai.en´sis. N.L. fem. adj. nanhaiensis referring to Nanhai, the Chinese name for the South China Sea, from where the type strain was isolated).

The description is the same as given by Sun et al. [2] with the following modification: The relationship to oxygen of Leisingera nanhaiensis DSM 24252T is changed from aerobic to facultatively anaerobic.



The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Helga Pomrenke for growing L. nanhaiensis cultures and Evelyne-Marie Brambilla for DNA extraction and quality control (both at the DSMZ). The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute was supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231; the work conducted by the members of the Roseobacter consortium was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) Transregio-SFB 51.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


  1. Schaefer JK, Goodwin KD, McDonald IR, Murrell JC and Oremland RS. Leisingera methylohalidivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine methylotroph that grows on methyl bromide. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002; 52:851-859 View ArticlePubMed
  2. Sun F, Wang B, Liu X, Lai Q, Du Y, Li G, Luo J and Shao Z. Leisingera nanhaiensis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010; 60:275-280 View ArticlePubMed
  3. Vandecandelaere I, Segaert E, Mollica A, Faimali M and Vandamme P.. Leisingera aquimarina sp. nov., isolated from a marine electroactive biofilm, and emended descriptions of Leisingera methylohalidivorans Schaefer et al 2002, Phaeobacter daeponensis Yoon et al 2007 and Phaeobacter inhibens Martens et al 2006. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008; 58:2788-2793 View ArticlePubMed
  4. Chen Y. Comparative genomics of methylated amine utilization by marine Roseobacter clade bacteria and development of functional gene markers (tmm, gmaS). Environ Microbiol. 2012; 14:2308-2322 View ArticlePubMed
  5. Göker M, Cleland D, Saunders E, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Lucas S, Hammon N, Deshpande S, Cheng JF and Tapia R. Complete genome sequence of Isosphaera pallida type strain (IS1BT). Stand Genomic Sci. 2011; 4:63-71 View ArticlePubMed
  6. Brinkhoff T, Bach G, Heidorn T, Liang LF, Schlingloff A and Simon M. Antibiotic production by a Roseobacter clade-affiliated species from the German Wadden Sea and its antagonistic effects on indigenous isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70:2560-2565 View ArticlePubMed
  7. Gu J, Guo B, Wang YN, Yu SL, Inamori R, Qu R, Ye YG and Wu XL. Oceanicola nanhaiensis sp. nov., isolated from sediments of the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:157-160 View ArticlePubMed
  8. Lin KY, Sheu SY, Chang PS, Cho JC and Chen WM. Oceanicola marinus sp. nov., a marine alphaproteobacterium isolated from seawater collected off Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:1625-1629 View ArticlePubMed
  9. Ruiz-Ponte C, Cilia V, Lambert C and Nicolas JL. Roseobacter gallaeciensis sp. nov., a new marine bacterium isolated from rearings and collectors of the scallop Pecten maximus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998; 48:537-542 View ArticlePubMed
  10. Thrash JC, Cho JC, Vergin KL and Giovannoni SJ. Genome sequences of Oceanicola granulosus HTCC2516T and Oceanicola batsensis HTCC2597T. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192:3549-3550 View ArticlePubMed
  11. Vandecandelaere I, Segaert E, Mollica A, Faimali M and Vandamme P. Phaeobacter caeruleus sp. nov., a blue-coloured, colony-forming bacterium isolated from a marine electroactive biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:1209-1214 View ArticlePubMed
  12. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Lee SY, Oh KH and Oh TK. Seohaeicola saemankumensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:2675-2679 View ArticlePubMed
  13. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Lee SY and Oh TK. Phaeobacter daeponensis sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat of the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57:856-861 View ArticlePubMed
  14. Yuan J, Lai Q, Wang B, Sun F, Liu X, Du Y, Li G, Gu L, Zheng T and Shao Z. Oceanicola pacificus sp. nov., isolated from a deep-sea pyrene-degrading consortium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009; 59:1158-1161 View ArticlePubMed
  15. Zhang DC, Li HR, Xin YH, Liu HC, Chi ZM, Zhou PJ and Yu Y. Phaeobacter arcticus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from the Arctic. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008; 58:1384-1387 View ArticlePubMed
  16. Zheng Q, Chen C, Wang YN and Jiao N. Oceanicola nitratireducens sp. nov., a marine alphaproteobacterium isolated from the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010; 60:1655-1659 View ArticlePubMed
  17. Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IM, Smirnova T, Nosrat B, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:D571-D579 View ArticlePubMed
  18. Riedel T, Teshima H, Petersen J, Fiebig A, Davenport K, Dalingault H, Erkkila T, Gu W, Munk C and Xu Y. Genome sequence of the Leisingera aquimarina type strain (DSM 24565T), a member of the Roseobacterclade rich in extrachromosomal elements. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 8:389-402 View ArticlePubMed
  19. Beyersmann PG, Chertkov O, Petersen J, Fiebig A, Chen A, Pati A, Ivanova N, Lapidus A, Goodwin LA and Chain P. Genome sequence of Phaeobacter caeruleus type strain (DSM 24564T), a surface-associated member of the marine Roseobacter clade. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 8:403-419 View ArticlePubMed
  20. Freese H, Dalingault H, Petersen J, Pradella S, Fiebig A, Davenport K, Teshima H, Chen A, Pati A and Ivanova N. Genome sequence of the plasmid and phage-gene rich marine Phaeobacter arcticus type strain (DSM 23566T). Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 8:450-464 View ArticlePubMed
  21. Dogs M, Voget S, Teshima H, Petersen J, Fiebig A, Davenport K, Dalingault H, Chen A, Pati A and Ivanova N. Genome sequence of Phaeobacter inhibens strain T5T, a secondary-metabolite producing member of the marine Roseobacter clade, and emendation of the species Phaeobacter inhibens. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 9:334-350 View ArticlePubMed
  22. Buddruhs N, Chertkov O, Fiebig A, Petersen J, Chen A, Pati A, Ivanova N, Lapidus A, Goodwin LA and Chain P. Complete genome sequence of the marine methyl-halide oxidizing Leisingera methylohalidivorans type strain (DSM 14336T), a member of the Roseobacter clade. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; 9:128-141 View ArticlePubMed
  23. Dogs M, Teshima H, Petersen J, Fiebig A, Chertkov O, Dalingault H, Chen A, Pati A, Goodwin LA and Chain P. Genome sequence of Phaeobacter daeponensis type strain (DSM 23529T), a facultatively anaerobic bacterium isolated from marine sediment, and emendation of Phaeobacter daeponensis. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013; (In press). View Article
  24. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ and Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26:541-547 View ArticlePubMed
  25. Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt P, Garrity GM, Gilbert J, Glöckner FO, Hirschman L and Karsch-Mzrachi I. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9:e1001088 View ArticlePubMed
  26. Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:4576-4579 View ArticlePubMed
  27. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: DJ Brenner, NR Krieg, JT Staley, GM Garrity (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part B (The Gammaproteobacteria), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
  28. . 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:1-6 View ArticlePubMed
  29. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class I. Alphaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
  30. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order III. Rhodobacterales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 161.
  31. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family I. Rhodobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 161.
  32. Martens T, Heidorn T, Pukall R, Simon M, Tindall BJ and Brinkhoff T. Reclassification of Roseobacter gallaeciensis Ruiz-Ponte et al. 1998 as Phaeobacter gallaeciensis gen. nov., comb. nov., description of Phaeobacter inhibens sp. nov., reclassification of Ruegeria algicola (Lafay et al. 1995) Uchino et al. 1999 as Marinovum algicola gen. nov., comb. nov., and emended descriptions of the genera Roseobacter, Ruegeria and Leisingera Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:1293-1304 View ArticlePubMed
  33. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS and Eppig JT. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:25-29 View ArticlePubMed
  34. Mavromatis K, Land ML, Brettin TS, Quest DJ, Copeland A, Clum A, Goodwin L, Woyke T, Lapidus A and Klenk HP. The fast changing landscape of sequencing technologies and their impact on microbial genome assemblies and annotation. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e48837 View ArticlePubMed
  35. List of growth media used at DSMZ: Web Site
  36. Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG and Wägele JW. The DNA Bank Network: the start from a German initiative. Biopreserv Biobank. 2011; 9:51-55 View ArticlePubMed
  37. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5:433-438 View ArticlePubMed
  38. . Web Site
  39. Zerbino D and Birney E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008; 18:821-829 View ArticlePubMed
  40. Butler J, MacCallum I, Kleber M, Shlyakhter IA, Belmonte MK, Lander ES, Nusbaum C and Jaffe DB. ALLPATHS: de novo assembly of whole-genome shotgun microreads. Genome Res. 2008; 18:810-820 View ArticlePubMed
  41. Ewing B and Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998; 8:186-194 View ArticlePubMed
  42. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC and Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998; 8:175-185 View ArticlePubMed
  43. Gordon D, Abajian C and Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998; 8:195-202 View ArticlePubMed
  44. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW and Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:119 View ArticlePubMed
  45. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM and Kyrpides NC. The DOE-JGI Standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009; 1:63-67 View ArticlePubMed
  46. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A and Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:455-457 View ArticlePubMed
  47. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K and Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25:2271-2278 View ArticlePubMed
  48. del Solar G, Giraldo R, Ruiz-Echevarria MJ, Espinosa M and Diaz-Orejes R. Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998; 62:434-464PubMed
  49. Petersen J. Phylogeny and compatibility: plasmid classification in the genomics era. Arch Microbiol. 2011; 193:313-321PubMed
  50. Chen Y, Patel NA, Crombie A, Scrivens JH and Murrell C. Bacterial flavin-containing monooxygenase is trimethylamine monooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:17791-17796 View ArticlePubMed
  51. Lang AS and Beatty JT. The gene transfer agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus and “constitutive transduction” in prokaryotes. Arch Microbiol. 2001; 175:241-249 View ArticlePubMed
  52. Thole S, Kalhoefer D, Voget S, Berger M, Engelhardt T, Liesegang H, Wollherr A, Kjelleberg S, Daniel R and Simon M. Phaeobacter gallaeciensis genomes from globally opposite locations reveal high similarity of adaption to surface life. ISME J. 2012; 6:2229-2244 View ArticlePubMed
  53. Buddruhs N, Pradella S, Göker M, Päuker O, Michael V, Pukall R, Spröer C, Schumann P, Petersen J and Brinkhoff T. Molecular and phenotypic analyses reveal the non-identity of the Phaeobacter gallaeciensis type strain deposits CIP 105210T and DSM 17395. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013; 63:4340-4349 View ArticlePubMed
  54. Cypionka H and Pfennig N. Growth yields of Desulfotomaculum orientes with hydrogen in chemostat culture. Arch Microbiol. 1986; 143:396-399 View Article
  55. Griess JE. Bemerkungen zu der Abhandlung der HH. Weselsky und Benedikt „Ueber einige Azoverbindungen”. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges.. 1879; 12:426 View Article
  56. Auch AF, Klenk HP and Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2:142-148 View ArticlePubMed
  57. Auch AF, Von Jan M, Klenk HP and Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2:117-134 View ArticlePubMed
  58. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP and Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14:60 View ArticlePubMed
  59. Petersen J. Phylogeny and compatibility: plasmid classification in the genomics era. Arch Microbiol. 2011; 193:313-321PubMed
  60. Petersen J, Brinkmann H, Berger M, Brinkhoff T, Päuker O and Pradella S. Origin and evolution of a novel DnaA-like plasmid replication type in Rhodobacterales. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28:1229-1240 View ArticlePubMed
  61. Petersen J, Brinkmann H and Pradella S. Diversity and evolution of repABC type plasmids in Rhodobacterales. Environ Microbiol. 2009; 11:2627-2638 View ArticlePubMed
  62. Zielenkiewicz U and Ceglowski P. Mechanisms of plasmid stable maintenance with special focus on plasmid addiction systems. Acta Biochim Pol. 2001; 48:1003-1023PubMed
  63. Cascales E and Christie PJ. The versatile bacterial type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003; 1:137-149 View ArticlePubMed
  64. Petersen J, Frank O, Göker M and Pradella S. Extrachromosomal, extraordinary and essential-the plasmids of the Roseobacter clade. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013; 97:2805-2815 View ArticlePubMed
  65. Giraud MF and Naismith JH. The rhamnose pathway. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000; 10:687-696 View ArticlePubMed
  66. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA and Horvath P. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007; 315:1709-1712 View ArticlePubMed